UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
2 I( x" @. ]' q. \, y% sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
( d/ @: A- f WBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
/ s6 h9 a, ]* J" Ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
" \) v* j5 s ?* N3 yAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ~5 j4 @! c% D
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
, }& {% m: c6 N2 }/ e ~Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
6 o E" c% g/ P4 _hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
3 G' \5 ^& V2 E8 G/ U4 u9 Beach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
* P9 A* K8 ]0 j- p4 Aand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
. B/ ]+ @; ^ v$ q o: dharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
% p9 |9 g; r8 q$ vdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
z* q% p+ ~4 R- U- A* h5 Q: K6 f! rforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I* U0 E7 b0 e* Q
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
& N+ _- P* \9 q* X# P/ v+ ~9 Fimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
# L% j, c3 L- y4 B2 Gand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong# x) R5 d7 b3 |$ q
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment: D) U9 F5 P* k$ x) t0 E6 T5 o5 A
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that# n9 `. b8 a: J$ {! e
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
/ ?1 x1 D6 Q3 t. B. E8 @6 jonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
2 H- ~. i7 h0 {sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
6 f0 i8 w) k7 M) Z' i7 {want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
; m( t8 O- S9 q/ tto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is l8 D8 P6 J5 [, h2 U
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,& D$ e4 c, z& s4 e s* h8 S
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are$ i* q# ? O+ R# [4 S+ `$ O* }2 _
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
. c6 x$ _- L; t# Z+ p; V6 o"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
: W; j p5 ^& Q* omoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
/ I0 j) h* A, F5 r, F# Ja beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
# h- d, h! C3 _, Aparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
! {5 s5 y: Q. ?) \- q8 Cthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
1 u9 ?# c* p2 B6 y# [5 m% y4 m/ ^importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for+ N" x9 n! x4 j5 G, [
development.
Hutongs
% X/ ^% p8 y) k- A5 Tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
5 s1 {4 e: I( G5 K, S7 dthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
2 q9 [; ?1 H, |9 d% y+ q. Nin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not$ m9 \4 p8 G* I/ y4 l
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
2 K+ l+ \2 z' s& y: i5 q/ C1 awill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.( ?- s+ t F, k+ o
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date$ Z3 P, G2 Y; f! M B5 }: r( A/ f1 j
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
, ~6 \+ Q) p/ i9 x4 u$ r; Qto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
' J; _4 e Q; K: H" s2 C6 gsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically( v& ?" Z$ t. c
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
5 X) c. P4 g5 u! Q( zlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
0 g p5 R, K3 t r% [( I# }hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
7 c; G/ K. i' a6 X8 }$ `& _! @* Q+ pbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the0 d3 e8 w* g. `5 i, o+ Q( h3 g7 r
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
9 P6 v, g5 v+ Y9 q: i brenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
D( a. ~* h2 t7 n# m: O: qMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
0 w6 |* x, M! g+ ?people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
$ _: K. D8 t/ [' G4 F, ptorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
. s0 D0 x' ]0 u# tmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
4 Z8 f/ m$ B. j. U4 BNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
9 l" w2 h O$ z' h% }# Saligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially2 ^# I ]$ W4 Z* U
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
+ w. g9 I0 I9 W Mof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
, ]3 L/ Z. r+ RHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those( ]' k1 S1 R y: A* B
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
0 k* ^1 ]$ t# L0 J* ^' ~may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
, `. b% c# X i4 E% fof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
. w$ t9 I9 `- P+ B. ]"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all! h& Z- |/ O& F6 O' S
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
* H" w/ y0 v: m" ^9 i3 T- ]! Dapartments are the way to go? No.6 ^' [7 N$ q( w; S1 P& R8 f
* N- s! E# I. X* v5 q. L
2 `- N/ }' L) w
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the% d4 s1 A7 S9 l: ?6 E9 \
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this3 J9 k. m3 R, T$ v7 O! [
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make! i6 U* ~* O9 p6 T6 g" J& d" F
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so& C! n. s" j7 ]: a
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant" _- x4 t: g b- T# l
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless. ~- z3 D( N3 \6 I ]
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
6 D* A n, e% c U) xunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|