服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6337|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its C7 b; H+ t7 }( n% w% yarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 1 _5 s. b6 z# Z' _/ v: b; ]6 z( gBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" . T4 B2 c8 R$ U8 }+ x8 V% V9 {city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 9 g1 p$ Y( e W& MAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,/ U/ _; `' i0 L0 y+ x" f 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of6 H! G1 {7 R/ T& l5 r Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within1 R$ \; ?, E# O hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among$ K) v$ |7 Q2 J' D each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera& S/ a9 d$ }( U$ f! {: ^2 M and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is & H) Y( W( A3 O/ q5 Bharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 9 O2 ?% \3 i V5 I. d7 edescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, K& B) j1 U: U4 u5 Z/ A forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I( h) c5 c1 h* H) \+ P* x3 S; ] was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ) H! k' C! D, d# Z7 t5 n( R; i' g2 Bimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 5 I2 j/ O/ F$ `5 y% R' V% g6 Oand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong+ r8 f2 \$ l; N has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment0 W5 X2 g. j0 y2 \ C( p of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ! E+ l( d% Q$ c% S# Lno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are! L) C }# s+ N2 j' E only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a o4 W9 \& d( ]) f' vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government " c. c9 m5 x& d! x4 V% rwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 3 B9 O- I% E. J! oto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is+ Y" [. D/ {$ q6 O. {1 M "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 6 r' l- q$ J6 bthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 0 l5 c+ I: f* |. X2 x$ e/ t( Hstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to % q+ G$ ]# p4 K U2 I"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ Z4 O% T( e' w1 A) I( c, [ money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 8 Z! n: j( J2 t$ R& z1 ~ D5 aa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 8 q7 ]" b( I# V% hparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across % C+ W& n1 Y8 E6 Othe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural $ B0 N* a& W M2 [4 x! \3 N' |4 {importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for& [$ R' L6 q4 P+ X+ h development.

Hutongs 3 B+ W8 J& r+ @* P- v) hin the old days were residential area where people actually lived & Y, G( q0 C1 X0 p" Qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions : I. N7 D8 c, p' D/ j" ]3 Kin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 0 C2 X L* P( U3 { }2 K" u" ]. m& Mhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you H9 f1 P+ t; qwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.. p) C( a- K/ Z" ^ Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 4 _2 M7 M: X) X1 ^$ @to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used * n5 x4 _7 C3 B+ f; U; yto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 6 ^ W% C0 R: F" Usupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 3 D9 Q8 H7 |9 Q; x1 r2 ]# tunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ; M! R- l) k9 j8 _5 E/ vlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,! e5 ^2 l1 X% _$ r6 {* ] hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the+ T) M$ v/ |# ^; H6 F; O balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 1 G) {3 X1 R7 R1 ^8 uproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be3 U+ k& t4 o r$ I renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong & a2 _7 Q* H' D; T8 F% d9 j) A& C5 lMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how& S) ~1 T1 w; n5 c/ F' u3 q people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ( G2 y6 P* J* l7 }' F5 P/ \torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished / U- e7 J- f z* R, tmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 1 h8 r. m( S; W7 C, P lNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are8 F2 M4 A/ g0 Q" Z% o7 M# h aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially; T. [6 o% _( E( P" B4 E non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 2 z, Q% ~. k8 l6 u0 ~( p( Dof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 6 z& n/ j b7 Z( {+ }Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those : E: m9 a& m& q4 ] `: Xpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they9 k. @* K) @1 O8 I1 R/ M may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 4 j+ H, F4 b' P X+ P! pof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ( }; d" K" p$ M5 ~) D"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all , I) g6 P% A' J& L" K- lpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 6 v$ d- p+ N+ ^; _3 aapartments are the way to go? No. 1 M) O8 y0 z, c & A) q7 T. r, M4 C2 G% X ( w, ?/ f' O- C% x4 ~% O4 G

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the( E. l' P, o7 g" n situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this4 T8 q5 }& j: c8 h! d 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make6 |3 _5 ?+ O4 D4 B" H no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so " h/ K- z' g% M" @7 ^fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 1 V6 T3 B' `! J: Cresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ) }5 q, K( V8 K& ~9 H5 HBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is0 a0 O2 q( j: `; z' j unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-29 23:17 , Processed in 0.140211 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部