UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its. T R% ^5 a5 ]) h
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
4 C% f) b4 o( l8 K$ M+ S! EBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
. I* k, N$ |0 E! e9 qcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 U" Y' F7 r& B) W* g
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
- b7 K; {: d* q; u5 a3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
* E5 s+ h4 ]8 `3 MManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within q) k- X5 q9 |, F
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
* Q! H' H7 r' {* T" o/ Weach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
% L0 o* N8 ]7 t9 b' V. Zand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is, e) {4 y+ j0 q. o" T. k
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
% X) c) [- ?* z/ I7 W/ y$ edescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and4 ^; p1 V) ?6 {: U a$ }% i
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I; q2 n$ Q$ S# ^/ B$ i
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great# q* I U8 K Q
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
" B. r- Z1 W+ ~1 X7 D: F: k1 v( Oand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
. C% ~, l1 L: b5 `has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
% W2 G2 H4 m X" tof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that, h( P$ O% w2 l% [7 S
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
& i( D4 i/ U$ A" }/ Yonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
9 t' p+ U* w1 g' C" D7 C) z$ f5 Wsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
3 R1 \# T( y9 A- }0 ewant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- `) Z7 E& r7 T8 `
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
: t$ w- b( y. V1 q. t"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
/ T) t, x" E1 Z5 `* M9 s9 @this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
5 c& r5 K( f* p& ?7 G6 Mstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
, D6 X7 X: E- n; P& z"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make1 c- z+ d" k- U/ m4 ~' N- V
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
' h; N& h) b! ]1 q7 X* Aa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
- d+ p& \; R; l! F9 Y7 uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
, R& T: p# d" Ythe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
4 r6 G9 x8 K7 nimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for4 j6 r# v9 R- T
development.
Hutongs
2 O: W" v+ e# z! \ uin the old days were residential area where people actually lived' m( Z% Y' M; c0 [
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions) F& P9 x: e& Z& ]* }7 |
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
V( ?6 `: @% a0 Q& }have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
: {* i( O$ x% D* Lwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.2 T/ g5 |3 w, D: I U$ x
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
/ W' F( X* R/ ~3 Dto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used7 \' }6 K: X) s1 k% s4 B0 c& |
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
5 ]1 \7 {7 G" D3 ?0 E: Fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically0 b% B: ~! F- i
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to' y+ C( h# A3 @3 R) N# M/ y
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,5 g1 X& U- }6 }) x+ s- h
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
L3 `' {) R+ F! [7 X' V: {balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
4 G5 q4 ]' O; u: q; x' `& Rproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
# h. G* s5 v" b( d. o1 zrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
; r- Z1 f# k8 k1 X* zMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how+ D2 q6 ^% v) a
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be8 j7 z! {4 v9 x+ t9 D
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
5 s9 a- L. w: E& l% smemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".. D4 C* ~2 A9 c; T
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are6 a% m! S- i8 y* B& F$ U
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially2 Y4 Y% {, g$ c
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
# ~, s6 h* P4 X1 C8 p8 q( M% e1 `- \of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these- `/ `( s4 i2 }
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
# U+ ], V1 P" Y% _& ~; v8 Npeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
; C3 G- r. e) W! x8 P y6 Cmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
" K# u4 R! p; e( {of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before I0 }8 C0 @- T! @: q
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all- ]. ]; P. B1 k8 i! @+ A
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
- p; H1 m/ p! `( x' X' Vapartments are the way to go? No.6 ?, Z* v9 P3 ~& U; m
) x& E5 A" \& | h. F: P: ~3 U9 F
: m! c2 ]4 m7 |& Z4 \
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the! z" J7 z3 [1 v
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this* @4 b& F; p6 x. J: x0 Y
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make8 m8 I. \3 B( D, U2 x
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so4 v* e& ^. ~; z) R8 n/ ?8 i
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
6 z: l9 |" x( @6 [! r* @. P: hresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless, S; x. p6 N7 ^6 s" K
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is( ]2 f# z- W K4 K7 {& _, X
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|