服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6445|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its( C4 Z% e: C, r% q% }/ X architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider( Y* I5 d9 x: ~% e6 q Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" - E( h5 T! V) E% V1 n) g* i! M ~' Rcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.2 g8 I0 ^: _0 x& j0 A According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,3 C! P+ u# E! h1 a+ {% X; q$ V 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 9 h9 Z* n! z/ dManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within+ ~9 A3 J0 h' S$ t: n hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among - l. T; q, p$ q. s- }4 Zeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera/ c7 T x$ X# C) l and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ) Z) U; \3 [; Tharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are D! W! ]% |) {7 x- Z$ n, d descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and. Z5 @. s# P! K+ |. V" w forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 2 h8 c4 T) w, E! ywas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great" s. Z! w( R# U/ g3 m: K impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,0 j8 R8 Q) K% I4 w7 V! @, p8 z2 {- [8 N and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong + z$ B) {, L, P; q& q5 ?4 ?has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 3 a. x/ R; V9 C1 U- @5 Pof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! m2 s6 e! B6 Q& j8 Y# U/ @0 I no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are , b0 O }* u8 G+ d- |) T6 ?5 Ionly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a) g$ k" h# j+ D0 S' M* W sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government + r3 m7 ^! l; d8 X4 rwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move # g6 _5 U3 K0 e0 Y9 {" Cto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is: O( s0 ?+ h) a1 O: O! p0 D" } "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 2 u- ?+ p, u: n; _% wthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ' d0 ]1 |. n: J, @2 V. Kstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to + x/ t! k& w t: r; |"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make % T5 C* B. s, a! d0 Bmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was : I2 R* [, c0 l6 Y2 g0 \. E3 [a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a& j) y6 W& [5 U2 w2 l# e: M parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across & _3 c' Z4 R2 v b3 C# P0 cthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural $ \+ _; y& M8 g* c; d6 C8 rimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! ^. G7 g, _- t- R2 V development.

Hutongs8 Q4 z$ W* F a. e in the old days were residential area where people actually lived " `% ~1 e/ E1 X' M5 h2 U2 O# n* J% Mthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 5 r5 `% s5 f0 d& v9 v( K" j! H# nin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not+ [ p W5 r. q* c y have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you( ~8 V* ]' x' h8 I+ R will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.3 P! I5 T- J& w7 ~' T Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date1 {' x8 l6 B+ K: q" T to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used0 k3 W0 y2 _! Q2 ?$ k to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ _3 u6 @( h3 z# W# V support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically * X& k- v4 X9 p9 M4 g: S# q1 _unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 1 A8 l8 u) M8 i7 V4 s: Wlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, " e# q3 N. [1 m' G5 r# @hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the: L, O1 ~ \8 {7 { balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the+ z) n/ j0 V* K project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 0 y$ n n( I! m1 `5 Lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 9 F2 b5 B- O( {, G# l6 IMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 1 p7 d. d! W* R) A+ ?$ gpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ) e' w1 d3 M4 u7 M0 e) qtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished L x* h* K: V. j; L4 W memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". + j9 K! B+ e9 Q/ f P$ xNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are6 ]0 \; R" O( ]$ w aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially - ]! o4 q! v# Z2 u- { G0 Nnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 1 P6 {& |4 }. A8 v. ?9 r) T3 b- Zof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these / b Y# y; _- s4 O/ Q5 G; eHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those5 {' O f$ S" ?7 K5 A9 M people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they- c) N4 _ k" i) E9 f may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some- V; ]( ~% b4 Q$ g4 S4 l/ @ of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before, M: L; i( u9 X+ j5 k "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all* ?4 X# _ `- H; p people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise * i; p! @+ t* s2 sapartments are the way to go? No.. i4 n1 S2 e- l % ^2 c+ ?% ?( m4 X ; ^7 o( y$ D9 M' P a) l% b

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 5 z; ^3 I1 R. d3 l( F; Hsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( @2 z G$ h! T+ R/ G5 o7 h'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make3 K5 G9 K5 Q1 ~. U no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 5 Z2 \* v1 F) R7 mfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant. I J* p* {- y% S resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless# r1 g% P4 Q/ @) ^4 n* n Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is; q& c5 {, Q3 B& U+ y unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-14 22:05 , Processed in 0.115188 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部