服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6442|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its / _' v! I# |; |8 d) Rarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider8 Y8 M9 y7 I! b- ^ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"$ U+ W) A, _1 I) w+ w5 @ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. B5 i3 u! A+ G B$ _* Y9 ` According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,& j- @1 w! x# s4 K* V+ S 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 4 _% E2 j+ N; d* K$ j( SManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within5 f4 Z/ G( V _6 _% }# W hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 0 y# o! d, C5 ^" aeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera $ S" T% F' I' u, U) mand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 5 U: ^1 N4 ^8 Q) yharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 9 A1 |3 Q) T; B7 I: j6 Pdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and . `) q" R. D6 o, V" ]9 X+ tforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I % |$ n; _$ B' L4 fwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 7 @* u" r( k+ g" |impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, - q& I/ p2 G- L2 P! @& @: J1 Yand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 3 [( [+ _0 L. K$ c3 I5 Ehas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment0 T1 t1 X, \/ e9 A4 \; Q2 K: h1 M of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that - J: L- v+ e1 O2 l# b; }& ~; d# Zno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 9 c2 t; _) u' r" n+ `2 ^/ E. d& |only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ' T7 N$ u4 G# W8 s8 usort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 7 R( @! i* e, Q+ R0 ^- ?want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move" l& V9 R; k% N! n, L3 J to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is F* D% I' _( D0 E3 N# V"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, % [* c% \; k, w# E9 h, b2 Fthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ) g; ~6 \" t5 X) k, c% D `still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 5 X& u# C( i9 d) j0 X/ P# D"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 6 O8 u( e3 G/ F* e# N5 R9 \money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was $ e2 M6 U4 g/ V4 J' K* Ha beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a # r! k( t) u) d/ I, U) u+ Iparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across) U9 o; I* o# q7 K9 o the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 7 p _" c' O; nimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for: d$ I' e8 h3 k development.

Hutongs 0 C$ P+ C/ \* c) Q7 R; \0 |& k4 {in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 4 C0 O# t$ {9 J0 {there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions % I& \: f; P- b+ k' u7 d Pin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not& W/ @: q, S6 j7 O2 H0 k( J have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ! T. G# b" Z& m1 X# m* ^will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 3 g" k. x* ]5 e' E6 W0 fFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date( o J; m9 H) u5 @9 G. N @ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 b# j0 Y- ~ o6 E, i to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 3 X3 _1 L0 C4 x6 ?& Z4 q& {support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically) d3 h3 w4 _" y unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to & [9 L; P+ _. Q- U$ \live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,8 N* N' {; J+ X$ x( f j# r3 d hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the6 |5 f2 S5 h6 s& V" _' }# J- p& w/ q1 l& P balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the0 `( e, E1 k# `5 T9 w project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be % w; i1 Q/ j4 \' {$ i srenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong( S5 D/ ~' k: D2 @) U% O: w0 \4 N Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how " B0 O m1 e3 apeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be" ~, M; t/ F+ ?3 [' y( H torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 0 t/ z8 g+ l+ ?memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ' _' b' T* f5 ^ J# N; H+ `' |: c$ }Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are( _8 u |1 Y9 |. v' x aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially" U6 H; @: a) m! A non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image( D5 @0 A% {* u( F! H7 Z; o2 ^# |9 K of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ! n. i& f. t% ^! I5 W) BHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 1 K- C' w* p# l3 [6 Mpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they) J. {; J7 _, m may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some # w1 G# M1 F+ q; p. Nof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 9 R+ q d) Q1 p"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all l6 A9 p# c, Y2 j people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 g. D/ g' o7 y o apartments are the way to go? No. $ Q* u( m: T$ a3 _' p- j + j* g3 ^+ N* D7 r: A 4 W/ g" e4 w* m% L2 g% m

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the . i. _/ F0 s, p( Q9 P! r1 ^' gsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ; ~; q& A2 a9 i$ X! u. f/ z" i'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make# J5 ]9 E$ w- o E7 Q no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so$ X5 w% Y: \+ [ fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant + U: T9 \, M* q, `" B# m8 yresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ; W( H) k' K! C9 c: ^4 G: w+ a! \! }Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ' v4 q! F: y G( q* T' w' \0 i4 Uunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-14 18:31 , Processed in 0.117317 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部