服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6776|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its! k% H, u% Z9 T' y architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider; b4 D" d! a; Y+ i' I. L. C7 Y Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"; \- H! a/ b( J6 K city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. . W6 S3 N* d$ `5 |. vAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,) I9 X( n. \0 k z 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 o! g' _* _ v& E. o9 H9 l7 L Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within9 \7 j) r+ ]) T* V' M4 E hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ! l4 z9 v" u; Q9 z. z9 w& j+ A- Veach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera- q- Y1 M) d: y7 D3 I' i( w and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is( q) T/ F: n3 d1 a8 d+ b6 W" o harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 _" B+ U1 E* x# @2 H0 s5 e descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and % u) j$ d( w& Eforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ' [/ j5 K. _- Owas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great# m7 ~- H1 I% J! ?; e4 \* K$ a impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, * T+ C0 M0 s# O6 @and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 2 k1 m3 L& @7 Ghas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment - i( l* `7 B9 W$ l* J' X2 dof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ! }, w! [+ ?4 f: Q8 n/ ano hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are$ p- o6 l( e* b6 v: w( P only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ' p! C5 e+ E1 W' f3 B% Isort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government: b+ x- W& z N' d# h want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move: N. p ?; e0 a# }7 j6 G/ ] to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is% w6 P# U! t! D5 Y6 o "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, / I7 |3 f* Q5 A9 V! Uthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are2 V6 z M I+ W! F" t, H still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 5 k4 R% ^5 }. e1 A: Q"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make7 B' }% n( i; ^ money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' f; V. Z+ I) B, C a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a# N8 D+ g9 `- k' e parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 8 m J9 K) F0 U0 x7 }the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural & r7 |' f, N$ B. W; A7 |importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 Y( z% u q4 b3 I2 b. d2 Z development.

Hutongs ) f% T0 w- p" T0 |( X9 sin the old days were residential area where people actually lived: [/ v! H1 M$ ?5 F there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 [: Z m$ b c; t, q5 \7 H, T- @ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 9 A6 ?. E% | `0 Y* \ b# i2 lhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 5 F% U0 R9 k' x: [: ?4 [/ @* |; g9 Dwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs." E+ o# d& E" ^9 K Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date. j3 U; ~' I. |+ X2 Q. u& t; f5 W to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ( Q7 Q( ^% F" f! [1 o1 f1 Z/ Bto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 8 F$ _8 v3 H& Esupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically8 f }& ?4 b- Y! u3 u, I z+ w unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ; p5 Z1 D- H2 \% o5 e& s* klive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,* F; d# e8 I; |, d hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 9 `8 x7 v& C' Fbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the " Y% z# R7 r9 O, [5 b8 Iproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 3 y) ?& f! p, G2 n4 P7 B6 krenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong( O F! P- i, N; \" z7 u Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how- q& M+ X6 X3 x% n people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be * o0 {9 x$ u) Ztorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished# K% p6 @, @" P+ `3 R memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"., l+ g( P7 t& L U r$ _# A* e2 n Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are - a |4 ~- a8 h* P- {aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially" ?7 x( h. \9 m6 K4 H1 d non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image * T- v+ J3 G( D- h: l2 wof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ' t% B" `' P ~Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those0 m$ f' C2 C: | p1 o0 A+ L people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they $ C) \! A" o/ S6 m0 d, _may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some * k7 v/ \: l6 h9 Vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before $ M- L" X. p% Y ^6 y! G, W"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all " x$ c ^. B3 Epeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 8 V& k: Q d0 _) v( I( yapartments are the way to go? No. 7 I0 k5 }+ e4 e % p# Q( Z* @' @* Z; N: s r1 e 7 k& g( c2 u# |3 o" Q+ T

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ! I) h1 Z7 ?3 e w. V8 f: R+ `situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this' f% d/ F5 J6 h1 T4 `; V 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make % G) {$ Z) } L8 ~( i% Qno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so5 E7 ?9 E! W1 _' o fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant$ j, J% ]6 O" r4 M( U resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless& e) a( e) u* @' E, X) { Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 8 j9 C8 U. N, _unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-19 12:29 , Processed in 0.114531 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部