UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its( h0 r/ u6 w3 h! T; f. o+ u
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider) j3 u6 x/ H0 }8 ]' f7 t1 c
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"4 U: l( E! n9 N$ h# ^1 K
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
- L0 C/ _) l6 KAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,5 Z3 V9 r* n. |( V7 o: J, L& N
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
$ B0 d; [* ] GManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within. ^" e( F' X: W4 `+ X
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
: W+ l, |0 x) ?) R$ K8 Heach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera+ Y$ d" y" B8 o% F! f' z4 M0 C9 I
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
( `3 k9 R; g6 y& R, c U6 Nharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
1 f3 Y+ ~1 \5 Z' udescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
' \! l, x: F! k& x* o5 A8 L) P8 ?) Rforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
8 G' J* P$ k0 g F& m' R Hwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
c1 c, v$ u% x; ]impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,: g7 S. m# d: [* e
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong, U- D7 s s) S4 t
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
- D: x- b0 k4 W4 j3 Z9 C, c4 }of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that, @" F# V) {! a6 d; j
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are0 W- W% Z m/ u) D6 `4 U/ u
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
8 p, j% \: e! b8 Y% i% isort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government q! o8 i8 b5 }2 g* C3 N
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
& y1 Z$ ~, S' {8 g: Ato the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
5 C e% \ Z+ {+ r6 ^7 A* j% k"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,# S8 q# C6 ^# h& [0 K* h
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are- J' Q* x* D! O
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to1 P% [" o0 X, k- k6 s' Y
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
# \5 Y y; R4 E7 \money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was1 O7 w/ J) b% `9 I
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a1 j6 j! Z' b3 c! |% G' n1 ^. Y
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across$ ?/ z( A) W. Z+ E- C& Y
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural% T+ ~' h4 ~3 o1 Y& r
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for( R7 T2 ~2 D8 K, k( |8 b
development.
Hutongs
! K. H/ A# |8 ]in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
3 B3 x2 ^8 Q" B4 V% V2 |! Qthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
8 `3 K, w% ?- w9 Q3 ]in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
( f' ?) v* v3 P. f* N; K2 d" ~5 t8 Vhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you$ B. P8 S! n8 ?5 t/ x k
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
; E7 Z, Y$ S9 z: DFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
1 {# k$ l4 g' C) g: j" Eto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
/ j& U2 h7 J$ Z: {( Y2 }to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
( V5 `! C! u% t8 |$ I2 k- k! u) X; qsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically+ J, ]- @1 b# k! b% Y+ o# d7 p$ A
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to5 ], `3 @; H1 M+ T
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
/ \$ `, F( B# vhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the! e3 F6 w6 g* g4 V8 \) o+ D
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
. P4 s7 d: M. Z- |project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be1 d+ T! r+ c; K0 d7 C& o
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
: z H. w" h/ ]% {6 iMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how# [" U! P. H# B6 k% `$ ^( j* i
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
& _% R2 X% y- ~( q P: \torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished& `1 R; @! C4 @% r" k1 k3 R2 q# D. S7 T+ z
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".; I/ w$ I% k# X( A9 p% @2 j R
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are* I4 e* }+ r& D9 V% W. H) Q+ `
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially* i& R" a1 n) S* T
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
$ d: t1 p: p$ l+ Z0 L4 Kof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these0 n$ r1 c( P) I" p$ L7 ^
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 F* |/ t: L- {
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
. V$ ^. ?7 [& N7 o8 d) G8 s+ _5 M5 ]may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
! q4 c1 t" O: ^! O# uof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before o: g$ c, X1 q
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all0 l7 W5 f9 h( h' e
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
8 X. N9 [6 T3 `* ~4 C+ s" _7 Tapartments are the way to go? No.0 H- S& P2 F8 [1 d9 H
& }/ {% p5 S9 ^) P. g+ u; @3 d5 I
8 i: c6 s" S: g# T4 H
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
5 K6 {+ l2 |6 M1 j2 b; J4 c. n1 A! msituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this( R: d& C0 X2 X0 b
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make; I( P0 Y0 t: l1 j! P& K" B/ Q/ P
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
& W! U& Y4 n* _! S& [( w7 @! ] a3 mfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant+ o# F, _ e4 v
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
2 C$ g0 ?7 P, }. \$ g4 y; g% UBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
# j- A3 N7 \7 q" xunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|