服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6572|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; r! R2 J$ x+ D7 M2 L architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider; _6 y0 {' ]2 Z. u Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"& P, U. W* j* J# {. L+ A city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture." F/ K7 g& q; n9 @! W$ K According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, . N+ ?: E5 d* d p5 Y# n3 h, S3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of% ], s/ P7 i( x0 G% \. x Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within8 w+ i# s! j+ V* p0 O x hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among3 M. J) q7 U4 Q8 {3 ~& g4 D$ v" f each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ) s6 D3 q+ X3 C) Nand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is * [! Y: ]* R6 jharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 4 E: m" h. k2 t4 E" }' mdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and . n0 U* R2 G4 J$ Q4 ?forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 5 h0 [/ a- k# ?1 Y! lwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ) N5 m2 ~* a# I0 y: j" \impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, " G$ X* q. ]; U4 cand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong! P" n$ j% [# }5 J$ } has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment) c# z: m: H$ H5 e' @ of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 1 z" H. e; _5 Vno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are# b, V; v% q4 i0 u: R: K( |. m; A only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a # h6 @/ Z! t, W1 B" W7 dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ; l+ |* [1 {+ A, N' ~& E0 Kwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move" g# l; h( q+ M to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 4 `9 v0 r# Y- }5 x4 |) l+ R/ z"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,6 L& u) h% H8 W1 f% ` this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are : E% Q0 r4 I0 ^( dstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to% ?, X8 `! C8 O/ _: X. u "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make7 [0 x* Z+ `* s2 I! t money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was + a4 T' h0 u0 p9 u6 Ra beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a # P* P3 j# {) y: r5 R- Z! hparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across0 R) z. y" k5 t3 h! q the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural- X- g: O1 R5 I# q" w importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for: W# D; C5 Q* B& L$ W development.

Hutongs 8 \+ `+ y$ x( P' I! ^' Ain the old days were residential area where people actually lived, b' J! h/ G% j there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 7 C' R5 Q$ K/ t( K4 c" win hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 3 w. y9 U$ ?2 J$ [" H" Ohave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you4 Q+ {5 I; R. I7 S N ]' {! l g will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 9 G: p9 T1 A7 l1 u' JFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date2 c$ @; Q% j1 ]% l4 @+ d6 ^ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 o/ l" D' H" J! C0 M3 a0 Q3 d6 O to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses + O4 b: P) x: L- _9 Msupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 9 v9 c! k' ~5 g f: D/ W% eunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to# q5 d& d. k8 j' v) K+ t5 q) q live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,3 u# Y, N! ?* y- {& o! O$ H hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 6 i9 v, g1 y9 K, o! G- hbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 2 `! n/ g/ s" o, Nproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be' Y$ P H" F$ y/ e8 l8 d renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong# X2 r- q3 `, F$ Z2 G Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 7 e r& ]8 a+ g2 L( ?- Tpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be; _6 R @! Y' \+ P torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ; F2 l8 O0 \ s' n; V0 M+ Lmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". + P! s& N1 G+ |/ nNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are2 z( k1 d/ F* S: l' v+ H aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially: p% X- ^: B- E. D3 v% P" U& | non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 8 k2 s. Q& h2 V( `7 t" Sof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these - a9 A+ D/ R( i# U& H' Q9 F/ }) OHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those + T8 i/ H; M; A0 q4 H6 ipeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they . e# `) g6 F6 X2 N& [. xmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some2 z# D1 I& h ~% F of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before + h( l) C: H K4 @/ A"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all" [% N% G- e& u& a9 B people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 9 s6 B3 I9 E6 K0 f9 kapartments are the way to go? No.6 @/ ~4 {0 B% F. l6 o' ?! ^/ m2 }& { / p0 Q! A1 L' X7 O" x% r( ]8 T . J! Q% `# b+ f( |

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the$ F) T+ P. S* ]9 L5 N situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this, l5 Y" f" g: X3 l: O9 x$ F 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make" @" V, X1 c# T* t+ U no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 7 _) L" _" S" W5 i5 S( `fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant " N( G) g1 A6 H( t8 u* kresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 8 d& B+ y& }& K& TBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is# q( j% \5 Z) C6 A unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-27 12:13 , Processed in 0.134662 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部