服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6409|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 9 V4 [+ D/ G% D( N4 H; c% ]architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider * z/ J; N$ \5 H" nBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" $ g+ H! z" Y+ x! n) {3 Z9 F1 K+ a3 jcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture." [" {# f. [4 _8 \% k, t5 D) H" b According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ) q3 W8 ]+ x' F+ p n; E! E! r3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 4 [& ^- ~6 n1 a& wManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ! X$ @4 N! w1 f& R! {& A3 n, ]9 _3 yhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among7 k3 h& Y9 d/ v" E3 G: r' v; c: r each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera- E) p. V$ Q S+ x0 ?( G8 F and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is # G2 u( a# o. b8 d8 c% A+ a5 pharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are R, C6 b; p9 V' V& X. b descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and . x& w' h& }; T3 bforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I% I3 C3 L9 d0 b/ `9 J' f: M+ \ was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great9 q0 [$ L7 Z; l2 G1 N) Y& N" Y! R; v impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished," D D! H/ E. y0 ~" `, q" G and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong/ ~# s& T) u& I has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment " [7 D6 b2 g7 G- B G% `2 Uof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that % I$ v. D+ ^: |8 C% J, }no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ; N) a3 @7 x1 f& e1 s6 h4 ponly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a/ S* Q* M! {( a2 h! G5 a sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 9 J: K1 o: c8 R: ywant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move + i. m) \, i2 [- \) Y, i' ~7 dto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is; E- f% |2 M8 l "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 3 a* |% L1 u$ w9 T3 athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are3 J* n7 f( I: `" J! |! x still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to% n- g5 `) w* K+ v- {0 ^, | "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make# j# p9 b" {7 ]$ a" n! [& Q money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ; |$ K2 p+ X# W3 x* `a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a# _3 x/ ]+ R3 Y% s! q8 W/ _7 S. x7 o parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across L- {$ L; F9 C- j6 s, vthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural # y5 |5 }$ f$ u L0 i1 V/ m: pimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for9 T. Q' c& k" E( C, ` development.

Hutongs# P* Z4 i8 t' A# z/ w in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 7 Y2 @5 u& d% c$ I5 j8 U7 Ythere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions0 s9 D; @) N0 Z, n in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not" F, o& l3 I9 V5 g have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 3 A: T2 w) f- E) A; {) Zwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.7 h* \3 j3 ?* E# E Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date $ ^: M3 c1 p2 x3 l% Mto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used: \# @5 S* z/ x1 V! W6 Q1 o- U$ S to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ; I; r2 L, N4 Esupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically' E9 m) P6 q. e# I unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to % X# z# ?! E3 S5 s/ M7 T1 ^live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,) N& R& W: f0 C! \, `7 x hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the7 x6 I( q. v$ I, d% q. ] balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the/ \$ c U5 p4 k6 i5 o project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be6 m+ ]# N2 j. F2 \" m. }8 a renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong & }( w: X+ W0 H1 Q' J9 |9 jMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how/ Y& K8 X( Y! o2 { people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 0 N4 _3 e9 j' ^9 E) [! }" Dtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ) q9 s2 u2 e3 W" h- Amemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"." u$ Z/ o' E) l6 e Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& P/ H) N2 h/ T7 x3 i$ x aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially * ^$ L6 i# d& r7 n4 }3 e' unon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image $ d6 T5 e9 u/ k3 W. Cof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ! C5 }/ m; G( E3 ^0 M3 iHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those% N" D' Y& C/ c o people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they! B$ l; j! c3 Q& F- s+ n, d/ u$ B may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some. w- p4 Q4 c9 }! T7 Y T of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 2 K% g. b) v9 M- R2 T"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all( _ y8 t( e6 K: U people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- U9 X) U! A- ~$ c* {. o0 {6 W apartments are the way to go? No., B6 A5 p; U, f' l3 J 1 p; v. ^. C2 w ) {- \3 C2 B" M( Q7 o: m

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ( S& I5 e; m8 [8 Y( isituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this+ e5 Z$ K: ?- _' S* x* U 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 5 }$ A: a! I5 l# vno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so/ N$ O6 W2 M- M& u9 E fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 6 y( W. w3 ?0 |& [resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless# u2 k6 O2 L+ q7 z; D- c Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is/ v. g6 q; H0 ^( n! R! R- L) p unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-12 16:38 , Processed in 0.132214 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部