UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its( ] e7 Z0 h) K6 C$ |8 w5 e# Q
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider: U- \* G4 i. }- @4 {9 a6 K
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
( |& w& s) i$ {8 R9 g/ icity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
0 _4 Y! a8 P c5 q2 x$ _' YAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, [2 w3 e: J: \1 W1 ?
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
, ~& k9 l5 {7 oManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within2 V8 y6 u0 I$ L2 z. F$ R
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among) X q$ Y/ | a( p2 ]% z- k# L/ N
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
8 \: C7 y/ m& _( w4 `and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is4 u% t& N$ c* }* |
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
, L$ c1 |( T' g: U- ~" y; ydescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
6 h0 t% W: _$ d# N3 z8 A! sforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I& c8 G# [- ]/ h( r( C5 ^
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
& g8 a# O( t, | p* c+ {+ E( X, `- [impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,8 y/ p# J* D7 o: d6 T
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
+ q9 H# g. y7 y# ^! r( i, R. phas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment" G5 Z) ?# E8 J0 N5 @ m
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
% u" S& k) Z+ r8 Vno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are% J2 i* P1 K, ]
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a; a: o/ t8 R/ D' f8 f5 W
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
& y3 K$ s0 { U1 n! ~1 q% G# bwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move+ T# C9 F$ C* _9 H
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& \5 W! g: T+ i0 A, F
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
) e' q* v$ O; T+ o) K; b% e& }this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
# Y6 h+ }4 [0 y- `3 v: vstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
; L1 m0 h" P8 b; D"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make% K- z/ H, |4 K$ p
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was- h8 j( v1 c" r5 r; B
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a2 ^! @; T- c7 ]) G6 K' S! S
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
8 Z8 f7 E$ q# F% a( w3 m5 ?the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
! y2 X/ l' ?* ~% |8 zimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for( |% ]8 m* j0 e0 ]
development.
Hutongs! H/ |" T! S2 Z0 {1 T) v
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
. [, d* ^1 G0 h0 B! x; M& ithere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
' o! ?4 ?0 h4 Z7 P- h1 I7 |in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not6 r- m8 n2 `' Q; ^
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
0 K3 r) X1 R- N- h: Iwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.; [# P& W) T- C/ V5 e5 D U
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
/ D- y& `# d3 n9 P3 Q( [to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used4 ]8 S* s' J! [5 J
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
1 D. V, K2 `' |4 M2 G8 `support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
8 R: C; e) i" p" Wunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
4 L# c: _, Z. Q* Blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
8 C& x1 Y& b* T: P8 ?hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
, g9 k% k3 l+ E9 p7 M! mbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the$ E' w# ~: T; ]% Y; \4 Q0 Y
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be# F! ~ C7 w) [7 ]9 V1 H
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong' F+ u2 k4 b4 Z6 a" _" I
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
7 _ o( Q& v! U$ ipeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
1 }# |# m6 _6 r: Q5 U$ \1 S3 D+ rtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished3 n2 B8 V0 r t
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".4 d, b* Y- G% Y3 w, @4 v* C3 m
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
% g) S# G/ h' X2 C' H7 Daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
L/ ]: t4 ^7 ^" knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image' W, R" e" S. d# |! y+ y
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these- M7 M' M6 L5 _; K1 o6 K& h
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
5 n; ]% x% Y/ ]: Dpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they. F' w" v( D# [
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
2 S. g' y+ |4 xof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
7 \4 u' }; l0 X" }: I" v"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all& v* z8 G4 X- @% j
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
; O. [3 I8 K8 Y" o/ v% v: ^, \apartments are the way to go? No.8 [$ ~3 ] ?3 {; |/ t3 I
q8 K7 h1 M! O: V
, v1 g+ C) |2 K0 ~1 T; Z* y+ O
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
& T& ]- }/ g8 `4 Y% P9 B' _( ysituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this+ ]5 O- A$ c# J1 Q. Q1 B
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
/ f4 I$ c3 q z- w9 p9 T* E, A- @& X& Xno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so; I5 h5 d, Y# _7 v4 X
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
4 i, l& y, K* M+ l) G5 uresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless) m+ X+ a5 t9 D5 |* u4 Q& T
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is' y W- A) i8 y) e
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|