服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6517|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its/ i- L! J- R' B2 A( f3 L architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 0 u9 @& ?4 w- n4 tBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian": A; S) i; }7 H- Y$ @6 R city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.) p. j) p" i9 s" b# d& S According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ; e/ U! ~6 k7 _9 Z8 e9 t; }3 V3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of* B6 _: q2 C3 o0 b: N A5 Q Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 1 T7 | }% v) Q0 l5 d) m* a1 uhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 5 B( N& v: j& r/ J, Zeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera' o2 R* s! e5 W. R& D* ?: W and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is . u9 ~. P; L$ e) o5 {5 X) Nharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are X7 S0 I7 ~& Q# N& D3 S+ gdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and. N) c. T, I. x7 K# Q U forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ( y# G9 ^4 b1 K1 N0 Qwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great/ _4 z9 j9 Q" }. Y impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 6 `! ~4 z9 m0 E3 y, J7 w4 E( `and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong : M# x1 Z9 o( v6 O( e- u9 Lhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment, y S) z$ j. ?. X3 ` of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that9 `2 D) K6 Q+ d! s no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are' X1 B; I: R4 X# X4 n6 Q4 ^ only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a T* F% ~8 e) q) Fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government : E) I4 \2 B# q j; x" Lwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 7 U; F* s! {$ z% M1 L* o( ato the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 6 i5 h, v; T/ z* J d"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 o j2 H' ` F9 z1 P* r: C$ l this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ! g& @3 o; ~# R( `- j8 ystill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to $ h7 }* C1 }/ w" m6 d6 v"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make6 x: s& G8 _7 y( U1 \) E money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, h. F" \ `7 {8 o/ \3 g5 B7 W a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: U; y# j' n; k1 K' W parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across, \ h$ {* w4 b# d) S the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ( _& j/ s* @$ D: o- Y+ |3 qimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 2 T/ u2 l7 |5 Wdevelopment.

Hutongs 8 U/ O3 [; I' ~" @) A! Lin the old days were residential area where people actually lived7 K% u6 K4 @" R% ?8 ^" p+ _; n there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions * Y! F7 t4 x* n* B( Fin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not . U/ i2 D4 F8 G! V4 A7 Q5 Whave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 0 G7 |! T/ X/ E5 h! ywill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.; K# E$ q N% a Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 F: o7 i+ X# o3 ? to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 5 v0 ]* l4 n. G4 z7 y1 c! qto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ]* y! a$ I+ X! b+ n) M/ A support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 9 E) I, H6 e: S8 G p( \; Vunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to M6 u( S3 U7 ^6 Y0 q live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,9 H9 M3 z- Z/ Z0 K4 A3 y1 g/ i! |; w hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the) O* q( I0 J2 p+ \# t0 T balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ' r0 o- E7 \! h* \( J- kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ! Q/ @0 F Q( W& [% }renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong * w! M% M4 d7 ?( N8 fMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how$ b, b$ A7 I5 K" E% E people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be- P5 q8 E8 C& ~2 W; C torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished # v# A( O7 i8 ^( d+ S% q2 X3 }memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".! B. X# C& B, d/ C3 b( r" R3 n2 [4 @1 _ Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are! J( l" V+ S" c; k' J" Z. ? aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially * h) T% Y" X& ^# ?# I- G. ?, [non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image" w* U6 p! X& \4 O of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these9 F' C+ {" X/ f5 a Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those% y' ] @) H* }) I; H: ^' Z4 M people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 0 m* V/ i9 ^0 s5 p: j) Mmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some+ }1 g* H: V$ d; B$ q8 t# y9 X& u of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before & _3 \9 q3 q. t+ F1 i6 A: A% p"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all8 U5 H5 @5 m2 F* k4 r people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise : B( F: t7 ^3 D, \9 J1 k/ e! Tapartments are the way to go? No. ! f2 U7 v8 O5 N4 ]* O . a; R" l C3 q! K) I1 g$ L2 @/ h + v1 t7 I5 a8 B* w# \

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the4 B( p5 R1 T7 O situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this$ K2 J1 @. {) L3 _/ Z6 l 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make % G# U+ q" \/ D/ Kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so' r' M' d% x& Q5 D7 k0 I fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant - C/ f8 s5 d( L8 k/ N6 Z5 Xresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless - j) G# t5 S j. YBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is. X5 x7 K6 W6 `8 g4 b: ~( f unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-20 04:25 , Processed in 0.130845 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部