服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6489|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its : S" b- m! X# E* Tarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider$ M. u! j; L8 b& B+ Z2 B' i, N+ O Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 0 i% |0 p6 b8 T! i7 @6 K" Ecity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ( i8 s5 \! m8 l0 I$ PAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,9 D# T, _0 c8 d. `8 p 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of) I" ~/ ]4 A" _9 }+ k Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within # Q: T) Y( ?4 F3 C. t* ~( Vhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among @6 e5 m0 T' ^ }0 i each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera- z S3 {+ f7 Y. K' @6 A and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 5 |: C* g# z/ Kharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are * A: X% ?# V3 l- N1 l/ Ddescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and * u/ m" g) Z7 j- t% S) gforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I! h' q' t: Z! Q- t, q was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great : l1 \* I; w& B+ M6 ?6 p, cimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, + X. c$ i9 S$ c2 V5 |and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 8 ]0 N+ [0 I" Jhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment : r$ X, V0 \$ R8 T, Lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that7 Z6 o: y. r; _4 _ no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are & @8 [- H( h3 z5 k' Jonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a: i9 J: n0 ~; b6 C* Q2 o% k sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ) M: G9 s( @$ twant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move) @' {7 k$ s6 i6 H to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is + G: t% g, _. f" x% A"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, * ]6 ?8 V- P( w6 l; Othis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are5 I' F) s; i1 Y% D still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to G/ O, w% g: a1 M8 ]1 N "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 6 a5 @, l" @- B. [money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was6 M- T: G& t, U( E$ k8 F5 _ a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 5 s6 k& ~9 I4 L4 y/ ~; h$ |5 eparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across+ i/ L) x( K4 S the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural " j4 i( r% n+ @& n. Cimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 {& F0 P- a+ H, U6 v development.

Hutongs* M3 h! \+ E6 B. o1 i3 L1 ] in the old days were residential area where people actually lived: \1 k6 o6 v1 S: m* @) R" z there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 2 o7 S: D$ h" h2 W1 }in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not V# M7 s1 s- s% E& P have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you7 \0 S3 p" E: S* `: {2 S0 `& W% F" _( g will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ) f3 @' k* i' y$ UFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 [2 G- L9 `# e% A to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used; ]# y/ O8 o! y) d3 V to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 9 V+ C/ G9 i. }) U0 ~- S+ Isupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 3 t& S" l4 U& runfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to; F+ H& s: O- i4 R: S% o5 }* H live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, & m# I" F5 |8 Ehutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 8 K4 x: D! T7 {balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the& l' x. B' D& I! ^! O$ L& j project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ( J+ r. g/ {0 w7 {renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 9 |/ O! K: L: gMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 3 {6 C! {1 Q0 d5 S2 apeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be0 J: ?0 U% {% {! A torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished/ e% C/ }( L4 D4 k% m memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".9 u) [$ {4 U* g Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ) {; d- @, i8 _5 b9 ]aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially $ O5 l9 T# Z% F# gnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image + J) R! H6 h. E* A- Jof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these + e' f4 x; l* h& o4 w( U5 a5 OHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ( C" v5 ]2 J, @4 `: @3 Ypeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they K2 c, |& Y' v4 j. ~; s5 Vmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some' P) a7 J4 ~( f N of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before2 j* s: b# L- }& D& S$ I+ e "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all1 p: v7 z/ J2 p! {" ^7 L! @ people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . w- [' S% q! t7 J n( p% `+ U2 K; z+ Fapartments are the way to go? No. K3 E4 j2 e: N3 d3 }( w7 A 9 }5 q" @ t# d3 m3 C 1 ?" J" d1 `% n

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the. ]1 |, f- I3 G. \* e" y1 u4 u1 o! B situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this) I, f: F7 x0 k: J K( B1 m! K 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make . }- j# J9 Y' P* h8 k& u. fno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so" b$ l" _- z8 s5 H( D fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 m3 x2 L( p6 i1 c resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ; R! n/ Z( Z( Q7 I9 y; E8 `Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is / G h1 u1 |$ J" b8 yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-17 23:37 , Processed in 0.118556 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部