服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6248|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 4 F5 |3 p/ ]- I5 rarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ; i5 ]5 [' {" [" xBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"* l7 Z7 W. J2 ^, N9 N4 t! e2 o city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.5 P6 n7 b# ^+ W3 C6 W+ V$ T; ] According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,: s M! v& J1 e; x- M; ~- F 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of . c0 I7 q: g+ s! ?9 GManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 5 W% s2 e: v$ r9 chutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among" Y6 |+ l# @- |3 L2 r/ P% t: n each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera, H7 X2 ?! M) X& o; q+ U7 [8 G& D and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is8 u/ f" F; G; K2 t1 M' I harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are- m! o9 B: r3 I% N( k descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and+ y0 R+ [' b" y! h2 X3 e$ ? forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ; _/ @& Q9 O1 Uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 4 _2 y1 ?* v( w) M% }impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 9 ^1 m) M Y2 T- ^' v! B3 Q, I8 [and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong + o _6 \, d+ ?& S' ^has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment . x' O2 G/ X# t* \2 {- Lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that % ]) a9 ~. ?6 {' H- Nno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 9 |% M9 F9 |5 C* bonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a4 w* M$ a8 F1 }- d- ?" y, | sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 3 D# L+ c1 [5 b; M2 M( v7 @7 q8 dwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move2 {7 q) a3 k- @0 o9 Z to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is' Y+ M, N! v; @: i "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ( C- ~% x6 V3 b# y( tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 0 l9 ?7 l' P3 ~5 A3 h8 I2 estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to2 v( w9 q' H8 y1 s "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ^% i5 {; n5 ^- N money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was - n+ j6 ?0 \7 ?8 u9 D, Ra beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a3 i4 r7 c$ Q( [) o! S: N parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across * k9 ?" Z/ A9 c dthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ( Q3 c7 ?+ z# simportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for1 O6 q+ c) t$ ~" N development.

Hutongs " E( B0 r- ]/ _7 i0 i3 B. Sin the old days were residential area where people actually lived' H: H2 E' H& Y3 [ K1 s9 { there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 0 H4 _" u1 \, b- {! v9 min hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not8 u) O5 p$ z, D$ k y6 i- G# M have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you % O4 `6 M* K+ L8 W4 rwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. " h" }7 t$ z( I' C/ I2 ~Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date : ]# \' M% \" H. j7 Z. I8 vto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 1 b, p% G0 M- S9 J: C Fto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ @- l; l8 C0 i% Z support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ' ~& [6 P$ V: C# K$ Funfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ( v% ^, s+ x8 m7 W( ilive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: p( P0 ^8 Z b$ N hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the1 f4 [# u! O: m P$ @ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 4 ^! \* W1 y3 dproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 5 P* l. W$ s7 i5 irenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong) h4 p/ d* U$ @1 ^$ a/ h- u Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how & k7 }, f, C- V( n6 M/ \' kpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be, ~3 E! M+ N9 C g+ _$ t torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished * D% r' s i7 I# i% Wmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". . I4 I8 E$ X; ^ T% DNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are + g# ~% A+ [, G# ~aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially $ Q- T+ d" X* K% s5 dnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image/ J* O+ P7 q l! u. W: o1 \! _6 _5 E' @ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these1 b+ S( T; Z, E( S) y9 z/ j! R Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 8 L+ K& [5 F h8 e/ A8 b" [+ ^people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they' y8 w6 K. v9 v1 | may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some( E1 S. {( ?1 Z% f+ W of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before - n2 G: P0 `0 S8 k4 i# t"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all6 X! k. u4 Z8 ?& r( R people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise : L2 z/ d4 s' }apartments are the way to go? No.( s" b+ m9 h$ l0 w, U & W! J' K2 a/ w3 Q( X! n 4 [2 a- B7 O7 V9 o1 A8 V

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the; H& ^5 }- _7 Q$ V2 D w$ A situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this" J# R; J* m5 U+ S 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 5 W% Q! W) K* u( m7 B u9 bno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so6 ^) h7 i" T$ M$ J7 k/ z' z fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ' \. {* u# n cresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless- v- x, Z7 H8 N- V8 O Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is, i; N5 s# f5 r. S) ] unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-2 02:43 , Processed in 0.143211 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部