UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
. }# |' k# `6 @% K7 X' v% @" sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
1 i# r7 P1 M; \Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"4 w, `! y( D# p* E0 ^
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
7 M2 o( a0 k1 ?5 S# x3 q1 W$ h' hAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,' `% O9 \# N6 d5 ~
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of: @: b- m5 U ?8 y7 {+ A5 y
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
) D# w; ?7 i1 V" E0 phutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
: i( y4 t& H% g, ]each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 p) w0 e7 B+ ~9 R5 G( s8 D( W
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is6 B) z7 x6 z; ?- {5 u9 Q$ q
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
q# \$ p& p/ b: ~3 {descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
4 g% L! i; c m3 o0 E: x/ Nforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
; N1 _3 c: W/ t. iwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great: B% V; b% S" m0 A: t
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,/ g( I" _- ?, W& }* |" n
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong! f0 J8 U- t0 }3 [: z
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
' g( Y, V) D* g9 D: ~of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that. [7 O5 h# ]) a4 I
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are6 i8 H8 q7 t; Q( Q) p
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a( y/ o; p9 q8 j% n. p) m0 b6 q
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
) d u$ F* P0 n2 [2 G; }want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
* |& s# u7 L, T% r, s8 U* jto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is5 `5 S* N! \" Z" _4 ]/ |) z
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,. j/ R$ m. ^6 `7 i
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
, E/ G0 v: ?2 Z. |5 g4 x$ M& hstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to: u1 a+ G# R' {3 V H
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make. M6 y, p( w6 G, [9 ]) @8 Q
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
2 K! e2 u2 x7 |7 n; b' }; Za beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
! Y$ }$ ]: O& @$ I. B1 ~ H1 f5 yparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
2 [7 q0 c3 @6 }5 R$ s* |# Fthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
. f- c% m3 G2 H* X* y6 gimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
* S; h% M( q5 h5 fdevelopment.
Hutongs. y! M: s4 {+ f
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived" ]3 R3 B- a" q3 M
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
, O3 G" n w0 z. [% T* T: D; Rin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not- O& Z: ?6 P) Z+ y
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you1 X) ?. `; q2 X* L7 _# V, h
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.2 c! T$ b/ C, l& o1 I/ m
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date- E4 p1 `) `9 k% u! C3 P& m6 N' r
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used) B! j" G$ M( z# X: q
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses8 u! e" y+ f( o9 @: a1 T+ `
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
& P# c( z4 J% z. d* Uunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
- E4 R& b) H% m) I9 W# Klive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
( [: Z" j& L0 J) `# y4 |6 Yhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the% e! Y0 M) q* N# w2 K1 ]8 Y
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the a7 M& ]7 L/ ]- E+ l4 c2 B
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
" Y, W& r5 q3 G1 B& Zrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
c% F$ \+ k2 GMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how6 ]6 B6 k) g- V
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
% [; E( q7 R3 h9 `; N4 A' wtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished' ~6 M: ]) Y/ P7 S) l
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".% Q; m, z1 a; H4 q a0 W, V
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
3 I+ [3 `7 X# d* w9 haligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
+ K+ P7 G6 ]8 Onon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image& x) N) E% k, w& O/ C
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these0 |$ E$ Q& y& M! h$ I+ k) \1 c
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
2 ~& W) U0 R7 f% @+ Z8 x7 Jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they+ F( ]: l `8 P. [# `
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
6 T, L2 D! x- m2 Tof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
6 q8 ^ o9 [8 A$ N8 L M8 p# g"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
% E! Y. ^2 Q4 S6 L( Xpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
4 k4 G9 r% J+ K6 b' m4 f! D7 {apartments are the way to go? No., _7 L7 x. y' z4 F; A
. l3 ^6 }/ |2 k& d& w9 W
3 m4 Y: c5 ]: |' m, Z9 u, |$ y
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
5 [ J M2 @% S; M7 d& ]situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
* D) C3 z% n0 o8 E, A/ q& f'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
V( |& d& D) ~- G+ u$ ono money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
# B: L4 p% d7 ~+ D) @9 T7 b* K: hfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant2 w& \% k/ ]( B
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
" W/ ~5 [6 ^3 q- yBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is' v' Z7 n& j4 g2 v' o2 w6 h
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|