服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6504|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its$ N1 Q b; z: l architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider9 E8 k1 b/ B1 n# z2 c6 _ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 7 k, v) ^& M9 f' l8 `+ \city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.8 q" L) [2 E& L$ \/ ~ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, . I7 A( [. w U# ^( q3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of. S) M# X! z ?- Q+ \, { Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within/ q0 |1 s) c0 Q% ~8 K' u/ Q hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among' U N8 C) W; Q each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 4 e! q8 h6 Z$ ]and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is) r- t7 V8 ~6 \2 w' O$ S harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are$ h8 w; g4 P8 s/ v' I) |6 [. Y! W descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and - }5 G( ]& Z, G& [9 D+ P- {forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I * R/ z/ e, s, L$ R8 Y$ L7 j5 Cwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great _9 H* M) M- u |3 f5 limpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,( z" T% E3 c) T, z, ? and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- E* Q' ?- q, y& n has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment3 A& V' B: r* Z. v of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that( Q+ B3 P5 T9 M( \- x% @1 C no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 0 Z& Y: j- N6 G; `3 Z6 q" o6 zonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a# Z S3 B) `$ ?" s/ z sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government % h$ `" }) B/ e& ~3 uwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move+ X! M: j) D( I) J( y; [7 B to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 1 Q$ o" M$ B. ^ A& `"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,7 J v0 H' r7 u$ P this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ) z) {' j7 J$ T1 _$ s; }: b& P4 _still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to , D! e8 k& J* u! ^& c"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make" G$ ^" z9 H% W money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. E: b/ |6 X6 m& I3 v* b a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a3 f. C/ h; ?* l- k/ i$ e parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across( A3 W7 o8 u5 G% M: m* J the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural- {6 A& d& k7 [! i" q8 V importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for # }0 y8 [5 e8 t* i' Pdevelopment.

Hutongs5 |6 I% b- H! c( j9 I/ F9 o in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 7 u) Z k6 j! y6 L; kthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions . @; w2 b5 D3 J# Fin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not2 I" |: m5 c$ D( V2 N! w have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you y+ D: d; H g. v/ }$ b3 ~ will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.% w) M4 C6 f: E' d: V. r7 h( m4 |4 o Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 4 X4 Q' V; T) K7 Q; F) gto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used . T- F7 r8 @3 P* Fto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ' h! `5 p- x* z, u3 m+ Z5 tsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 1 m- I) g1 H1 }1 g0 E2 O1 m+ cunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 2 Y" F4 ]3 f( a- Flive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,8 a2 g( K0 h7 B4 ^) p( C# H hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 2 ?' U4 z0 K+ ~4 t9 d l4 N" wbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the & u4 \8 ?5 f% G# V4 @9 A8 |project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 1 j3 s0 L2 ~3 H. |. d! ]5 F& Jrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong0 r) _2 l6 B; \$ j/ }% c6 r' L$ @- i Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how3 i& ]2 R# U& W- a people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be' [7 @2 l0 ]: _$ a7 c1 l( m6 v torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished, d" h$ W$ {& y# Q memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".% k: d7 O& k# |" @! _0 Y Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are1 J( C, D/ }+ I1 }5 T aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially& q7 l3 E' N \5 z non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 1 z$ t2 E$ K! n% T1 A4 Tof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 7 ? R6 \4 `% u* y' qHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ! V! q9 e: a, F8 npeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they" d9 f1 B8 |5 L' x$ y d& X" D may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some! b: ]9 K- j% q; N- { of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 9 f% ]" \. j$ ^# u"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all$ n6 d2 V v5 }! B people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise( Y. E6 K0 p8 C* V apartments are the way to go? No." V" [7 v# D! r; l, Q( D! l . u* J% ?2 ~% W( M J/ n $ ]# T+ q% x) }- m, a

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the" m2 q. q) z$ y! O* S5 T1 A situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 9 ]# a. _/ Q% A$ m7 ~'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make8 m/ ?9 K; a0 C4 \$ o. \# Q4 X5 ? no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so- Y) C# ~2 Q6 `$ f) D+ c fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant : `' r& j1 U9 y( p+ _, M' gresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless4 r3 l# S' R& L4 a: g" ? Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ! [7 _% X+ N, x" n: Vunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-19 02:33 , Processed in 0.126348 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部