服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6370|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; J& [$ ~) l3 H, s& w! {* Z, ^, T8 @ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider8 N% c3 ]2 c Q6 e' g6 X Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"% \" Z- B; L# s' m0 B city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. & u; y) `4 W6 w4 s( J/ S q tAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, : J# f: O5 m7 E3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of/ ^0 B5 x8 G8 O$ e" A Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within / A& }1 i- g: shutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among % P) Y; {. n8 x* o5 Deach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ) H' y2 |8 W3 Z0 v, I/ Gand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is - e, [& ~- v' D! g+ Iharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 8 M6 b; q0 |, f, y: R, @3 |! ^descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 G8 w2 w( ~3 E9 c; U, m; w forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ( \7 G5 y( M2 Fwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great* i, g8 N: O. ^- P3 t H impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,9 P. t; x' w5 N4 w and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong5 U+ w0 c4 r. c! @: E, | has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 9 _6 l) R9 I; _0 @7 S& G1 t5 fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ! N( |8 t& |0 r! k8 c' eno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are& T5 J4 V, s- ?! O6 U7 S) F0 a only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ( U+ D6 @' y) v# N# csort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government k3 t$ {, `* b3 v1 R% O/ Bwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# i7 M; J) K5 X! @+ e to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 3 N1 o& ~" @! a. K# I* `"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,% r. o7 Q3 ^( {/ n9 K& v/ o this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are; }6 O) s% B; |! v# J/ x& j still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ( J3 [7 A$ I! t1 P: T* S3 F1 [$ m"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make B" I. Z! R5 c! ~( ]( y/ Xmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was0 H7 t# z t5 f# x/ G a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ' d; N9 W: l, U8 o" y# Sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across " o" o5 d' r; v6 G( ^- ]4 y4 rthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural6 T5 a2 _/ Q# M5 K: f importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for $ Y! X. Y( @5 {development.

Hutongs$ L& H# P+ b* y* E1 q7 g* o& ~4 G in the old days were residential area where people actually lived+ t: b" b1 r3 q V* F, I' E; G there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions % V+ L' B. [; u) t1 b" ain hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not - d4 t' {" b! l3 Q i- C, b K& A! }have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you: |5 V' x) n& x- Z7 P will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ; x" ^+ K) L& ]Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date6 y) C+ Q% \ Q5 B+ L to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 0 Y, m7 Z, E7 p$ \" vto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses . J/ \9 s, l* y: Tsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ; }0 O* {( \2 p+ ounfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to + `7 J- o/ R7 N! r2 S4 b9 ?$ y8 ]live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, : `3 A V- V _' k4 bhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the $ R8 b/ b6 S- m# e3 u8 ^5 |+ Pbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the7 V8 F) e$ L* a2 |* H project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be5 r& m4 N8 T/ U renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong* a) v- m1 v' X K) S Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how- d( u" N1 b7 J# F ?8 \$ B ^( ? people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be% ^: s. d' [: Y+ L1 b torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished6 {; F" g9 ?# c \# @" z% a memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".3 w* u" p$ s8 V4 ` Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are8 E" m/ |3 E. ]( k( B4 s! J aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially+ u; v7 o& w) F2 M/ ^6 b non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image5 [8 H" b1 }, X# y' { of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ' Q: H" b3 v, e* g5 X: m4 V5 QHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those& V! ?, k) f- p" J+ w4 n people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 7 ]4 { p+ G! |. [ h$ k7 \7 Bmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some h6 ~7 H5 `* x1 c$ z' C0 ~of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before $ v4 a1 }: A$ _" e4 ~1 z! L0 |* O"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all; r( G$ o5 A: k people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise $ A, V! T) Z2 U8 m2 q' [apartments are the way to go? No. 0 M: ]6 o. k6 E; X9 k' d9 h * I) T5 A* c. a# d1 q; E- L 8 _1 V8 ^ a8 w/ N3 q$ a9 Y

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the; C% g. X% u4 m# m situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this' N1 C O* m+ F9 O' i( q! n 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make - f' s7 I4 U: Z; gno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so3 d0 G- e5 W' J; d fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant' e0 d2 u: v% @3 T7 C7 f4 j6 J resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless9 \1 M$ [$ z. [# u* s& D. h Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is % Q8 }2 \) y% `. Y0 H5 L1 w) [unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-5 10:46 , Processed in 0.149647 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部