服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6366|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ! z/ w# i; Q6 ~9 x4 i7 Yarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 8 D1 o6 C1 o# B7 k3 j* SBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" # a6 C: d9 t3 A; g% I0 U2 Mcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. : }3 h' ^& @* B) bAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, % ]5 p, a2 o3 k4 ?* Z7 S3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 1 B* m V0 N. d, W9 ?; Z( {; `Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within. T$ q' ~( P6 o" Y' C; ^8 _3 Z0 l hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among " S4 P# n: w, l$ teach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera : v" p* U; I ]and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ) ` U0 a* A. S4 tharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are/ o, R& }' a, `# s. r1 G descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and& Z: |4 E1 [7 Q2 c8 B7 f# U/ M forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I & k& h/ D7 o/ B# h4 L1 Uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great( w3 O. o4 ~5 o) H% g impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 9 N: R8 D. R$ v5 A7 h# tand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong , W# _5 ]1 f( O. G0 l" }) ohas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 1 U, U3 @. G$ @6 y" t7 Eof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that5 u% s4 l5 x1 ~! _7 v1 g no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are8 ~" f) H! @ U: L4 b8 l6 e only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a% R. i/ c' Q* L! ?/ P Z sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government- P+ U5 s8 d! A- g; n want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move r( }: [ O/ Z/ z0 P/ s( Rto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is7 ?- k: T. ^0 O7 G! [, N9 C* ^; ? "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, + O" U, P* j' e' B& W% }; fthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are$ g. e4 N% ]. E$ ? ^ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ! R% E! D( R" t" r/ f4 I"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make2 i8 [6 Q! U3 B& ^+ O+ l money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was7 U% Z. _: B' U8 R a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 2 M% R; u# K9 i4 uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across- ~$ E* k0 d* d1 c the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural' l% `4 N' T; [! J3 t importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 t9 k- f+ h3 M development.

Hutongs ' O& m8 ~. U0 @9 u/ Cin the old days were residential area where people actually lived b0 I: O& y9 \3 ~ there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions! H& ]' c5 `$ j! l1 p in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 1 o5 T2 |* [) X. B9 }; h9 W# }: Fhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ) k* s3 Y$ u3 H! d$ y6 k5 C, @will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.1 ^ Z. F' r& V8 Z& ~2 j Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date " h' o; M1 h4 @: l# Fto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 5 j/ `* T! H% J$ [( S9 Q6 Gto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses* S- f4 {- ?6 d+ E6 N: z support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 9 E d9 R8 t5 D. Lunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to" p, n/ u) r8 G live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, : K- \6 Q( j- R1 M# e% w1 c ]hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 1 | g1 q" ?9 F1 t3 ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the9 c1 A8 T2 X/ E1 U' W project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 1 w2 G$ x7 Q8 }6 O/ o+ ` g3 A7 p9 zrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong& S6 s4 g+ W9 H B Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 1 x& D: Y& N x z% i; W* \people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be + s& f/ @( c( `. v0 T' Ttorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished " J: E7 u5 Y0 d" F1 T' Smemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". # x* D* w+ U7 yNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are- u$ j" L' x" q. P" A aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially6 f1 y( Z3 }- s9 H- P non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 6 H: [2 Q" v4 [3 G. }6 w& ?of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these & r! U _1 G3 yHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those : X/ |+ q4 X5 C: g4 Kpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 8 B% }, |& s2 M6 `' omay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 7 N0 J2 ~7 l0 qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before# N( P+ X. c6 V5 E8 _: [ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all/ w4 ]; A8 m; H( J g. a7 d7 ^ people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise* j; c/ F7 U: f% w apartments are the way to go? No. ! v9 U( a1 i; S1 {5 {" e ! ?% t! [! E9 o/ K { K8 G* @ 4 \9 o# E! x" p2 {) t

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the + Y' `* O) ?) isituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this # P0 n& t* \/ P5 r. b+ j+ F% @'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make , [% I! G0 y/ u5 i/ L, nno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so3 q9 }" t$ I+ L k+ [4 M6 B8 V( D fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant4 k! H% y& O- W& A! u resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 4 y t/ a) {7 {Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is; Q5 a6 @% O" n4 v: R& O* R unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-3 17:28 , Processed in 0.150329 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部