服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6562|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; [7 L7 y4 c. o8 n& n2 B architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider. T) @" q, z" h8 C. t9 r( @5 | Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"; R* s6 P6 }% t( N7 L& n+ P: | city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.: |$ m' i) Z/ w: T6 { According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,1 O T7 Q P3 V' G- \1 \ 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of / C1 C& E& ^3 { x! y" NManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within , I* u$ Q j+ N1 Yhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among: d5 e% ^$ Q0 S P2 ]8 w9 }8 H each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera. R3 ^! f' I4 Z F; g and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is . W4 D3 k) u \/ ^% [0 ^: charmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' q$ f- V3 ~' @4 k) ^ descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and L# a& b) q, d$ V6 r0 O9 E, i5 iforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I" Q- Z6 Q2 G$ i was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great+ c( Y! E" u; Q& Q, B impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, : U9 B, h# w B6 c. D1 J4 [and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong$ l0 W, }" k' e has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment; i& K0 y. J8 f4 A1 h of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ; y4 f8 m- Q+ h, R& h6 ^2 `1 ?no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are $ l& ^* K( x7 p: w+ ^. ~3 Ronly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a3 q9 p; L8 `+ {0 {8 u; T x sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government- w$ \4 P1 w) ^ }" \% @3 |: L want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move / x/ s8 s$ A3 Nto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is / `+ v9 e5 a1 _* j! [- y0 o"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 U1 ^5 u# T; w; q this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are% D5 ^' C# B0 _, ?+ C2 t still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to w e/ G1 v+ s5 k. q' j- ~( ?' l"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 3 R" Q0 R7 t4 k% r" o% n+ Y4 m: [money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was$ J1 a# v7 M, J4 A2 |( M5 y* _ a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a3 I* q; {- L' q/ J [. H parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across5 \8 b+ w+ o6 H" m( b' P* j! j6 t the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural2 K" G0 D8 M8 Q0 D importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 1 {5 h& b- C1 X7 b# b" h. L+ J. ndevelopment.

Hutongs# o4 K) v, z2 j$ C- p! H" q in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 0 K- m3 w" `9 D) t, x, ~: l& rthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions! N7 U. j9 x3 I* }7 Y3 b in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not3 R( \" z8 R7 T# y4 B% r: s/ k& `7 h have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you & _! K) I) Y: u) dwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.7 A' O; ~/ x) y Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date% j3 G& }, v2 U4 P8 e9 G; p3 C to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used; W5 @; w# p \3 a0 z+ k! Z to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses6 t' r$ v8 x: ?$ Q+ r0 D support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically |2 z" {1 o p' b' O; ` unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to+ ]* P+ J. L# L7 M live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, & C" U+ k/ r: P* z# H7 |+ }9 s. thutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the$ z3 S) E8 G0 ]( [8 @! C balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 5 |5 L- x- v- ?" Pproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 4 S. o& Q8 o7 M' Lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong( O F: k4 X/ k' Q" ^1 \ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how / b( o( J- d3 a. H5 w6 \7 Gpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ! r4 ~5 B0 B5 @' x% b3 P7 h5 p1 |/ [torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished " u( J2 h3 d% R4 d3 x1 }8 R/ b; d( Rmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".) q3 u E5 M" T- g Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are) c* B L& h2 C* n/ d% X aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially% `1 ?, u/ w( ]- U4 H. T- F6 X non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image A& s3 M2 _, C! D of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these, B. c$ Z8 @9 _' e Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those , Y5 A% P; y* K1 |: A+ @1 Ypeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they2 D* }5 x+ Q' M) [6 K4 l7 Z may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some( a# ~# S' Q7 g- s& e" f of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before; |- w2 \7 V! V# L "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all, {9 R. b- |5 v6 t% Z6 } people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ( \9 N0 {1 m, }4 ?9 yapartments are the way to go? No.+ [2 Z8 W! l& h( b0 P 8 d" c; h* M5 E) H8 L* X ! i8 Z$ G$ m; c/ L2 m4 I: E9 i

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the: t/ F6 H0 Q: h# ` situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this & ^+ s, s$ c" J) U, W$ e'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 6 I9 }! I; Z$ P# R6 M9 C/ qno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so1 Z' e$ S# r4 i" K: [& U4 p1 O fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant1 f, ?+ K/ U8 l. L5 s Z7 u# Y resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless % w& D$ }6 ]/ G% A5 {# v" @Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is F- b+ Y! k& f3 U8 I4 yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-26 04:11 , Processed in 0.117145 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部