UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its* m# V& n% |$ |( W) ~/ m6 D
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
$ k% d2 x( C: t0 L/ w- p PBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"0 U# D4 O4 _( ]+ t4 X
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.+ _& R. n" U* W6 P1 e$ `8 A- K
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,. [$ }! e- @0 _9 u
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
J5 a6 v }. Y) N8 }Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within7 `' y, W& _# ]- `6 {- G: f* \3 I2 M
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among, B2 Q: F5 ^9 W9 I- b1 v
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
1 k; t* c, |$ J% V Jand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
/ V \5 d) u. t& P& charmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are) T6 s4 w; N+ Q/ [ t
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and5 x/ g7 T1 o( J' _
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
) N# }, a4 b! i4 u: c k; mwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great# Z( q/ k3 X' D% \+ b
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
3 \ N2 `2 p+ J0 Wand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong1 C4 X/ v" E: Y1 l
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
9 D: H, T' p3 u6 f% vof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
# `5 r; c/ |* _- Lno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are4 a( ~7 d7 X# i
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
2 v7 j. d% b" T& J& L+ ysort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
e6 z6 K' e% f ]( ]4 Nwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move/ ^) h; t6 V5 F4 n8 b( h$ l& c
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
" V! u: M8 L$ G5 Y' w"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
' O7 G7 m; p; Q/ xthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are( m! l8 }) J, r% H1 R- f9 s
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; g$ ^; g# d- G1 F
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make/ q! [ u: I: ]7 P! I% t
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
4 K: m6 g& e$ X% Aa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
. D* U% ?4 T. O! v3 ?& Hparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
. [7 w. v N6 |7 @7 M* Q2 Z& Mthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
4 o1 Z$ p/ v {importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
5 G3 _! I/ u7 Idevelopment.
Hutongs
! q! x, Z% l8 H8 l* K# Q. B- c, T0 K$ Vin the old days were residential area where people actually lived. t$ \4 f; ]7 \) ~. y. n
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions( j. {$ T# I+ f( N
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not" l2 Z0 Z% V. j+ H
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
9 s2 ^# ?4 C9 C6 M+ A% ?5 @2 dwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
1 q7 ]6 ^6 v- AFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
) l6 ~/ H- S0 O7 g! Vto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used: R' n+ v3 X6 ~
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
3 I) v6 \) E# M! D$ Dsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically5 d* p* F4 Z6 z V, _. o
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
9 n% f6 p$ k plive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,* b% R) x# {+ ~( y
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the2 `2 J+ C: s2 f- @2 J) {! {
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the2 C. K- ?3 ? M( {# x
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be/ Z' b& c- O" M5 _& S% p3 b7 J
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
8 Q. `7 r/ u/ RMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how( _; ?6 Z5 x. O
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be" O9 k! C; w& p9 a' c
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
4 u ^, A$ h3 E" Smemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
) S! h/ v0 @/ m* A; z5 lNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
% D7 U& H7 o" w) e6 ^aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
- g: e& F; L$ E: {non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
9 D# g# U- p; b% j Y, ~of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these" `8 d! f) u# ]7 n, W
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those+ K9 o- T8 x" C1 i. m' q. v
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
0 q& g5 e% }3 j E( M5 r% nmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
& ]: l# y) q# X0 ~+ nof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
4 ?1 X! o. E! ], F0 g, b. h l/ t"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
, ]+ j$ A& e- y0 W0 d6 Zpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise+ }" A* \0 S8 b( L: k/ M
apartments are the way to go? No.3 R% s, G2 V2 ] M0 `, K
% A0 P/ g* ` n2 _8 T
* D* \8 R& P# B
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
8 i! ~! V% p7 X4 ^( Lsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
6 u1 Z; a. G% [% G( W7 m" h Q" U'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make. N* B/ X0 C7 |( e3 D
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
) |9 B9 q# r! {3 S1 Ifast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant" Y- ^" u/ \( Z* T" k
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
[0 ?* M- J. Y4 L; l% [+ qBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
\% g' w$ c( X) r, k9 J6 Z/ Kunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|