服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6620|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its! X% r) b! H& q) h% [ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider/ s9 C: s- @, T+ p$ {% s. O Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 8 R8 `4 O( `! L# k# c* Mcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 3 s( [" g8 I" y8 r- mAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty," Z, M1 ]3 d: o6 n 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of - w5 B! M( ?7 L- h9 ~Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within @6 c. T- \( l4 i% L( @: n hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 2 P9 C3 m( j- u0 Y9 Deach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera, Y; M' s: M* S1 s% w and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 7 V D! q" y8 s5 b5 \: Hharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are1 o5 R' O3 [; g# T9 W descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and + j: a7 e4 t+ q( ^ e6 z1 _forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ; p( `; H' ?! O% E( G5 C$ Swas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 4 i8 w4 @2 \2 L- ?: m, dimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, & Q9 L# q. i' Q# e& a" h. \" x7 tand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 9 T2 [! }7 _3 {4 V X o5 Dhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment # W9 u! d5 X/ L3 U5 Pof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 9 S" T6 m W o9 J* h- T* Eno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are. H) C1 M3 h: ~+ }/ L; \) I only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a! V8 Y. f* J8 c2 t4 n4 _/ d sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 8 g& F9 S# F5 Y, P9 D9 C( L0 u! ywant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move( X) P; C/ _6 Z5 I5 x4 \2 e( B to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is % {" n8 F( ?/ N& G. ["modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, - F, d* Q. s4 u5 V1 E( s/ _$ zthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ! T. H. C6 q2 I( j3 f# m" Zstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ' O2 v5 ?0 Q" D1 ]"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make4 ?, O/ [! }1 o4 k% S money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was: j1 O9 Z4 P5 ? a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a% `4 u7 w2 `6 F' U3 O! G# t5 \ parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 1 o6 r6 q/ t: c. \the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural% z6 ?1 @9 Y8 @' m9 a importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 9 L' F( o' o4 w1 \* a1 F+ adevelopment.

Hutongs" P/ G! ]0 `3 ]* W1 k( } in the old days were residential area where people actually lived ! F" v& m# O+ V. l1 W" r0 Ythere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions0 O. v2 f) ]$ l/ R; d3 V in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ' B' ~: J, g( Y: H: g& @have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you! P5 T6 b3 H+ E* k will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.( P7 H( c2 {! t* h4 H9 l3 X4 O Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 2 I f) K3 f7 ~to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used# [5 T7 @( _1 e, l- W% H# V4 c2 x1 x# F! w to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses# ~3 u+ U% @; v" F2 K8 K& j support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ) J+ u5 j3 \+ U. qunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to " U: I8 u2 S, s$ ]# h( C. B, y- W9 l. Wlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,# b& f6 u# J( _. j/ t) I) Y- p- Y# w hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the; f; T4 e! |6 S1 S# v# w4 j balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ; J" I; y: O+ f( u6 Zproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be; Y, X$ h: k1 w& K- { `6 | renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong , O! ]$ ~3 D% g1 kMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 1 v+ V8 o2 d# Ppeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be. [3 L- ^) u# S1 ? torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished/ e' }* q# G) O% T5 [ memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".( I( Q7 b2 z% J# [5 G/ i Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are7 Q) A! n" }. w( S8 s5 b7 k aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 5 @6 f o8 m, `, K# f: X& knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 3 ^# f3 x: y- Y' Nof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these5 A! k- \3 j$ P Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 1 C! K9 Q4 t( i e N' npeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they . _- d6 r& f9 v, ~! Y5 x- k! b# Umay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some, Z5 g/ H3 H6 X- B. _9 B of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before % p+ Q0 Z3 l2 h0 Y& q- ?* W"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 4 Y% |# L2 G2 ppeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise + `: V$ T0 L4 P g8 Vapartments are the way to go? No. 3 x5 P0 U* n# L. N 2 \% V- p5 M7 Y% B% J- j5 \ U % c, q: g/ W5 {: e2 [% t l

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the % s2 X; {/ ]! ~8 _! x" n1 s' `situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this) y7 ^2 _8 i9 C" m# E: Z 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 1 W( j) q5 [: @6 e1 q8 kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 4 k9 D( A$ O( J. O6 Jfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 W. L8 @* u% J* d' A+ R" g5 G% D resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless - H u9 p- x' r0 p* H# d' aBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is0 E+ M9 ~! F) l, ]* w" o' i unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-1 15:46 , Processed in 0.126255 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部