服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6739|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 2 e- {' Y% m. @, |( h) J1 j& K- M) narchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider4 l/ U6 d& ?9 e% T( g8 S& C2 | Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ' t- O7 u' ]) v pcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.0 }8 B p8 s! C- w4 J3 E According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,: D( Y5 |$ N' u 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 6 y) Z/ ~$ A, i u I$ nManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within' o y! q! \0 j& h# D! B, w hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among, _/ n; T! `( t# S$ f each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera! e7 v2 Q) _7 _/ i4 V3 K% F and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is9 M& D/ Z9 g5 E harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 7 m' g& w I! F9 s: ?descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and h4 O; [6 x1 }3 m$ R5 wforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 1 z3 O+ ]% u0 P& owas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great / `, w' ?& I/ A0 M+ q) F2 W" ?impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,; Y# Q7 W! G3 Z7 { and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong/ S; u m$ X; s% g, Y has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 3 A# G' w4 a2 P3 H \7 `( B2 Qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 2 U: }2 Z# t0 t+ Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are / `3 W1 D/ g9 l* Y9 k; Monly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ! P; q2 |. |6 |7 Lsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government8 m8 |1 k3 u! u want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ! X( O9 h1 P4 N4 \6 Y0 qto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is / K7 z. _0 O7 J0 b$ Y( p5 {"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact," t) l3 u3 Y8 q: w6 q l! _ this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are / ^0 x7 x5 e2 `& l. c, Estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 3 v2 S( Y; O9 X. J6 V3 X5 N"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make* r1 D. n6 J# J: ^( { money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 6 M4 W7 Y, _" M3 h6 Oa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a . o, S& v; N/ O+ _parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across6 {, K" Q7 o9 J+ k' x* \ the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural( q( N( T+ W/ z* X3 p: W importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for , q: U* E' h, Z/ I5 r, f" {5 Z9 ?# o+ |development.

Hutongs * O$ z8 z: c6 B+ i% ~% {in the old days were residential area where people actually lived/ d1 A' W) e( _- |* Y5 f i there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions3 G; ~' q# g! v, t+ f9 X" _- G in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 8 c; x% \/ {+ T7 c+ t& D9 ]have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 2 t8 V0 ]5 z# l# x5 n* J( ^ p' E1 \will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. : z5 N# Y4 z- a% yFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date1 D, S$ _6 v/ m; _ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 6 ~- n9 g F; g' q# x3 ?6 H3 }. m: ?to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ( N _2 v* @4 ~3 ~0 q8 D9 Esupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically) z5 ?, {! a, r unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 9 h: n1 N9 @4 h3 l+ klive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,( g! a \7 }, o- T- Y8 J+ J$ p hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 7 p, `8 t7 l" @- a3 H2 Mbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the1 S, \; Y' V% ?3 T project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be. \6 i6 b/ x5 K renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ; M i$ o# e/ N wMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% N4 h1 H# V1 r0 r0 N N people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be; o$ ?( x9 v% Z9 `/ R. S j# A torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished! i8 B( a! A" x5 B9 A! P% B memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". : X( Z ?& ]$ Z# H5 \0 kNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are . o. C% x9 ]* R* G9 ] M3 Y1 ualigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 4 T; W0 B$ e2 k1 inon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image ) l4 S) w% K0 S, {. l: h3 hof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these" V+ b/ L' k; \% k0 P Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those* ?( Z2 k; ~/ x" q- _! ]; o+ V people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they9 ^$ j% C# c8 B" ^/ C" m may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ) Y- N% I3 {( E9 T# _5 M1 Jof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ( Y+ k; Z. P& q6 N: _! l3 y"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all $ a4 W1 w% z7 h0 }! L% Upeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ' e6 G3 l, _! Z3 H7 R2 f- ~' eapartments are the way to go? No.% O8 X: I& I/ I# ~/ ?$ R8 y 1 K6 p1 ^7 g$ a0 o : F Y: j8 I( p1 z- i1 ]2 n3 }. `

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 3 M5 t0 d# @7 M& j8 N" isituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( K- e/ ?! U$ d'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make & \3 b! T- `" I, c4 i8 M4 Eno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so+ `1 {6 F( i! ]6 z k fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 A( F: }- W7 I; U resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless , h ]5 m: R$ k, ?4 O7 s! lBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is" ` j) ]" C: ^$ @% x unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-15 13:24 , Processed in 0.117982 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部