服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6652|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its/ y/ y& b& i! u) [8 v! k1 F architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider& e/ `- h' m1 G, ]) _8 w Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"4 V2 i# h" r6 e6 v% ?) t city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 5 R! c" Q! h5 TAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 8 t; F4 R1 _$ B1 k- I! T7 Q3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 3 ^/ P& q$ _1 C4 | W$ J( YManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ! f6 z7 Y( u2 k# D- \8 [6 z$ k7 Khutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 0 B& G# a2 e, b: z4 V+ Yeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera( {( J# M2 \7 P( G+ V' E* u and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is1 n) Q, I+ f+ ~. ~) B, y& c harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 e( K1 n; L$ S1 C# ~7 {: ] descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 3 N s) v4 E9 k4 [forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ( ^8 }, {/ L( d2 c5 w& Wwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great8 n% E2 D; z/ J; z4 o impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, , B4 J! r5 O3 R# S1 ]' W8 Vand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- x2 q$ m; e+ m- c, o* e+ B has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment / K' S* b9 x. p S6 l4 P; w' fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that1 n& n1 u: _# j( v no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are " ~- X% }9 s- s; U- Qonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a3 v' }; @4 }: e; @5 ` sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government0 s* c4 G( U: E/ U- [7 S: ~. t want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move/ F9 j& G( P0 k+ Q! I) C+ J to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is . ^5 b# {4 \: ~, E: L8 u6 A" ^! G"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 9 W: a" q- m+ _this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are6 s7 n! E# B$ ~/ m; a still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to- c U. j; {: p$ I6 P$ Q "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& r# h3 ?" D$ O5 T! X money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was- K6 N- K; I X* B0 a8 m7 X a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a + n# g; V" R9 t) ~9 Rparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across, T8 e0 j f8 D2 S$ b the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural + [7 j ?4 ~3 [( Z& F9 uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for4 ?: @, E! Q; \) [ z development.

Hutongs9 Z! [' l" E, U7 E' }' O+ F& ]* s# z+ v in the old days were residential area where people actually lived B4 c! m. E- j5 T' Pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions : }) O/ E" F9 G& [in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( J( a5 S2 Y" }5 Y; X: [9 F9 x8 s have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you . H* I5 c- o' a( r+ l& i7 w+ e% \6 ^will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. / s+ t( ^" K# f/ h: t: q6 ^6 oFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ' s% B' h% {+ sto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used# I) d& \# {* m& W$ b7 E to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ( X& d# D% K% U Tsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 9 `6 N- h8 r2 M" W: U4 Munfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to, C$ k. W3 |2 B8 y5 Q0 d& r% t live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,! t% [" u! L- n2 J. n hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the8 s8 h/ w1 D+ @, l; G" [( H balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the7 d" t3 a, t) b3 B0 V! c project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be6 B. _) {# J* A% K9 A) ` w5 o renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong" [& _. d- }( W+ a3 m) o Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 6 }! y4 I# F( |+ _0 ]! [people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 1 M# O! W8 d2 I `+ D: o0 ^torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished( ?' s7 A5 I/ M8 C' k0 I# c0 Y memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". , |+ H. q- D$ _' l! p- ^Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are - i; N X$ x: y% t" Aaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially & ~9 @3 q! }6 \' w' enon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image + U* h& e, [1 ? A( Pof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these C; _7 W% p" R6 | Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 8 N. ?+ Z6 P- Z' A) x: u- k) W& }people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 8 o; p; N" E! ]0 ]( O- {0 Fmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" p" F$ v* o( i* g of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ' U3 K. z4 O" s"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all/ r3 [/ N3 [9 w# K Q' h people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- ]" g" u, r( U apartments are the way to go? No.1 W4 N4 Q* U4 X$ S4 ` / N% T0 s3 X! a1 G " N+ H7 O1 z9 \& `$ Q

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the- Q$ S1 p8 _/ o9 j situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 8 M0 ]$ Q3 C/ P1 i! f& V'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 0 F- _' J, q8 g, R* Ano money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ( z; `! I1 B, }' r9 p9 wfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant# `& K- H" }: v$ O3 |- B2 S: F' D resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ) V/ U3 K& g! y3 m l4 i1 M6 c6 ~2 DBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is7 K, r9 {+ `4 [0 ?6 `, t unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-5 21:01 , Processed in 0.131133 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部