UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its/ i- L! J- R' B2 A( f3 L
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
0 u9 @& ?4 w- n4 tBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian": A; S) i; }7 H- Y$ @6 R
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.) p. j) p" i9 s" b# d& S
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
; e/ U! ~6 k7 _9 Z8 e9 t; }3 V3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of* B6 _: q2 C3 o0 b: N A5 Q
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
1 T7 | }% v) Q0 l5 d) m* a1 uhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
5 B( N& v: j& r/ J, Zeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera' o2 R* s! e5 W. R& D* ?: W
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
. u9 ~. P; L$ e) o5 {5 X) Nharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
X7 S0 I7 ~& Q# N& D3 S+ gdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and. N) c. T, I. x7 K# Q U
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
( y# G9 ^4 b1 K1 N0 Qwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great/ _4 z9 j9 Q" }. Y
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
6 `! ~4 z9 m0 E3 y, J7 w4 E( `and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
: M# x1 Z9 o( v6 O( e- u9 Lhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment, y S) z$ j. ?. X3 `
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that9 `2 D) K6 Q+ d! s
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are' X1 B; I: R4 X# X4 n6 Q4 ^
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
T* F% ~8 e) q) Fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
: E) I4 \2 B# q j; x" Lwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
7 U; F* s! {$ z% M1 L* o( ato the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
6 i5 h, v; T/ z* J d"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 o j2 H' ` F9 z1 P* r: C$ l
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
! g& @3 o; ~# R( `- j8 ystill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
$ h7 }* C1 }/ w" m6 d6 v"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make6 x: s& G8 _7 y( U1 \) E
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, h. F" \ `7 {8 o/ \3 g5 B7 W
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: U; y# j' n; k1 K' W
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across, \ h$ {* w4 b# d) S
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
( _& j/ s* @$ D: o- Y+ |3 qimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
2 T/ u2 l7 |5 Wdevelopment.
Hutongs
8 U/ O3 [; I' ~" @) A! Lin the old days were residential area where people actually lived7 K% u6 K4 @" R% ?8 ^" p+ _; n
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
* Y! F7 t4 x* n* B( Fin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
. U/ i2 D4 F8 G! V4 A7 Q5 Whave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
0 G7 |! T/ X/ E5 h! ywill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.; K# E$ q N% a
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 F: o7 i+ X# o3 ?
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
5 v0 ]* l4 n. G4 z7 y1 c! qto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ]* y! a$ I+ X! b+ n) M/ A
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
9 E) I, H6 e: S8 G p( \; Vunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to M6 u( S3 U7 ^6 Y0 q
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,9 H9 M3 z- Z/ Z0 K4 A3 y1 g/ i! |; w
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the) O* q( I0 J2 p+ \# t0 T
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
' r0 o- E7 \! h* \( J- kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
! Q/ @0 F Q( W& [% }renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
* w! M% M4 d7 ?( N8 fMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how$ b, b$ A7 I5 K" E% E
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be- P5 q8 E8 C& ~2 W; C
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
# v# A( O7 i8 ^( d+ S% q2 X3 }memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".! B. X# C& B, d/ C3 b( r" R3 n2 [4 @1 _
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are! J( l" V+ S" c; k' J" Z. ?
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
* h) T% Y" X& ^# ?# I- G. ?, [non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image" w* U6 p! X& \4 O
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these9 F' C+ {" X/ f5 a
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those% y' ] @) H* }) I; H: ^' Z4 M
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
0 m* V/ i9 ^0 s5 p: j) Mmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some+ }1 g* H: V$ d; B$ q8 t# y9 X& u
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
& _3 \9 q3 q. t+ F1 i6 A: A% p"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all8 U5 H5 @5 m2 F* k4 r
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
: B( F: t7 ^3 D, \9 J1 k/ e! Tapartments are the way to go? No.
! f2 U7 v8 O5 N4 ]* O . a; R" l C3 q! K) I1 g$ L2 @/ h
+ v1 t7 I5 a8 B* w# \
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the4 B( p5 R1 T7 O
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this$ K2 J1 @. {) L3 _/ Z6 l
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
% G# U+ q" \/ D/ Kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so' r' M' d% x& Q5 D7 k0 I
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
- C/ f8 s5 d( L8 k/ N6 Z5 Xresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
- j) G# t5 S j. YBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is. X5 x7 K6 W6 `8 g4 b: ~( f
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|