UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
4 F5 |3 p/ ]- I5 rarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
; i5 ]5 [' {" [" xBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"* l7 Z7 W. J2 ^, N9 N4 t! e2 o
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.5 P6 n7 b# ^+ W3 C6 W+ V$ T; ]
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,: s M! v& J1 e; x- M; ~- F
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
. c0 I7 q: g+ s! ?9 GManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
5 W% s2 e: v$ r9 chutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among" Y6 |+ l# @- |3 L2 r/ P% t: n
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera, H7 X2 ?! M) X& o; q+ U7 [8 G& D
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is8 u/ f" F; G; K2 t1 M' I
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are- m! o9 B: r3 I% N( k
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and+ y0 R+ [' b" y! h2 X3 e$ ?
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
; _/ @& Q9 O1 Uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
4 _2 y1 ?* v( w) M% }impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
9 ^1 m) M Y2 T- ^' v! B3 Q, I8 [and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
+ o _6 \, d+ ?& S' ^has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
. x' O2 G/ X# t* \2 {- Lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
% ]) a9 ~. ?6 {' H- Nno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
9 |% M9 F9 |5 C* bonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a4 w* M$ a8 F1 }- d- ?" y, |
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
3 D# L+ c1 [5 b; M2 M( v7 @7 q8 dwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move2 {7 q) a3 k- @0 o9 Z
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is' Y+ M, N! v; @: i
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
( C- ~% x6 V3 b# y( tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
0 l9 ?7 l' P3 ~5 A3 h8 I2 estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to2 v( w9 q' H8 y1 s
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ^% i5 {; n5 ^- N
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
- n+ j6 ?0 \7 ?8 u9 D, Ra beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a3 i4 r7 c$ Q( [) o! S: N
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
* k9 ?" Z/ A9 c dthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
( Q3 c7 ?+ z# simportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for1 O6 q+ c) t$ ~" N
development.
Hutongs
" E( B0 r- ]/ _7 i0 i3 B. Sin the old days were residential area where people actually lived' H: H2 E' H& Y3 [ K1 s9 {
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
0 H4 _" u1 \, b- {! v9 min hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not8 u) O5 p$ z, D$ k y6 i- G# M
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
% O4 `6 M* K+ L8 W4 rwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
" h" }7 t$ z( I' C/ I2 ~Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
: ]# \' M% \" H. j7 Z. I8 vto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
1 b, p% G0 M- S9 J: C Fto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ @- l; l8 C0 i% Z
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
' ~& [6 P$ V: C# K$ Funfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
( v% ^, s+ x8 m7 W( ilive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: p( P0 ^8 Z b$ N
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the1 f4 [# u! O: m P$ @
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
4 ^! \* W1 y3 dproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
5 P* l. W$ s7 i5 irenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong) h4 p/ d* U$ @1 ^$ a/ h- u
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
& k7 }, f, C- V( n6 M/ \' kpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be, ~3 E! M+ N9 C g+ _$ t
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
* D% r' s i7 I# i% Wmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
. I4 I8 E$ X; ^ T% DNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
+ g# ~% A+ [, G# ~aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
$ Q- T+ d" X* K% s5 dnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image/ J* O+ P7 q l! u. W: o1 \! _6 _5 E' @
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these1 b+ S( T; Z, E( S) y9 z/ j! R
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
8 L+ K& [5 F h8 e/ A8 b" [+ ^people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they' y8 w6 K. v9 v1 |
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some( E1 S. {( ?1 Z% f+ W
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
- n2 G: P0 `0 S8 k4 i# t"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all6 X! k. u4 Z8 ?& r( R
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
: L2 z/ d4 s' }apartments are the way to go? No.( s" b+ m9 h$ l0 w, U
& W! J' K2 a/ w3 Q( X! n
4 [2 a- B7 O7 V9 o1 A8 V
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the; H& ^5 }- _7 Q$ V2 D w$ A
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this" J# R; J* m5 U+ S
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
5 W% Q! W) K* u( m7 B u9 bno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so6 ^) h7 i" T$ M$ J7 k/ z' z
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
' \. {* u# n cresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless- v- x, Z7 H8 N- V8 O
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is, i; N5 s# f5 r. S) ]
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|