UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its/ y/ y& b& i! u) [8 v! k1 F
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider& e/ `- h' m1 G, ]) _8 w
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"4 V2 i# h" r6 e6 v% ?) t
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
5 R! c" Q! h5 TAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
8 t; F4 R1 _$ B1 k- I! T7 Q3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
3 ^/ P& q$ _1 C4 | W$ J( YManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
! f6 z7 Y( u2 k# D- \8 [6 z$ k7 Khutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
0 B& G# a2 e, b: z4 V+ Yeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera( {( J# M2 \7 P( G+ V' E* u
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is1 n) Q, I+ f+ ~. ~) B, y& c
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 e( K1 n; L$ S1 C# ~7 {: ]
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
3 N s) v4 E9 k4 [forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
( ^8 }, {/ L( d2 c5 w& Wwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great8 n% E2 D; z/ J; z4 o
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
, B4 J! r5 O3 R# S1 ]' W8 Vand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- x2 q$ m; e+ m- c, o* e+ B
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
/ K' S* b9 x. p S6 l4 P; w' fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that1 n& n1 u: _# j( v
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
" ~- X% }9 s- s; U- Qonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a3 v' }; @4 }: e; @5 `
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government0 s* c4 G( U: E/ U- [7 S: ~. t
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move/ F9 j& G( P0 k+ Q! I) C+ J
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
. ^5 b# {4 \: ~, E: L8 u6 A" ^! G"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
9 W: a" q- m+ _this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are6 s7 n! E# B$ ~/ m; a
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to- c U. j; {: p$ I6 P$ Q
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& r# h3 ?" D$ O5 T! X
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was- K6 N- K; I X* B0 a8 m7 X
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
+ n# g; V" R9 t) ~9 Rparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across, T8 e0 j f8 D2 S$ b
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
+ [7 j ?4 ~3 [( Z& F9 uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for4 ?: @, E! Q; \) [ z
development.
Hutongs9 Z! [' l" E, U7 E' }' O+ F& ]* s# z+ v
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
B4 c! m. E- j5 T' Pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
: }) O/ E" F9 G& [in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( J( a5 S2 Y" }5 Y; X: [9 F9 x8 s
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
. H* I5 c- o' a( r+ l& i7 w+ e% \6 ^will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
/ s+ t( ^" K# f/ h: t: q6 ^6 oFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
' s% B' h% {+ sto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used# I) d& \# {* m& W$ b7 E
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
( X& d# D% K% U Tsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
9 `6 N- h8 r2 M" W: U4 Munfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to, C$ k. W3 |2 B8 y5 Q0 d& r% t
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,! t% [" u! L- n2 J. n
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the8 s8 h/ w1 D+ @, l; G" [( H
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the7 d" t3 a, t) b3 B0 V! c
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be6 B. _) {# J* A% K9 A) ` w5 o
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong" [& _. d- }( W+ a3 m) o
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
6 }! y4 I# F( |+ _0 ]! [people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
1 M# O! W8 d2 I `+ D: o0 ^torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished( ?' s7 A5 I/ M8 C' k0 I# c0 Y
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
, |+ H. q- D$ _' l! p- ^Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
- i; N X$ x: y% t" Aaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
& ~9 @3 q! }6 \' w' enon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
+ U* h& e, [1 ? A( Pof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these C; _7 W% p" R6 |
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
8 N. ?+ Z6 P- Z' A) x: u- k) W& }people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
8 o; p; N" E! ]0 ]( O- {0 Fmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" p" F$ v* o( i* g
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
' U3 K. z4 O" s"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all/ r3 [/ N3 [9 w# K Q' h
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- ]" g" u, r( U
apartments are the way to go? No.1 W4 N4 Q* U4 X$ S4 `
/ N% T0 s3 X! a1 G
" N+ H7 O1 z9 \& `$ Q
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the- Q$ S1 p8 _/ o9 j
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
8 M0 ]$ Q3 C/ P1 i! f& V'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
0 F- _' J, q8 g, R* Ano money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
( z; `! I1 B, }' r9 p9 wfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant# `& K- H" }: v$ O3 |- B2 S: F' D
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
) V/ U3 K& g! y3 m l4 i1 M6 c6 ~2 DBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is7 K, r9 {+ `4 [0 ?6 `, t
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|