UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its( W$ |! q E0 Q0 u. h2 \3 }
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider9 a# e+ c2 T5 d
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian") n' D! {! ~4 L+ x( x9 X- I0 K) N
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.5 R' H* K+ r# T
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
2 B" F3 `, W9 Z5 N3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
) a R* u$ ^/ }/ ^+ a6 F6 m! @Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
6 v2 M( O0 H S( {! \) C7 Uhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
! c& R8 ?, \$ seach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera2 z7 N* w2 k G4 a( Q, B
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is, }- {1 a8 C6 I6 i
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
. g& Q9 r- v0 C# N: t# sdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and; s6 x* R) }1 B/ [$ |: M( T! y
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I1 J# b" y' e' S, f2 w
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
4 u. U, C/ U, [/ Q) Bimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
0 ^! T5 U. N' g. R7 |and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong* f% x+ E# v2 ?' a b
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment2 ]1 g9 Z: Y |' B; r
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that) A/ o( K7 B5 W
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
0 S+ N0 r+ f9 ]1 x7 _only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a1 t4 k, k4 J( w* y
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government/ _+ m# D5 _5 x, a% u* P" o, c" o: r
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
& q) P3 L2 Z/ T3 Ato the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is3 ~4 O1 V s: r( f0 ^6 ]. U s
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,: s+ i- n+ J* C9 _# m; R" D: [
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are3 `/ B. I4 t1 ^9 Y/ O
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
2 l! z7 V, N3 |' U" U: l( |( Q/ {. s"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
& `* U+ C8 w! E- i+ j% t# _1 @4 \money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' e2 E' |$ N+ o) E
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a! L6 X {- ~- Q# G; f" b& R: M
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 x0 b. X" H" N4 W2 f( A
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
. e) Y# N* w, y4 t( X4 B$ Qimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; ^( h, ^1 n. j! j5 T" ?
development.
Hutongs
& \$ O. V7 `& S( t# Fin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
- \- @7 [ n2 q( a+ dthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
. A' y# y3 @) ~6 h; [: Hin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
$ v1 x8 u0 t. |2 S- i/ g7 _8 K; H9 Q; D/ Xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
( c3 r ?3 z1 u9 P# vwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
; p2 }" ~3 B: X# FFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
5 }( n s% e# d8 x" ?3 \2 Eto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
+ x8 s- v0 p7 \7 U! k F& Rto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
" W: s8 j& q3 z8 M, |+ Q+ zsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically: M+ o; @& E' N9 e: T1 Y9 W- e/ j0 k
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to% q9 d: z; ^ z& N
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,2 N& G# }. V% d! B! Z7 l
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the) b( l @. j3 H3 H
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the9 A- ]4 M3 J4 w% L0 O7 T& f! [* u }. M/ ]
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
7 u& c$ Z0 z7 B! j0 frenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong' D V3 L8 O0 C4 y1 y$ r& i2 b/ a
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how& J& `, z+ @1 C! ~
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
" G( V; J+ U& `. Z) k' `6 @; vtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
1 h1 d, E; u$ k$ }' Z4 z' t. u( fmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
. n- G/ t9 j- KNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are1 Q3 F; Y9 H# |2 Q* j
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
/ k. R: t) U1 Anon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image+ u* R7 B: V# J6 h" F0 j Y# r
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* z& a1 x, A/ ~% _- S n
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
1 @9 H, N7 x: Y! c5 L1 g% hpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
^# h; e: h$ i9 j) I: e9 Gmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
" k, v+ Z* v: n1 ]) \5 R3 Q) jof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
' o6 L% v2 C# r" B" e* ?' e"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all; ~2 d/ @- N7 `$ W
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 Y- c% `/ E* \" i
apartments are the way to go? No.) m* s7 j5 v) a3 K+ T) _. T. l7 f
9 f3 E; J& K3 z- W0 v N: R: F : q" x5 z* O7 w M, u& v9 T
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
; @* q1 d' _9 usituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this6 N7 k9 u+ x4 t" Y
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
2 ~; S; F9 `( L' g+ Kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
8 p5 L/ x) ~6 Qfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
4 c# G! Y, c+ I0 _- a1 ?2 ~" vresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless+ z; ?/ R. [$ m- m- e. i
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
k( u1 e+ X: c$ cunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|