UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its3 w2 f7 F( a3 ^, M
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider6 P9 i0 w- A% V8 K
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
4 Z1 k( y& C2 N/ w0 Ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.2 G. y9 A' c" s) _
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,( r9 s& c- N. C5 I z( R
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of" l/ q; [" H y: E) }% N( v) T
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within( K, i( I" K( k6 i3 x' B
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
; m5 W. z' r2 h4 k) Z/ n+ Leach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
0 r$ v8 U+ i) _2 |6 @. N/ Q( band Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is2 h4 i7 `9 a( K3 o$ \
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
+ [* H6 A# g: j! S" [2 idescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
. r% m' D% V( C! mforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
0 l' n( _$ T1 ]was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
& a3 {, l* ~3 t o- ~impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,2 O4 }# }! q, S5 d) B% ~2 L
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
/ Z1 V* v+ z0 S( h& R5 Thas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
- ^0 ]; q B$ U3 ?) yof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
0 C5 O: i8 A& i2 E. s3 V" X( d( V2 Dno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
( c# _5 s7 `( \* L1 F2 gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
; ?" k$ x$ N q% @" |- k: Vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government t4 u3 w$ i/ W/ X
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move1 E$ X& i6 J( \2 k& H5 f$ V
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
# o3 Q' W$ @0 S9 D"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 O3 Q. T: r3 |' j
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ ?, K0 Y. W7 v) O( ?
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
7 i. `) n X t3 h1 z"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ J; R9 d1 i0 c/ Z- e
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. f9 ?4 Q) y. S2 E6 v. b0 @8 s1 B
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a" z+ o! _, [1 f2 m( y
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
, o3 r* D3 W/ X' |the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural& t- G( u d5 i! x( f
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for( Q6 ?5 q* B1 z
development.
Hutongs
7 g* a) P7 t$ n) n# cin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
0 n2 l2 w6 I! A6 w4 U5 {$ Sthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
+ r% C, E# \' ?3 B! m5 Sin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not+ V$ z7 M0 N0 T3 [, H- |% ?% o" s
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
! o1 K$ N7 U8 B' Q9 `will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
) I7 {, B( c8 Q9 `2 z1 @Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
% Z0 N: p6 _3 M8 o# y' |# zto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
$ [$ W; x0 [, qto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
9 q: k0 J$ ~3 e( ]support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
6 K; o* p0 w& s8 g! l& eunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
% B( J/ x) P7 Wlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
! C, ]6 Z- V% \+ L% f: C' C7 l3 O3 yhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the! d) O# L" S3 o/ N/ D4 Q" U
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the: {& ]1 T8 a) [# \
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be0 e5 k) c7 E; g2 @, H. W$ i3 R( Y
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
: ?8 e- M+ i6 r+ Z8 a: d& [; ^Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
7 r" r* T6 J# q5 Rpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
# l& c# Z% A3 O3 U% Q* n7 z7 Y3 ktorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
5 b- G6 q2 `8 `# k( ] Qmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".4 g. b* @0 e" Z) ?: a* i3 v
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are) V2 i; d/ |9 v# ^
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially: c; U. x- w: \) \$ Z. J( z2 g
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image1 B) _: C- @& v* T7 E+ w; t w
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
4 E4 A- o% d0 KHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
2 `' F% g4 Z: q E& ^' Ppeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
' S* k! w8 g/ @, X, R& Ymay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
, O1 ?/ Q. y1 H& t! S+ q1 kof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
" f6 i8 ]1 g4 x( Q5 w5 h. S# |) M"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all5 d4 S( L" s- F$ w
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
2 y6 M2 j) I/ U5 N$ {& ]apartments are the way to go? No.( [' h; e( t" g$ u' n
' r: ]" [; X- Q3 J+ [$ Y/ i$ F
0 f% @6 ?1 u7 E5 r9 F9 O
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
! E% C/ ]+ N+ [+ Ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
% E4 ^ {/ }- V, E7 t- N'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make4 P! V3 M! @$ X
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
1 g7 `( P( b% p/ g& ?+ _, kfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
! q7 @: @8 N2 m/ L, I4 j T4 S' Oresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
( @: `# }; T' lBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
7 E# }. @# `3 j. m( q, l0 p7 Aunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|