UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
, @! n* H! X% O2 S! s; |! ~architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
( |* y! E( o5 ~. {9 `Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian") c6 f2 k/ C9 l* B8 J3 F7 Z
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture./ i* a: S0 R7 g5 O: _7 ]. M
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
) e% H) h- P: y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of$ t- J8 ~" c& J6 B/ K8 G
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within) w" v# d1 @, U, S
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
( q# k0 e) p" u0 l3 l/ O% j+ _each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
. @( i3 O, y& c' T* gand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is2 V9 O1 g' L+ @1 ~3 z8 s- c0 N
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are/ I! X- r' Z; l
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
2 X! r8 M7 w6 k+ p# {forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
9 F# p0 r8 V' j! i' }5 qwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great4 d3 ?. p6 q( }7 X7 K
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
$ W1 S e9 f6 {5 e# h: ~ I3 ?9 yand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong7 g; v# [ _! D; s3 b" Q! q; Q6 ?
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
$ [! _ ]* [/ s% tof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that5 C& X8 K9 j: c2 R* b- t
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
' l2 Y' o; P3 {) Wonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a: p. e! d" a+ f N5 P
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
+ \+ I5 `( I) u5 }9 z! cwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
. S+ A! ?+ _ C) k0 k" N2 Ito the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
; g v7 f5 O' b; V5 X; ^"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
" ^. Z o. f M$ z0 Ethis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
- V; \3 A" g/ P% {7 V4 sstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
" H5 `% A$ `8 C3 P"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
1 ] q; Z$ ?3 c$ f6 m+ Jmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
; F- J p7 S5 x6 @# E2 O. N6 qa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
; j, V/ d# `' |# a& Y; `parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
8 Y+ ^6 Z% t/ `. t) H' Uthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural$ g- ^0 ]. i7 [
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for# S0 q0 n/ n+ R5 ^+ b
development.
Hutongs
& x4 A! I/ Q4 d3 ?in the old days were residential area where people actually lived4 t# p% b9 ?, Y( g
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions& z3 @+ F9 d4 `# p. D4 D# n2 o! |
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
% s1 V4 X2 `9 C f6 \# q3 v) {have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
5 k! G# C; F9 Y" Y" M& `2 t* fwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.( `! v* R; T( | \- ~9 d5 p9 Z
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date1 {" `) U' i( [0 \
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
, [/ H: L; n9 v6 |3 rto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses& T1 e$ h1 _& G7 `5 _% ]
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically- A% @0 X; l* H
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to7 k$ @9 A% Q+ _/ H* V
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
/ p, Y' R$ D5 {hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
' m2 o) c2 w6 F' x5 o& j2 Sbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
+ R$ a' L& o3 O9 K7 {project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
& ^. d; t6 M& ?& Wrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong) `1 T: d- {- E
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
# f0 B+ s! [, [" Speople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be# P2 r- M# D0 V1 G6 A1 G' K! f0 w
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
, G1 S- _/ ~: w* m+ hmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
( D* H/ b, Q- d& E1 aNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
3 _% [3 F: N$ I! D {aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ~) e( l5 @ ]7 ]8 `. K
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
; [2 b: d* W0 t2 v$ Q4 {% ~& {of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these$ d6 l8 J" m0 b( r4 d5 D5 y- i
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those' R( Y9 @/ M! G" O
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
5 Z' j, M) p6 ^may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
0 l8 D1 n7 D9 U# p! Y, e+ gof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
& R" i3 S/ ]$ X- s; N! h"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
% ~0 f/ b5 }, X5 x1 cpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
! q) k2 \- `2 eapartments are the way to go? No.- V7 B9 Q* ?6 h B. W0 ~+ P
: E0 i6 x4 w+ A0 d. A2 j! j) a/ F) E4 ` * x6 |9 P9 d3 Y' c$ X. |, _7 \% L5 `, w
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
- j6 W: A3 T% n0 z+ psituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
* p) m6 v4 Y f$ N/ B6 l9 Q0 x) J: c+ i'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
7 i' f5 W3 C4 q$ Q m) i* gno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so4 @: m( t Q8 {1 R7 ^
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant2 b; ~6 \ X5 Y2 Y$ d
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
& ]- j& g: ]( N1 E4 r& T! WBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
4 p$ q. ~& e8 P3 q! Xunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|