服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6329|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its$ o9 @2 t( \' k( D4 t architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider0 L' g6 E: w8 v Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 9 u4 p# E2 B7 M. h* `city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.8 G4 e# U3 F& e2 J According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,% f$ |0 F8 |: f T0 u. z 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of+ T* c$ I: ~; [) n3 M9 F Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within I g2 \6 x6 ~5 P hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among: \: W/ n% S; S0 x2 j" k1 C each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera " I/ _) T+ s4 M6 j7 rand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is * J4 U1 q6 N9 [! `; {* o" g0 h8 _9 ^harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are * U a2 b5 J: O, J2 Kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and" m8 A# E% `6 h( }3 @+ A forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I; P9 P. X/ F6 t% J9 e was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 8 E+ g6 Z- J. @impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, $ }/ b0 @' a$ n: Y6 A6 `/ u: Zand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 7 L6 t4 I l% {7 E+ U; |5 Nhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment . e/ q" z9 _* U9 x2 lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that, X' C% ~6 ~# G4 X6 }3 a no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are * ~( v- W% c3 V( q+ v# |2 Ronly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a " m2 c* ]( F4 V B* T4 ksort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government) }: S! Y) t8 h- x( E" M/ Y& P: Q want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 5 m9 q3 j/ [- y9 R9 a: T1 o2 Gto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 1 x" t' G! _ F7 B0 n6 i"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, / t0 n5 M, h, u3 p; s. Xthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are8 W+ Q7 E/ N s8 V/ ? still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to0 ^" E$ U- w/ O, g3 Z "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make + M1 A# {$ L7 W7 O- _3 F# ~money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was Z( }5 o) j3 J" x4 J8 K4 N a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a & r% `1 ]. Z+ R# g) lparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 4 V( x/ a; M0 X+ k2 o. cthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural( W" ^4 ], Z1 G u3 h importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for % C% D2 T6 F, s F2 xdevelopment.

Hutongs8 t0 B" G9 u: p# J: p, a3 e' M" N in the old days were residential area where people actually lived6 I# D/ `) g7 ?! t" c0 j5 y there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 3 j7 [( N/ ?. gin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not - Q# e O0 H" Whave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you4 _8 V; a5 l0 L will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 3 p- ~. A! F8 VFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 1 i B. _- y6 p7 O- r* G" e+ w+ Oto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 8 ]/ D6 A8 P+ e2 g/ oto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses - X$ V, c$ e" B" Psupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically - }' s+ c8 v$ D& Zunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to R: H+ p) D, E5 A( p, r live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 3 T( H; Y# k% }- Y! o8 l" E% {hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the4 U" p- }' z1 z5 g! p# v balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 1 v) y& D/ a. y0 Q$ h, qproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be & {3 S; _2 [7 D) j2 y4 Qrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 5 H( W7 o" N+ w& ]* U- e }Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how * I9 K( g! R! B# Mpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be + w" A* z; X* L* x- z1 |; W4 |torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 1 X& y" a: p& W( Z2 g6 @memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".9 K0 K4 K8 P9 t [7 l0 U7 ? Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are4 W0 S1 _# |1 z# O aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially! L0 X& B( X* L+ J. j- h' D. z7 \ non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image , ~* j8 G; H0 P5 eof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 1 m6 L- V6 x1 I0 N. ]Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those6 y( d- J) Y T/ a5 A0 u1 [ people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they! c8 W9 G. M# _2 g, { h2 i+ c may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some . \2 W! l, R3 T2 n6 Eof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before7 }$ f# |. K/ A( u$ h/ M5 q w3 i "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all2 e" b# |! j; e6 q5 F' L, T9 o' h people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 2 F, Y& F) E, m1 {8 @apartments are the way to go? No. ; o; E# b. M' l: {7 W9 P ~* \3 |- n1 y, {1 A 8 ]7 W' j/ A7 G* G5 p+ G

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 9 |. ?7 W3 b7 m% v7 C& t. ~situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this / k8 z; w8 J" q6 y' m'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make+ q, ^5 O5 G8 N8 F no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so0 i# j7 k! F/ O7 D. @ fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant % n- u3 R$ [; ^resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless' {1 _+ E1 D5 F Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is: t7 O- D1 e6 A3 C6 ~0 i% Y unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-28 05:05 , Processed in 0.131659 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部