服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6523|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ( x5 A+ q0 s& a# q* l, garchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider* j0 j8 B) x0 I; \$ U0 ~/ H0 N( S Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian", z0 M# B+ Z% N2 F* A city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 0 v2 R: s7 C! ZAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,; W0 ?! p4 I; b- T: ] 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of* S! \5 r" ?! t* E, G. s Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within n; c5 Z9 ~* z) o( R( Q2 i hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among + C* U+ c R) Z7 v3 peach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera " H: _& J7 s, pand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is- V3 [5 p, X, @0 k8 l* [ harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are / \) n, Z; K4 s8 ldescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and! n# X& C/ X) @/ F) d9 o forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I- i3 p2 H; I; x: t was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great" C& H: o: {& F impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, " a4 y; O) a, t. Nand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong # N% E: F# Q, s" |4 A3 K' D6 n+ Ghas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 0 p7 J9 a7 O7 |- d1 g# P+ [2 Lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that % @% R6 E/ N! ~) R! ]( P7 @no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are9 p9 v \7 l' H, E8 @# x$ q) k- } only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a) B: Z0 u7 E2 f4 k$ x. q& N3 c; K sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ' i, j# n5 v9 f Nwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ; }! e' |# N$ G+ Ito the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is- s" s; `1 e% i! g# ]) Z "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,- f3 b# j2 W! ?5 F* G$ I this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are# A) \1 r; C2 D still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 0 W4 I" w A* u/ x"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make # u+ a6 w5 r! f/ R/ ]money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 5 ` u5 ~, t) da beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 4 p' w6 H* ?, d3 _parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across5 _2 a) u1 z. x the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural! S$ S2 q0 b* k$ I" c4 z8 b, s importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 0 l' U3 p% `$ a9 g5 ddevelopment.

Hutongs) O$ w3 [+ K" H% s0 r8 M in the old days were residential area where people actually lived * p, e& ?' y3 M7 i) O) [there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions- O! j& {' w# g6 B0 c in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 6 j0 \6 ~1 B/ _& M2 Thave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you , X3 b# O7 ~2 F2 ?2 {will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. : H1 V g; ~" wFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date+ r& Y2 K* Y: g% O to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ( i% z# p" J3 O( ^% Vto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses. @5 _' [2 J: V& R support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically+ Q/ z ]) z8 j unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to& e: H/ k& O, W live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose," o' g" f+ V) b0 r- p hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the: A# t$ H- O* [ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 2 I" u, h# r* \4 Zproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 4 K0 [) w; `# }0 Qrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong; ~' z" r* D! }- q$ q$ |5 |. H# J Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 2 D7 V$ d/ V- V" [6 N- Fpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be3 c8 _% E3 z' b! Q L$ h torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 3 z- }( X( z3 ?memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"./ \# ?" G/ X# r$ G5 c/ ~) ~$ f Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are' L7 N1 @6 F( i# u aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially1 b, M1 Z6 H* q4 l u. A. s! h non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image, q5 ^: @+ H3 z/ \: a of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 7 C9 p; a# Z" Y) `7 NHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those X- W5 C9 h0 l) I( \+ Npeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they" d7 c Y1 ^3 ~! h! ?+ ]/ ]0 h may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some+ P$ c) ^2 y, j7 j of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 3 z( R" ]* l6 h, i1 g- Z5 p' U"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 4 q5 Q9 x9 Q' c, ~: Npeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise* w. N ?4 F& z( @6 |! K apartments are the way to go? No." G$ j3 ]; y& j/ t# b% F 3 q9 \- ^0 s; V0 ?8 H2 r- i / B3 C8 y/ t/ b1 R. y ~5 z3 s

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the, d# I5 p% _, w( O; k situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ' Y' u7 V- T* ]0 o% T, s @'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make, | ^. }& H- M no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so) _, C1 e- \+ { fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant $ K6 Q1 r# Q& y3 z+ B# P dresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless8 }! @% l$ t( K, G3 W5 W4 e. ~7 ~ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is * G* N A7 j- y% Nunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-20 17:53 , Processed in 0.120725 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部