服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6531|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its( h0 r/ u6 w3 h! T; f. o+ u architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider) j3 u6 x/ H0 }8 ]' f7 t1 c Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"4 U: l( E! n9 N$ h# ^1 K city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. - L0 C/ _) l6 KAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,5 Z3 V9 r* n. |( V7 o: J, L& N 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of $ B0 d; [* ] GManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within. ^" e( F' X: W4 `+ X hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among : W+ l, |0 x) ?) R$ K8 Heach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera+ Y$ d" y" B8 o% F! f' z4 M0 C9 I and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ( `3 k9 R; g6 y& R, c U6 Nharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 1 f3 Y+ ~1 \5 Z' udescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ' \! l, x: F! k& x* o5 A8 L) P8 ?) Rforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 8 G' J* P$ k0 g F& m' R Hwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great c1 c, v$ u% x; ]impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,: g7 S. m# d: [* e and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong, U- D7 s s) S4 t has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment - D: x- b0 k4 W4 j3 Z9 C, c4 }of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that, @" F# V) {! a6 d; j no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are0 W- W% Z m/ u) D6 `4 U/ u only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 8 p, j% \: e! b8 Y% i% isort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government q! o8 i8 b5 }2 g* C3 N want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move & y1 Z$ ~, S' {8 g: Ato the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 5 C e% \ Z+ {+ r6 ^7 A* j% k"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,# S8 q# C6 ^# h& [0 K* h this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are- J' Q* x* D! O still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to1 P% [" o0 X, k- k6 s' Y "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make # \5 Y y; R4 E7 \money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was1 O7 w/ J) b% `9 I a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a1 j6 j! Z' b3 c! |% G' n1 ^. Y parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across$ ?/ z( A) W. Z+ E- C& Y the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural% T+ ~' h4 ~3 o1 Y& r importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for( R7 T2 ~2 D8 K, k( |8 b development.

Hutongs ! K. H/ A# |8 ]in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 3 B3 x2 ^8 Q" B4 V% V2 |! Qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 8 `3 K, w% ?- w9 Q3 ]in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ( f' ?) v* v3 P. f* N; K2 d" ~5 t8 Vhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you$ B. P8 S! n8 ?5 t/ x k will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ; E7 Z, Y$ S9 z: DFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 1 {# k$ l4 g' C) g: j" Eto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used / j& U2 h7 J$ Z: {( Y2 }to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ( V5 `! C! u% t8 |$ I2 k- k! u) X; qsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically+ J, ]- @1 b# k! b% Y+ o# d7 p$ A unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to5 ], `3 @; H1 M+ T live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, / \$ `, F( B# vhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the! e3 F6 w6 g* g4 V8 \) o+ D balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the . P4 s7 d: M. Z- |project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be1 d+ T! r+ c; K0 d7 C& o renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong : z H. w" h/ ]% {6 iMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how# [" U! P. H# B6 k% `$ ^( j* i people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be & _% R2 X% y- ~( q P: \torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished& `1 R; @! C4 @% r" k1 k3 R2 q# D. S7 T+ z memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".; I/ w$ I% k# X( A9 p% @2 j R Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are* I4 e* }+ r& D9 V% W. H) Q+ ` aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially* i& R" a1 n) S* T non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image $ d: t1 p: p$ l+ Z0 L4 Kof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these0 n$ r1 c( P) I" p$ L7 ^ Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 F* |/ t: L- { people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they . V$ ^. ?7 [& N7 o8 d) G8 s+ _5 M5 ]may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ! q4 c1 t" O: ^! O# uof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before o: g$ c, X1 q "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all0 l7 W5 f9 h( h' e people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 8 X. N9 [6 T3 `* ~4 C+ s" _7 Tapartments are the way to go? No.0 H- S& P2 F8 [1 d9 H & }/ {% p5 S9 ^) P. g+ u; @3 d5 I 8 i: c6 s" S: g# T4 H

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 5 K6 {+ l2 |6 M1 j2 b; J4 c. n1 A! msituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this( R: d& C0 X2 X0 b 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make; I( P0 Y0 t: l1 j! P& K" B/ Q/ P no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so & W! U& Y4 n* _! S& [( w7 @! ] a3 mfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant+ o# F, _ e4 v resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 2 C$ g0 ?7 P, }. \$ g4 y; g% UBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is # j- A3 N7 \7 q" xunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-21 13:58 , Processed in 0.130343 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部