UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its2 E1 y/ X u' T$ Q: H2 A
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider/ Y7 `7 H7 f7 T* t" P, t
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
. W& J3 C! B5 A) F4 Kcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.& x- o& a5 ]9 _7 h' D4 Y5 I
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,5 P# f$ l, S- d7 j5 ?
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
2 ?( A! x; i0 p) k" h# u' cManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within5 G S3 O! C4 m
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among4 e( P0 @( C. l. E
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
4 w" W: s b1 y* R6 Vand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is$ ^$ b2 P1 d' G: X% O( T
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are+ U/ `. ?0 X+ t7 `0 I& o
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and7 O8 P3 ?+ {8 ?/ E% U% P" o% I$ _
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
0 ~7 O8 v) `! r1 v# bwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
' m7 c, q" _- iimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,/ M9 L$ _8 h7 _7 G# {
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong* L3 g8 D+ a4 U! k
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment2 y# E' m0 y+ F6 u
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
9 u5 T0 Q, _! i5 ~0 k4 O3 A; n' Vno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
5 G* s2 b; f) x: v% f# gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a" _# H( b$ t7 h, I3 N
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government# k( x _2 f6 N+ }8 Z6 U% W
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
1 Y& y4 L/ t+ ^( fto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is9 }( O4 R$ }% ~ u) I8 A& R# _
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
3 X: C2 L7 j: h/ `, ethis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
7 E2 v& R8 J& f% Y$ ]still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to- Q% D! Y3 ~# T+ S0 m
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make) V+ U# S/ N$ ]7 b- z# M* v
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was7 [; D0 @) t- a O
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
1 X/ I6 K. `1 Z/ D) A: v* i2 W) \: gparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
2 _- h6 N1 l+ f3 w: rthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural- u: `0 [3 G) I& n2 J! f: A3 a
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
& A% x5 F7 @3 [# F6 c: ^; ^# bdevelopment.
Hutongs J* K; q, o) S3 ~
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
1 x! E! \4 [: v8 p& E) Pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
( W0 z' A1 t0 z1 D! H( k" U8 min hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not7 P8 y; k1 O# c; W
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
; L7 g. g8 T* @, a) |. ^6 {- \will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs., ~% L) R( ` J6 S/ ]
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
+ q4 `! e" X' w9 b' A5 @) Jto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
( { c Y B! D8 \) Mto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
8 Y; B2 \7 @! o! ]' c0 B- isupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
; C/ g3 y/ _+ H* ^: D1 e/ Punfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
- w/ E6 o7 z& b9 o' U9 Zlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
5 Z4 r9 O; V; P" Whutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
4 b0 w4 f6 a6 x, M7 s9 h4 ^balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the7 Y5 D0 H4 j. d0 u
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be0 i, T* l0 u$ c
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
c. v. T. q& C A: hMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
, K Q% G5 d8 l( s, Z& M9 Y" Kpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
. a+ Q8 W/ r) A% vtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
2 J8 ~; S f$ Z5 G# M% q0 Pmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"./ K4 i7 I+ A4 Z
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are1 ?& N0 h+ g; b1 R& h
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
3 x% R' h, G' b" _! z/ Gnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image0 a7 y* ]; i+ q1 L$ y! m
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these! t2 s6 Z" T# d
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those: C. l8 d0 ]( J4 [ ^9 F
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they& j4 U ]+ f7 H" n1 N% Q
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some, ]: p7 @3 ]& r* Z% ^% J T% y
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before- ?' t. e" L- @; M- s1 F9 @' j
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
7 w# E( H- S) ypeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise( z3 Y& j& |+ a4 w
apartments are the way to go? No.
* h' ?* V( x: b " u% z; J6 g3 M5 H. a8 |
- r: L; E( @. h- t
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the. i& j# [/ r- K: B1 ?( ]
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
7 `; V3 u) k. R9 \'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make) S" {1 e7 \' K5 A% x
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
. I3 `1 e2 X* N; ]5 H7 y1 Qfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant- a) M6 W) ]+ Q- S3 w
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
6 ^. n5 M6 Z% e- U5 tBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is" H( ]8 w) s: G( c ]" l
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|