服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6811|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its* K5 L2 y7 _ r6 R architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider* W2 s @3 p( Q" P' p; [ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 5 K) E4 @ R0 p. l6 N3 ?6 ecity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 6 a9 u, v( m7 R- u9 o7 [According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, % _. P+ p2 g; T- n+ s P8 _. l3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 2 x; v( Z! y" j0 a4 S: SManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 6 D. b6 G! {4 @2 s8 lhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among! |: X3 d0 x9 D8 x& v# h each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera$ i/ f8 }4 q6 j8 q0 N9 L4 f and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is % ]4 e1 X4 v6 x, C/ M3 N3 J0 U; Rharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ( U* @; w8 U$ p! ]+ tdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and% ?/ H: @% n5 _0 ] forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I7 s: C% h/ M1 b was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great # T* e$ ^; t X9 w" Rimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 2 Q9 Z G& x, a: sand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong: |/ |6 p2 f) U! A$ Z has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 0 i2 S) j9 o# K8 Vof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that $ ?9 ]: J* r, Y# `5 G/ V; {no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are + [3 r3 z6 d; R1 d' p- Monly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a # W% E2 q7 K# w1 ?4 tsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government( Z) a0 [2 V) c/ _! }$ ?) k want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- @- {: {4 Q5 [% G+ x to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is % ^1 l [4 H S% u) F/ |"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, + V8 k" `* D7 Z0 tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 1 `+ q4 [: C4 Y8 |still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to2 |$ i4 n3 T. ]% j2 @ "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 5 r/ @& ?- W+ Y; s/ kmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was1 p! l: [2 ~5 W a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 9 P; M8 z# O5 Sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across q3 B E- s" T& w) Ithe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 7 q F: E# d+ ]# K' `importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for. q" p6 a/ d, [! s development.

Hutongs4 [* v+ d1 d4 Y in the old days were residential area where people actually lived - [) w4 x4 h* w8 c* T4 W1 O7 w# v% hthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions6 @0 \9 B5 Z2 v& L, l in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not1 ?6 D. z/ \0 Q2 A& j have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you7 r0 P; c) S/ `/ c0 n/ } will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs., Z* h n/ }- t Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date2 i+ x& R# {& G9 ~1 V5 I1 T to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used3 ~0 \2 A% \$ ]* L; y0 b6 X$ S5 C to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses8 v% B9 Z0 @6 _ support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ) m4 }; G+ ^( t/ B; tunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to , z! c% K4 s9 _5 s) M9 V* Alive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, * j0 Z# z1 q) C, N# [! Nhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the7 y0 R' f8 ?' F4 I8 H2 ] balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the |* ^( j( F8 S0 t$ \project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be + v$ E, m( b0 q% Orenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ' y& n/ m- ^0 T; C. oMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ! R3 k5 {) H3 |. W# H+ [9 W4 Cpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be; N7 w$ B2 K* C' V6 f0 X+ i5 z9 a torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished% O6 ?0 E4 {# A* X memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 4 Z& Y: ^7 c& D. W' n7 ?9 xNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are5 c* }% m- L8 P! b Q% _2 h aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially / J' Q8 [9 f5 Z3 e# Y. P' wnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image* Y, t6 ~' q7 A/ M1 h of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these/ O/ z5 k, }6 D. w4 k* } Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those" T) ]; ]& T5 ] people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 1 O' p; `% h2 q: g% T0 B" Mmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some/ `4 P, e$ {, t- } of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 9 \5 B: L+ I* Q, ^3 Q- f"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all; V- _5 x" G; F5 B3 x, _ people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise$ A0 K0 ~% n* {( }# O apartments are the way to go? No.8 o7 ^% F5 u* R6 N, X. N F3 S8 [ i1 Z1 I) D0 ]" `4 T- v) C ! n1 K, T/ [( I, W' z

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the / x2 X5 t, n) \7 b5 ]% usituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this & @; w, p, i& Z2 y'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( b; K& x# L. M2 S, m2 f' ?7 s* W! j no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so( l. n! Q5 J( \1 M2 H e& B fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant" T# j6 |: v2 I resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 1 d+ E" \0 S* Q( P6 r& p6 U5 t& F) _Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 2 x6 ], A$ A% U3 M( l; Yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-24 03:12 , Processed in 0.126925 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部