UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its) J0 V) Q9 Q9 j. R* }
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
4 I7 c5 A& o# l& o" bBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
$ `9 f$ V3 n" D' Icity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.! D4 p% T2 q' ] s
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
% V2 q+ Q. Z1 l1 @* r# S$ W3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of! ~8 \& O, `. i7 q
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within% V5 o$ ~/ Z- Q0 V- T, E
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among- z$ Y; n8 f7 J
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera/ A3 M/ P3 n' K4 y, ^
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
2 i: ]% x6 S1 _7 ?harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are1 A) Q9 W) f! P/ k1 d
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, ^; W: J7 e# C4 v4 b- U
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I7 d& Z% T& b% l! }/ d5 b
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
9 x/ o1 L! o6 w l$ yimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
' A! e. i$ _8 a1 sand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong" s3 \' Z: R; _
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
: ^+ X" k- K/ x( c+ D0 A+ oof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
1 z8 T% j4 Z7 Fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
C' B2 G7 e0 ? [3 ronly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
+ \- G+ `( p3 q, P- b( qsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government2 C% M+ z8 a3 W7 O. |0 G% q- Z
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
( m4 S8 h) e( j' c6 q* pto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is* X1 i- N! m1 k- R) J: V) D7 g
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
! A: Q" V7 \5 N. nthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are; O) w( ~& P/ r- i7 x
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to& v( _9 N- t$ d" i( a1 _ D
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make# I* u9 i9 |9 @ ^. ^, A2 x
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
1 R4 v" d) i7 |" I5 R. p& J- ea beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
2 V2 Z3 ?' y8 ?# m% Nparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
+ }( g/ G% s+ F n" kthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural' P/ S! E; E4 W. D! X
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
, q2 k z9 l2 x$ s% r( H8 [development.
Hutongs
. k. H, v! {4 J5 F& z9 Q8 Min the old days were residential area where people actually lived
& F, @+ J$ m3 I% W7 f7 T5 \there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
" Z$ c% A( [3 f# kin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
* L; a+ v+ z$ q5 j) J' khave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you D/ Q6 n6 X9 o
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.; t7 `& r0 w: r+ n; B
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date, U2 P4 t, {0 ]: X
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
0 ~ d2 [' s! P; R/ pto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses% E6 s1 I" N- W& [. a% y0 o: |# I
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically& W/ S! d% Q# z2 e& m
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 S" \2 b" U3 {3 `6 X' O* {
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,% x% j! g' Q3 W6 m; L" ]* p& E
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the0 S# T' g, }6 P
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the8 x; w4 M$ V% W* @
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
( U& Y$ R; E/ C$ krenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
4 y8 @; R7 I4 ~+ u9 C) ~& w$ E! wMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how- g- e. [. ]3 f6 E
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be l* P4 `" p# q2 e5 D# C
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
, a% A8 z" T* v) e" Z( xmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
- E, X, c* ?( e- v* FNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are' p0 Z( B" |) o+ K! ?$ q% ^
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
: e. J9 R. {+ Jnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image: o5 B( k2 { [2 z, E6 N) z
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these1 @+ Q: ^: `; P7 k' F
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those, c- A: E2 U6 m
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they1 Y4 @% U, p4 x; F. E
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some/ Z/ l' i4 r9 Y
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before; N- H5 k3 v5 b
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
- S: F! v" a7 w% _6 z) }+ M% ipeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
2 E. O3 S) x* R2 j9 q8 Mapartments are the way to go? No./ N" @* }, _9 E+ F& A0 R
2 Z5 Y# a4 J/ m' M9 [9 s 8 U+ a0 e# {5 ^. h2 n9 ?
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the* I- |' f+ ~8 [ I9 s7 z' R4 g
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
- l, l# F' x+ w8 D8 J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make& ~+ I: k2 T- A7 K/ {# q% c+ n
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so" ~& X6 ]- Y6 c. \! _- n: e
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant. F' m. K1 N3 W9 _/ K- V2 ^/ I8 M$ q
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless: G# k7 X% X( D0 ?
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is* ~& t: u) V) q3 I' k# z7 b6 X
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|