服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6297|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its5 i$ d. a+ y0 I0 ]' b$ g0 b architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider , s; Z/ Z: V8 g( x* XBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"2 |# E1 w$ w' c. a- S, K city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 0 `- ^' e8 l% y5 ?$ z. p$ wAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,5 G9 J k% S' r; E9 v8 ? 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of' U, o$ h0 ?& f Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within. w! j7 J& [* {5 d hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among , e: n C3 k. Peach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera , O3 }1 e& {( v1 | r/ H8 Uand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is9 N& |3 _- l1 f6 }8 g( T6 H& \ harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 T' X: f& q: U" P: c descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and/ m; X4 z. W x8 o# `* F! z forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I* I: R- {. `1 | was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ( j* `: N# `7 |- d) \- Vimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ) F1 X& T# E D+ T1 }and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong $ V& E! {$ E8 Q ~9 Rhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment# q9 ]$ P/ Z9 Q of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 8 M9 l, u" D3 L7 q0 { T5 Z9 mno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are : L5 h- n8 A/ monly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a' U( W; Z" f4 f3 `! N sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government / S# h7 j8 C4 w5 z! E$ Ewant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move7 X6 }$ V2 @' `3 {. R# o to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& a8 s5 B2 Y/ N. N4 Z- v "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ' f7 q6 o, e) K" |8 C/ `- b, qthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 3 F" [$ B: g9 o+ u. X! F7 i8 t- Astill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to + o# ]: A$ O9 }: ["progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make; t! a% M/ s% ? money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 0 _: \6 j( z$ X5 |1 p- Za beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 9 h W2 G& H! L+ ^# Rparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across , j6 v, m6 U! y$ dthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural & Z: [4 W9 P' O9 B- l0 nimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for) I8 `& K: `( }0 Y) Y development.

Hutongs : v/ ~: d7 ~! L( M# Pin the old days were residential area where people actually lived . F9 H' ^: ]' U$ z9 b' pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions) v7 C: j2 l% U in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 0 i' t1 {, m- |% U- J* c) v2 l7 _, {: @have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you " F' v3 L+ Z9 U* |; E$ \' x" xwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.3 E, B" k1 D% o/ R$ j: F) d' U; J' i Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date, ?1 H% x" {5 y to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 7 {! n0 o+ f! J! t& N% eto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses- Z$ U3 `2 o2 p7 @7 F% `2 N support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically: k, A$ q# R, o8 J9 Q unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to - g" C, j+ d3 E N) {, tlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, E5 t" [. V" z& U- t) a- Ihutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the* G" O" \: T! w* ^& Q$ f) p balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the0 P3 u$ g$ _7 b" ?! v1 m project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be! p" Y$ n/ W* f renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ) s" P; d( u: O8 I/ C% }Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ' k$ v0 ^5 L) I$ Speople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be. Z" q6 B# x, Y, o torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished0 [/ \: H+ A7 X/ T1 y memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 7 n! ?& }# A, k4 zNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ) q$ m$ `3 f) qaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially+ F8 O8 X" D* `$ I9 S0 h( @ non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image. M! l7 V: d4 f: X of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these $ s/ D, M$ Q2 A1 C0 T; z9 m$ {/ ]Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ! H) K& \! o; q$ ^people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they % \, n+ N6 ^1 N# M+ g t) |may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some Z% w# E1 d2 G1 h) ~of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before3 P! {# N- |1 c. b+ {2 r6 ? "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all1 X. }5 x) _8 g* } people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ! B" w. e+ k6 L! _( H# uapartments are the way to go? No. " ^/ C z6 s) N- S2 ~ 3 Z% [) v3 A* h . B8 x5 G; D; R- T/ j( I9 f

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the% D+ H7 m/ b/ j* x/ v/ a" V situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this$ `% L# G! b* K$ t% F6 q0 K- i7 f 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make0 J0 Z: ?4 V* Z. `* v no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so0 s+ q2 K. ^: T1 r9 ]4 ~ fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant $ q7 i2 Y' T- U6 Mresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless! [, L8 r1 \2 ~ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 3 [. h3 C4 K/ d! T9 Gunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-16 20:10 , Processed in 0.201331 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部