UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
; d1 j- ?9 _: _+ u' G0 Earchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider- N' L ~0 X7 F- U& g
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"" U% ]. z- P7 a6 Y5 Y
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
. r) j. {5 b* K: TAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
8 i- I$ F0 X$ q# l$ [3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of+ d% O* B7 r( O* n; o
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
0 f v- ~9 p/ V9 s) [4 j8 |hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among& T% h( J7 _# }9 i- S8 |& o. m" }! p
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera% s7 J8 {" m$ o
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
6 W0 v& \8 m. `/ e7 x4 sharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are% b& h" x9 ?5 a
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and) c7 j6 D0 O. j5 X" ?1 c$ `
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
" v- ~$ k7 ~7 L8 q1 k& p# Uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great2 B2 z( i: x7 e7 J. F4 {8 z$ k
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
( S- B6 E+ c4 C& r4 Y- n! d. P, Land we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong7 Z/ Z i$ T% l) ~& H
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
% l! O9 t& ~2 r9 Zof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that2 [' K3 ~9 b! }4 U) P& B
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are5 o( ~ J. K4 w1 U2 F
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
1 d H+ O& h, H. u- W4 D4 C& Isort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government* [2 d( Z9 ~$ Q1 A7 [
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move2 B' z0 k' c$ J( s; T' Y+ o
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
' C1 Y) v6 _) y* i% D7 m' S3 p"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
8 B" O8 Z: K8 ]. _' C! Athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are5 j* S; H8 O/ H9 m& m7 F+ l
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
- d) a: D3 d$ _5 c- |" R( Y"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
5 F# @9 L* W' @/ n9 G5 Umoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was4 a4 ]2 c9 b9 [6 D/ _
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
8 p& A( v q* ]0 jparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
, x+ I& x- b( B- H. sthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural7 ~7 A' [2 l& D0 ]
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for& E2 k; E* @3 W" U0 O F
development.
Hutongs
. S' E9 e* g2 @/ ?# q' D, c4 jin the old days were residential area where people actually lived, w2 R, p7 i2 }. x2 Y# L w1 p
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
# N7 f; i: c5 S' q- E$ R1 F; cin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not' d4 g3 r8 j( x- n: z1 i2 H
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you" ]6 Q) u1 L" L( J/ h$ b7 i
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
3 e/ R, U# a! {Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
7 j$ N, P! R7 m' _9 Dto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used9 s1 C! [2 O' t) I; { ]
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses/ @ C# W; O# w
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
" }* `4 h A5 D3 {7 h+ K2 k5 l4 nunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to; K% u/ |5 B: d9 y" y
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,/ j! ^" d5 R' O r5 e- C
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
' _- S H0 Z* G9 l7 o& i0 Dbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; X- t: z5 b( D& y# S
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
' s5 j+ J# |: R- ^3 Nrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
: z2 Z9 c6 e! p; k' s; ZMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how# m, x* J. g- m; d/ F
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 s4 n5 _* q% P% H
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished% o. c& L* P; d0 `
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
1 R$ e! `: B6 r/ I0 B1 cNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
$ F5 \7 S: u5 |aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially# ]& z1 i! R/ \8 l
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
$ M! P% d+ M1 E; b' Bof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these" R/ {- u/ Q' P! `6 s: Z6 P
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
+ Y: ]! s7 A5 u' Ypeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
& e9 Y4 |' h; b4 s; Tmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
+ O7 E g! ?; i+ ^of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
" N# @- B! \5 \& y"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all8 ~6 |' j- s9 V8 R$ {8 ]" D
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise6 a% y& W; F; ^: v5 i9 e- ]. Y
apartments are the way to go? No.
$ `% `5 M+ t5 @/ `5 r6 K 1 J- ^( _7 p0 A. n6 p
; E; O9 Y3 f" c) ]/ j* I
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the4 e( V4 R& J2 s& W
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
" {# f/ T w5 ~' Y'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
3 d8 R- A7 `' C- _' eno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
9 c$ ^' c0 S# i4 F% [* Ofast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, P7 ^+ X7 X* P' U* h
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
- Q% u- K+ z1 [2 o2 y# |. ]Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
9 Q. `" R7 K" L& ^5 D- _( Gunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|