服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6732|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 1 v% z' \! f8 d0 |2 `" ^$ yarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 7 Y" q4 q: {6 w, |' pBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian": Z2 ~; o8 B. x* h1 {. E" [ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. " r/ E/ `3 t# O: @6 A$ t) F8 I. k7 ZAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,% m- a& x7 p) W$ Y- a 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of$ S, ]% R c' X$ n Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within+ m2 P- s" f J2 S e4 Z hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among , T7 h. X, |1 s1 aeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera & z2 h; q& M. oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is: M* T4 X0 t+ n7 l; C harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are$ t; l9 V* c- E! U' w: P: @8 u descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 7 e" ]; H4 P, }& G- iforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I / } U5 J9 |1 }6 F/ u9 Awas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great! r5 N7 N' d9 X' g2 x impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, # s8 q! f) a5 o* T$ U* Wand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 7 I3 t% W {. _2 Q; T' Bhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ( O, B/ K( ]1 Fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 4 K9 H4 y( s( H( ]no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ! c( `, N* }6 l; e) b7 c+ ]# s/ l- gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ! Q6 |& ~, g* X# }sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 2 ?1 p, H: X2 a. M1 Q" Q, L- Z; z, w7 Mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- y. p0 a; C! @ to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 9 d+ r7 d0 v: o6 {"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, , E4 S7 E1 Q( |) Zthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are9 T7 h5 k/ i" c5 ?- E. J' k still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to8 l- x' |4 \$ A9 b "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make) f: K5 y5 N9 E5 T2 a money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was0 [$ T @# I& D- m% G a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a" w; V2 l- b# l parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across : X& a5 l \9 |" n, k9 gthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural o9 q. q8 x* }- Q2 e( G( P importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 y' P4 Y( L7 F; x development.

Hutongs 6 A( ]- X) G& F% @- s& |in the old days were residential area where people actually lived6 x7 n$ z( ?; s: u O( S there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 2 ^. o" H8 }! q, Y: R7 T9 din hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not . \4 \5 R! O2 f3 Jhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ~. O% v- u" L1 x/ r- }7 Y" m will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.# N) R: c7 r2 R' X! q3 l! h Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 J- c* z( c* F0 W) [ H to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ' G& L$ _5 t2 o* c0 @to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses $ w& h! s1 H1 @8 T: E) ^4 lsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically6 W: L; e- V" H* \7 N7 X- N unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to1 Q) q0 c" D9 h% s; e; ^( n live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, . W& y1 |' L. ~9 o5 }& r* Ihutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the/ f/ W$ j+ p+ o+ u+ R balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the# x! L; c2 f W$ R1 C project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be3 p" m* @ ^* L: @ renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong g" \3 D5 ~7 p; l) V Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how; k( ]/ A: T8 B, X* u' p3 E people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be2 ~2 u; B6 y6 e$ Q torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished" U! r: _6 F& a' l memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".) H& g; q" g* Z7 ^# E Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are l8 K, Y, B1 H; z, @aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially % w! e% X: a% Q7 x1 \: Q5 Znon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 5 E& t+ y; F* O2 J$ kof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ( o: B4 k$ W& @% t8 K& CHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those) q; P1 o' e% O5 { people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they8 B2 S, _ [5 U may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some; B; B0 y- V- l3 E5 e) @1 O* d of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before* v- b" L. ~2 m( c, A) p: ~5 `2 u "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ( ~, |* x: N7 \, s! Vpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise: a3 H8 q$ G& s) x apartments are the way to go? No.9 T3 D0 p s% x3 v E2 ^' E ! X9 t: _% X3 F) v- [' ?& ? ! R5 x3 v1 Q% b

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the! Q8 I2 ^" p- u6 V; K situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ) b R: Y- {8 U2 T. y3 S9 q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make4 u4 K: f! \) q }; D8 H1 d, h" s0 k no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so4 _7 d4 A! m- s+ t6 B* Z: Q' m& x6 P fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant : |! c' F! l* w1 \resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 u% x7 E. t( S1 N) |% s Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 5 w5 P x% w) g6 X% x' ]1 Munlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-14 11:54 , Processed in 0.115981 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部