UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
, q7 ~' X' P8 K) s( ~architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider m0 F" a1 D' g% f! H4 M
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"* p' Y! I" H% W5 n
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.& ?1 _8 u `6 c( F7 r' F4 Y5 G
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,2 R( \" P; G, h
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
8 ?' ]( l5 P+ B; c/ P- z% N( IManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within& n% z- R; A3 k% Q) M
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
L7 h. V( T) C# Deach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera/ Y" d/ z* N5 u1 w% R, G
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is( u$ L& z4 J/ ~( H1 `" e5 C
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are: H9 e7 [; R* w+ l7 R5 l$ O4 H
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and2 S: L' p3 u- G5 U3 f( ]
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I6 R9 O) u3 `9 M3 O
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
# u8 c2 B8 m7 U0 Mimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,% U0 j1 P; Y; C8 T- i0 G
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong% S6 [7 f$ y6 p2 G
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment& p I+ u7 \- _) B& q% d
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
5 S( O I# Y' Z. Z yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are, O# |- b: d7 o4 @- m" N
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a" \" x) N& @; C
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government/ i* f x7 |( T8 w) X
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move4 ~# ~& d, j# `: r, X
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
% N. i7 \ l3 s) p+ |3 t0 \5 h"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
) ]. E2 P, Y: Q7 athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
# D: }+ a! M3 u: Istill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
# L8 A; d9 x5 X# [# ~"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
/ l( M4 a5 q; Omoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
0 x# R$ e: `( w* w! g' }a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
/ d& |, V( n* D! T' \1 Pparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
2 g, T. b8 u( m Q: s! bthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural& K8 v# n0 i0 A* J6 ?
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; [3 N; e7 i/ X* X
development.
Hutongs
9 o" j- ~# f0 Y4 {7 R; Yin the old days were residential area where people actually lived* v7 N& x, t9 X8 H. X
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 i5 ?. U4 o& F
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
" B8 q9 Q0 T' R l4 z1 Ihave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
2 ?. F; L6 l- z( |/ o) ~/ G7 Awill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs., y- N5 d7 ^( D( r0 Q/ g! w
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
9 s% `0 n8 y4 B% D8 ]& E# ~5 Qto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
: G' {/ J+ u" Y; Fto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
; D- F6 @, \ ~# s& k! psupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
. E2 L! Q" n9 v) M# A/ b; aunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
/ Q# Z( C; M( a* X [0 Ulive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
# K8 I6 |* D% P8 Q) Ghutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
$ P( N' i+ Y$ N( D$ z- abalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the+ q* E( F( a* e/ t/ O4 k
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
! V S! ]5 c/ _$ v2 ^$ rrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
( d. `2 ^- W* b1 c6 N, UMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
3 v$ k% o* j& Y. Ypeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be6 U7 F4 i- A7 @2 K
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished; {+ m9 S; k* u7 r( M& P# A+ a
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".6 \, J; V1 \) c
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
* F. B1 C4 a7 t7 T7 e! Caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially5 d* r; F' Y; y* J- ^5 g
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
+ [& u( `+ s3 K, {1 kof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
) v# J; D# {% s: nHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those$ S: L( q$ b0 L
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
5 B+ u. U6 A, G4 P3 M4 p: imay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
# _+ S) S- c5 g* ?3 n. C/ tof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
# C) V3 O+ I9 l5 C! }! O"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
0 F+ |* M5 r$ S+ jpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 ^2 w% M! }8 G2 c! Y/ J! P
apartments are the way to go? No.# i a4 J3 g, o2 d9 \. ?
7 b6 f; F7 @; G / W1 P H. |# ]2 Z6 D/ b; @2 k: f
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
( {" N) m. [* N# l. e7 f+ A5 M) Msituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this% z w7 N& p5 ^ k7 ]* x; \- y$ L
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make! o& g8 K& x& f! z' ^7 g5 R
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so) C( J1 p% h% I0 }$ I- P G
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
3 _8 x3 W+ Y* J. N8 f1 Y( L+ z' g1 Oresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
+ N2 M& \& @: K& p( y; ]3 S$ dBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
' |9 \' n& F/ Y7 Z' sunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|