服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6646|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 8 y( c: V" J1 Y% a i; n9 e4 K# Oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider- }8 l: R: T+ @2 i Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"( m4 O6 m: z) b( B2 G" y2 Z city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 8 d7 r# w' o! OAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,2 G6 q4 b& w, q+ S* ^ 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of! }: \7 |+ d/ B8 n% W+ `$ D* h Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within" W0 q3 {, `/ u/ [; y% P9 }" X hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among2 `4 z% p$ a8 l1 n# L$ F8 l each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera4 _6 y% J" {: `8 X4 z! \ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is& n: N* _9 g% j; J harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are( X3 @# M: `' t; S descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 R8 O% [( R# P2 G9 k+ `" v9 s/ Z1 Q forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 0 g: p4 E- I" s6 x' P- R U+ D$ Twas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great! W( \ ~) u) x3 W impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, & [0 R+ n8 y% c0 m5 i5 b* \, Nand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong( M. M! W4 @ T* C: e has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment " \* C h6 u- B7 n4 V' t4 qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that" O9 {& d8 B& M/ V, N! M7 H no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are % s; H& s& }/ o8 s, x6 V( s) Lonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ( x. ~# ?1 I% D9 Jsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government5 u* ~3 q& U5 s- r) i want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 5 r" T( q9 a7 j/ N! x- mto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is % ~/ \+ `! n1 ]3 T/ ?"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, I- Z+ F! C1 j$ L9 cthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are9 D, [% l6 g( Q' a% E still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to' n0 x2 O, I' r "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 3 Y) K# W. c" b# ?money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was7 J w* c7 U0 k a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a; Y9 C- \/ F8 v' T parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& B. M2 m# m2 X the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 0 |/ o% E) J: c9 F6 Kimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for ( E) n' X- t7 C8 w8 ~! n( H/ L+ cdevelopment.

Hutongs 8 b( \+ m1 V& @8 J, G: tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived" U) S: B% B) S- P) k there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions4 j; s0 a/ Y( L# t in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 7 o5 n/ N! j! [$ c8 l* E; x' {- ihave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you " Q" N" F" L5 C2 r; nwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. * I' T& C: j5 F# o7 T2 Y+ IFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 6 {+ C& d% w# Q0 H6 x+ Lto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used & X3 B$ h4 z k# cto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses' P/ G2 s; D5 \5 D, b& k0 J$ d% n& P2 [ support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically * K0 d- m( C4 Tunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to& t& ~0 h S) B2 E live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,/ O, f5 N4 X* p, f! v hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 1 x6 b+ t( r# T: H7 H8 fbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the$ r6 M, f, U" }2 e! Y' t- O project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be7 q8 n9 R+ }# G O renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong E7 n; W0 l# N( ^8 p8 PMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 5 k- W) [ `) Z1 S# f) C4 `' ~: Zpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be+ U, h0 @0 d6 ]* _. N5 L- l torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished( p6 o0 U8 ]& Y8 Y- I' z1 L memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".2 N7 n5 e. V" o3 r! p# I" j$ q F Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are0 h$ r$ y ?6 j+ V% q' U' d1 i aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially9 h I( T2 ?' k& F9 W non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- a% _! u4 b5 }* n3 L1 S" ` of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these $ U* j" M- j$ ^$ O9 o: |3 W( SHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those1 C; A9 B" K% a$ `. F people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 2 @1 K2 v. m- v4 ?7 e7 p2 gmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some , V& l$ B' P' O0 f' iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before: @/ _: t- r1 d Q* Q0 X: i "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all% r. c9 e+ Q& b, m, ` people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 5 z( z- O7 A! S- Z# K3 G2 Napartments are the way to go? No.' R% x9 a8 W( J% e1 A& {& s " S! s7 ~0 @- i0 J: g 5 W3 R9 j- r; F3 M; `9 ?

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ; r! U& c. R0 y/ w5 Ysituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this- ?2 Y2 W$ S ]0 j4 d( k; p 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make7 { v9 R! I% X no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 6 U; [) k9 ], o! ^4 g& ^9 qfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ; P1 {7 }. R, Kresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless$ ]" a+ K) l$ ^! i: m1 J! V, j Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ) @7 T! L0 @. Vunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-4 19:39 , Processed in 0.125408 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部