服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6403|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its0 J7 \. S. o* z2 d/ y" f, A architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider6 D) Q$ r. Q8 {/ T Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 5 |' _. P3 B2 E( ycity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture., `; s0 U: p" a0 ^4 a4 T According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, : m, W/ C* |+ K( c5 _) C$ L( y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 5 b2 p3 J( {: AManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within' H+ k$ x2 { Z, ` b9 Z. d hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among/ u( p, H% v; L each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera * }: G7 A5 x/ s0 t4 }9 z6 l0 w: Y. kand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is; m: q: [9 k9 P( Y( [ harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 4 D0 _9 _- \/ U4 fdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and # g5 I" {" }: l- s0 i' fforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 2 Q- t; F5 f* L: l. Owas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great) F9 C& H g- f) }5 Y* m" T impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,8 @' ^8 q7 T4 i+ _' a5 e and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 1 M0 u; t8 o; ]! y7 n9 a, s7 s, \has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment @" K% V6 \7 | of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that & E7 g5 w, a- h! f% x0 @no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are- s* I7 o0 f g8 N* N1 f0 [7 p only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a2 ?! g$ V* R+ K" Q \5 i& k- U: n sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government3 }# L# S& C% ~$ X- o9 l4 o want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move * \! ^$ P8 F1 ]1 K* }to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is3 r1 Q, j' F, m$ \9 x2 |( a "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,( s8 `! {: B$ P! V this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ m# j& n. ]+ l still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to+ d' ?, v/ m3 v7 a6 | "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ f. K" U& T( p, [2 r6 C" u& Q money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was {9 O$ A1 q* p. y2 }a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a* ~4 g n: t9 \/ K parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across ) h2 t$ d& U9 L1 W* Ethe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural5 |; u6 p1 J+ r! V, U( ^8 j importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; m& `, |$ i9 B2 j% b" W; p development.

Hutongs 5 J* w( }: c' h2 h- N7 Min the old days were residential area where people actually lived 3 B# Y# s+ B7 r, T3 w7 w: G0 pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions7 X% Q0 g% }8 L in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 8 P1 }4 B2 K8 p) p( Ihave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 9 ~. I& M( k( ~5 ~1 Z V y1 qwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.) \( O$ ~* m: H4 v4 W Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date+ W6 A+ G! ^9 i+ l- P' h4 D# Q; n to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used , }/ T! B9 I* _9 M3 p" cto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ; `4 z+ m+ ]; | V* n% ]1 _1 ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 8 { N/ W& h1 X3 nunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to6 O) e8 X- E9 L2 Z' a$ L" r live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 9 M) b& P& H( s( L' Y Lhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the * D, c. O o U4 Z+ Ybalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the " a( G# I E- I2 _' T7 kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 0 f1 n' H k+ N3 f4 T0 i" Rrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong $ b3 u* a: R9 l/ B HMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ' `4 T7 p0 y3 b& ipeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 5 l# o+ G% b( P9 F# o4 Ptorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished- v( M1 A. p1 K. n& x; S+ {) e memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". / ]9 ?9 e5 D4 _& n/ BNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ( f1 Y2 o; V) C/ X) baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially: y: _0 ` t" ?4 H% G5 q non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 0 A+ d. v2 L: ~8 L9 Nof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these , N* ]6 J6 M* ]8 k9 g% |Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those0 n) k9 b6 A$ h' E) `% r people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 6 B9 a) e3 F$ A1 J" x5 Pmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some1 U. Z+ c0 h; R, E \ of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before $ b9 O$ D2 H1 R0 F( C"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 6 h6 H8 g6 \1 {' @% Rpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . R; I, X3 h- _/ ?( [9 Japartments are the way to go? No. 9 p1 }( z# p* F5 J: [" X % A+ z6 U1 D3 u2 N! \) V % q3 r& {5 H4 L; _ F8 v8 N- q

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the D4 W) G4 T/ \1 s& n situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this $ P- a8 A! S/ S'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make & D9 A9 Q& C" v Kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so$ a' Q, K- d t, K fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant: b" l8 D3 S1 n& ^; v resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ' j k2 U# y+ f5 K" FBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is& k. `$ q, s" ]! ]+ u unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-12 04:20 , Processed in 0.125930 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部