服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6769|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its1 |4 J0 K6 p8 W: p architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider + E* V+ W/ C9 b2 p/ pBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"" p$ h% X& R r N- d5 X$ c city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. " [8 y, n* C7 {8 U) }7 MAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,' v8 A$ G! _. v% D8 n7 J/ V 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of2 _) ^& T4 z7 U% N! P+ {2 ^, y Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ' v0 D- G1 Q% Rhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among- R/ J3 M/ n# z7 o9 E) W each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera Z2 X3 G" w& w8 V# s. Q2 g- v and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is * }7 w& L$ V- z$ {harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are & D5 i, p! o* E) l# d Vdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and: a. Z! z9 Y6 `2 P: e& N forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I: m3 U- S' V6 ^2 M5 v0 I* r9 Z5 j was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great2 j+ f- R$ g- t' d. U impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,- H) Y# {8 Q# s a; H( r and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 0 i- I8 B) ?! H! ohas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 7 ~" m: M) B4 h" y6 {of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 6 U8 G* O" ]- ]9 b/ fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are - M ?8 `/ j. p$ l8 Fonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a . K" g' Z, W- I' Hsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 1 H4 |: d# Q; ~2 D5 ~% twant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move }4 h* h/ G- L* j; r* L9 a8 u to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& ~* `) c8 I% C! ~. H "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, : X) V3 V9 I3 F" v& Athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ ~" x8 Q8 n) p$ q- v/ R6 H still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 8 Q$ [+ B; U+ F: n2 P/ l"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ' _& q7 ? x& } R; s& Dmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was + _# x, E5 G( M. na beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a" X7 ^0 r3 ~0 A7 i+ m4 D3 L1 A parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across2 S; f1 X% B5 z& c. k& T the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural% p5 y0 ~9 F! S/ {2 h importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 s/ }; T( ?+ d development.

Hutongs- Q, H. u* `, f& g in the old days were residential area where people actually lived $ L& _% ~+ ?/ Tthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions; a$ K- i8 ^; R in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not3 r4 f7 X3 a3 i4 y% Y7 L have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you + |; @- I& [' C- ^- h. f6 F; pwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs., Q* u7 D% ^7 O t% \; v3 N Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date, U" ]) u6 ^1 [. R+ |( K: M to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used & D) z+ a. k& V5 w( m9 {2 N+ lto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses2 K0 A4 H# {# V f support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically : S6 a8 y2 ~$ sunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ! B, I8 Q2 @# h4 nlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,, s& x; ~! ~: a: h0 ] hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the M$ S w5 H+ z/ j Wbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the % b: N) s5 {& P1 h# y0 d" I9 N: `project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ?7 H1 ` T& N renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong0 ?+ c- E; l4 H5 n2 ?$ H! L- E4 k Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 2 f8 `( H" k) v+ i! \people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be. K' p( k4 o6 S$ _8 V torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished , {3 @ r- A9 L: p4 E; g' Vmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". W6 A( B% j9 c Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are * q; b3 L# W0 }' j6 daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially! D. E* c* H7 E: |7 _- k non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image & R. v3 J" C: g& A, `# u. Hof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these . X6 e0 h" p9 g! ~. oHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those- m$ G, L9 ~- R3 q( c people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they , [9 t" O! J$ D- I) z# {9 Mmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ' c# H A% I$ f k- k/ hof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ! Y5 B# I2 X) @- l"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 3 O9 b" S9 B: B" D Bpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise( B1 {$ ? v: T& u8 P apartments are the way to go? No./ p* ?, y. ]$ g- I& x8 ~6 q ( ?& v5 v8 t( N" j; ?1 f+ ~) i7 L . _; W. ~1 `- U4 E+ _4 ~1 w

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the1 D) D' B$ g6 U6 V% K situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ' f" O4 t5 j- ?9 ^3 ^, t+ `, G'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 2 [; {+ c/ B5 i- @: m8 Gno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ' r9 \' |- A# i$ T8 _fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant / X! y- n0 b/ b: }+ y g! [resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless( F& f5 l* s+ C# i3 w8 i: i7 E Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is % [: \, @6 T. w8 E. x7 i- z9 k. Dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-18 12:02 , Processed in 0.122884 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部