UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
% C4 D" \ f# u1 e- barchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
: M$ z' A% u( r$ v J! P( cBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
1 f! H% Q+ Y. Y* wcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
\7 L4 G# I3 u/ H2 U$ jAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,) _ c8 ?4 Z. r$ ^, K
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
. P# t/ z* X# t3 b4 ]Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
$ @7 `) w7 w* e% g4 a1 ?* zhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among# _. x( _ H, I( g- P5 Y) _
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera* E. M# X, t, L- S- s& D
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
8 D! N/ v% P" q0 Fharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are$ e' D/ J U8 J* N
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
0 c- W4 m7 r* L# U' mforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
, J/ I r9 ]4 Z J; xwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
, w3 F- d6 c, I+ f" a8 _2 F# simpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,# G4 j' l( W6 q
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong5 R+ E) A, k0 ~7 U
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment' G3 V* H& Z ^) [7 M
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
, P) o, g5 V. T7 n5 ~no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
, q y ?2 O4 B, bonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
2 f& `6 d! F# Z& ^7 Q# N1 rsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
& S/ j- y6 j9 E7 F6 T7 u! Nwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move3 G1 r" k! U, a% T
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
5 ~, l, q! x& Q' Y"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
8 f2 T/ J7 o* F( m: D! Zthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
* y/ `0 _9 j5 d0 n3 ~' ~still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to( X( ~* ], r4 x9 q% l: |3 J
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& d+ m; u" h9 Y( M- c8 v) k) k
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
- j; X8 V$ v6 _ ^$ @5 Oa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
$ ~2 [% v: {9 P) bparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across r% [. V4 F% \5 U
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
/ l1 p' O! s4 h/ fimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for. u, b. R' J/ D: [& t- c+ p
development.
Hutongs
7 d1 m# t9 m. l' Xin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
* S5 i( i, L" k' T( R0 F( D2 Kthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions) S) r* a; n# g$ _! k- `, D
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not+ }0 s# F# _2 j7 E. L9 \
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you& G7 q/ h) N: A/ J1 w4 ]7 U- A
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
! d7 b, c1 {1 e# F! d$ L, \Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date5 h2 U- ?, q7 n/ `3 W% \
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
2 U/ [8 r" h; g7 v1 \to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
/ c( v. i4 F, @( ^' V$ Csupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
4 o2 T/ [* E$ C& M. z2 _6 Lunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
5 e' \# c- L- L0 X* t9 T- p' Z x1 jlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,( D. x" L/ R2 b0 Z' H D
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the0 X+ n% D6 ^' M1 z6 [9 P
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the' q C% ^3 Z" o8 w1 Q) C; @/ F7 H
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
' M, ]' _% ?* `& F" erenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong0 T$ Z. o# C3 D; _
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
" ^; m9 l8 y/ ?1 e# l0 j7 dpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be$ l! }+ ~# {" }7 d. N
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished3 E" i, [" y- N1 m6 m* C5 q$ W
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
5 t4 c* a; `/ b) i2 D" s( RNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
. `4 R* {/ q8 _* T; Q4 ialigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
1 g) c$ `$ d) x* k4 [; K. R& ~non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
+ t, @1 E8 s8 \6 n% T) @; ?# gof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
: E! J" ~1 y2 k+ I& x/ S& c9 tHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 D1 O( m4 u% T* O) J
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they7 b* L# w l6 M/ A. A2 q
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
- @8 m7 U1 ^5 z% ^# Dof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
4 U7 d1 `5 [) R! ^! s7 g"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
" r# v0 f' _' p! p% @people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
: B8 l4 t I7 B' F; b5 ^% c4 Xapartments are the way to go? No., ]! I6 ~6 f Q3 x/ a7 E3 D
; p: U9 w# D; t3 V8 D2 _! I I* m; u
. w; n$ r' Z& ~2 C7 n
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
% r, `! C% i# }/ o& usituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this+ M+ S3 K, P% l
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make" J$ S8 G/ Y2 b
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
: B+ h$ N& P: \" w' l* Zfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
9 c9 E7 I1 L% _0 I, N2 E8 z5 t4 Aresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
" @* A8 ~3 l5 A2 f6 xBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is% T0 e9 G1 L' c3 o
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|