服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6762|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its! P7 W0 A; g8 {# W" s" ~" @ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider c; @: ^7 H9 |1 m8 c6 J" }- E: M. Q Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"8 F# b- P$ M7 W( l6 ^ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.. W; K2 ?; r/ r( g According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, . H% Y1 ]8 z/ D' E$ }3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 7 ?& c% b9 F/ |6 qManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within5 y. J) f# N, @9 [7 O7 h6 l hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among % d4 A, Z+ \/ y, C, F7 _each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 0 \2 x: k4 H- R% oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ( G- |% c& X; _- F( rharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are J' l+ G2 c6 {1 Ldescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and + s* [2 z9 c( u. a, C, W2 r8 R& Kforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I # b3 r& v* P. a/ X! t0 U6 A0 p, ^was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great; T. d O1 L8 _# y impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ) o7 [ w8 r! _* w- Nand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 9 @' E" z; N; I2 E4 v4 chas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment $ M S4 v# A7 A( H& Qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that2 `+ t3 R) Y% p3 ` no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are3 D6 c# v; Z, x- c' t5 l0 ]: I only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a $ ~$ e7 G2 Z7 Esort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government! B# y" K% q$ v% h B want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# m3 z# D# J+ ?; M$ v to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is) c, t. _1 v' D# L: j "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 5 c) E7 t/ H: ]3 L/ [this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are2 c5 Z! K: N) [5 ?% W still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to : D: ~" r N/ W3 M/ w' X"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make6 h: v# d5 v$ l money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. y% u8 ], [. ^% v a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ) ^ @4 J. s- T) G1 f q, Gparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 0 B" a' x6 T; k+ ]the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural/ ]9 C4 ^8 \2 |; `5 y( S* q( K importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for% K6 m# S3 B _% Y1 l% b development.

Hutongs) z6 L3 U* t# u. |0 t in the old days were residential area where people actually lived ! l' ]; T- w9 w) X( t$ rthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions % n) p M* A# i" P$ a% I: ], Q% fin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not. _4 C& j9 {" [4 X. s; C& { have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you " ~( W; A6 T$ ]8 ?2 u: ^( R6 gwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 0 J: b. o7 y- P3 KFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ' b5 v- Z. Q. L' @to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used % a5 K, o( ^9 `' x$ O1 Kto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses" \4 s9 G' J2 n. z7 t support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically7 l1 ^8 a4 O6 ] J" e# g, O* o0 | unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to9 e( s- n \3 p6 L+ s/ [6 T live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, % F3 P6 X5 q: V4 thutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the, ?# c' j0 l( y, Z5 K balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the0 y8 Y! }0 r+ {, P# B/ M project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be, q# W c, c' v renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong , _- k: g8 u& `- DMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how & i& D/ w9 E% h! D; s6 K( D# S% upeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 0 b8 @, [. \8 X" A) Q; Utorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished* M3 t8 i/ E# j9 F, G8 W% t! d memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".) @+ ?/ C9 T% O0 R0 b: P. w9 |0 N. F Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ) Y& H* m; Y2 Maligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 7 N5 z J1 @" S. a( Z) anon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image : W) N) a1 i2 e- `$ ]# z+ gof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these U( @# n7 V* R0 CHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 P) p% V' W$ T8 R people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they0 y+ n6 W# n0 W% K may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some8 s6 v9 ~: ^# U: U8 l: G of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before * E6 [) Z0 a6 R# c2 @6 [4 u"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all " p) \% V' n& m5 H; C) E1 L# qpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise; b7 ~, y6 ?+ Q% U apartments are the way to go? No. Q" d. j% r w8 n. h. m ( v$ I; U% v5 {$ e& Q# b5 K0 k * g! s7 r5 A b6 P" r3 k

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 3 Z/ v/ i5 `# v+ g; nsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& U2 f8 b4 [; E/ ~ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ( S' s: T4 P8 cno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so, x1 n3 a& s! c: w) n fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant - }1 i1 p) c9 W# D d: hresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless , S- D/ z# [8 G* S4 a/ w4 T+ iBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- F& b: h9 O- ?9 d9 u unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-17 16:15 , Processed in 0.115829 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部