UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its7 J; v5 K% ]5 Z9 y( c
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
# P' O* u3 \! s, |6 e% ~Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
; |+ t8 k8 M7 E0 B, Bcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
7 t4 G/ a1 X% S$ l; W/ r1 ZAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
; e; a: y# p H" y- V( D3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of) ?% |4 h7 u8 H+ D' e0 \
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
6 X8 l1 R1 x& w5 i% p2 J2 X, `/ {hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
3 m: H% n: E- h. ceach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
- m5 s% G) b* B. D3 c6 m. o$ oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
, G; H+ N1 |$ iharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are- R$ I( U7 J, Z( u, @
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
6 P4 J3 k* o5 d# nforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I5 m5 C/ S) j8 R, L
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great0 Y9 ^ N; g d# O- Q
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,* O: `! L5 n0 y& t7 ~: t0 K
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong. q2 T2 Y+ {7 f! K) [
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment1 f1 J4 O" c& B2 ~0 ^
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
# f& Y! a: ? f8 j8 R! Pno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are' z- d( D$ R; e3 \
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
, B- y p' f7 x2 T4 O) H! osort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
( \: u8 ]# ], |/ jwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
: E( T: [. B# y; c: z, P& fto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
- C: ?0 g$ i2 t2 p& {"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
" U& v! A J* x/ @$ \' s* fthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
4 w! Y0 x# [5 Zstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
: R$ `- x" b/ P9 ~& K"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
- ]$ H2 A/ b$ z, [9 gmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was" K( s3 T% ?# D" ^6 X/ |
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
5 Z6 r5 m. c, m: gparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
2 q& R# r4 |3 I# jthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural: y3 G* i9 k# I9 B0 l
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; s n$ M1 k; q3 I6 s" |
development.
Hutongs
! b' [. _$ T: |' N7 rin the old days were residential area where people actually lived7 v! J9 U% z; ?0 L& \
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
1 i, O9 f' e) h- x1 m$ M5 pin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not2 x: q; I# k; L" u% r1 h
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
8 ~$ i! W/ n0 b. v% K6 Z; M9 Iwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
% h' `2 M4 \% F, M* QFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
! d' T: y: X4 H6 Lto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used# B; j { o E$ c* {7 z9 Z+ @
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses. Q% l, F! n" H$ B6 }3 U+ |" I
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically0 w9 J4 V8 I) ?4 B4 L' h5 h8 H9 k& Y
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to6 Z1 d! ^" S) r4 F' j* {" F0 `# X
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,8 ^5 o; G$ E# k1 \- K
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the* E: w0 `) Z1 X! m
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
! W8 l; S0 z; U& y+ P$ yproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
8 f5 O: V+ ]$ ^: h6 I! N4 Rrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong+ F. i7 O5 v. r$ K2 i
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how1 M( i6 p& }( }( H4 D
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be0 I/ I5 }! Z% P
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished( F+ C! U; A* d! T C
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
" ] Q) `/ M% L3 x7 V7 k6 vNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
: V* B: m4 l" } Baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
! M( f Q' ]4 I$ T( [8 `non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
N i7 T- a! R* B- eof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these7 _- ]" W' y3 r/ d u, d
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
# I: n; h4 S, i$ lpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they* R! M+ N; u, I
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
) d) P! n: [/ [of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
( C! K" h9 H& d+ w4 _! V9 l; K"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
X: d, l/ Q% F$ m0 ^) h) R% f, ?people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
! X. Z. L8 }( b9 S1 M, p& gapartments are the way to go? No.) L% h( n6 [( ^8 w' M% D
# m/ F/ q: u. \6 A0 S$ G% p
! k0 E5 r# g. R( ~) U- x% s' o
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
% F$ C4 |: @3 Z1 o5 X5 ]( ^situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this$ `) K4 l% O( i+ h& m( w6 b) y. e
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make0 e6 T; I! ~9 P: n' B Q0 V
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so9 {8 D6 ~8 [. [
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
) i2 a1 }% `! F, zresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
8 O" a6 Q, Q, E4 z iBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
* O$ ]0 V* A& y, K: dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|