服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6799|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its * r/ p0 M) B* R/ earchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 7 U: X# g5 ^0 Y' ~8 TBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 3 H( K$ X! n( X% a) ocity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ) b) V. m+ @* d8 a& N4 K# pAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,# R, w) V$ G/ p) R0 ]( P9 }" M$ v 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of # m; g1 J3 ~$ nManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within' _" ]6 ]4 _4 K; v hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among/ f% ?6 p+ n s* y1 @ each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ; s( b8 H* W0 |and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is , a& ]) Z) [; ]6 m/ o" r) |harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are " R$ z! h# ]. M" ~3 ]descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and3 { p: }8 T& w9 e% g$ W( x+ I" M3 i forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I1 M7 w3 l, Y+ w4 r6 k was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 5 W8 _7 v% Y# b2 |" t5 `0 }impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 9 N$ s" P1 M6 A$ Oand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 7 U4 [7 E7 I+ l# G2 Nhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 9 R: I4 U+ M2 E( oof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that0 i$ ]3 }/ } R no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are+ f, T0 q6 h3 F" O/ N$ ~3 u" b4 H1 y only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a% H7 ]$ R# V# P sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 9 O" T( k+ O( C4 ^9 o' ?want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ' q8 I8 F! b. |) o. eto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 8 s2 |* v! }, F* B' P4 h4 G1 Q"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 ~. m6 x" ]; Y4 |2 H this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ! m& F& k1 K5 c3 m# v# a- lstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to # i& l6 V% Q2 ? g"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make' i- y; L+ A* }/ v: }& C money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 5 g) v4 ]* e* w* ~a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 8 M" U/ M4 Q! N' x$ \4 S1 [parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 1 Q, L$ A8 f4 g$ o+ _the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ; z: V6 n W& zimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for * X4 C" M+ C9 j% U& C3 zdevelopment.

Hutongs ( Z+ c' o/ q- a5 b! f! nin the old days were residential area where people actually lived% L. y( l8 f+ r9 T& F/ ~ there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions" @% ~# O, a& n$ ~" u in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not . e0 F8 X, Y9 t+ K; t1 r' ~. f; Ghave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 9 H7 n/ u2 L2 I- w- z* Zwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.3 J8 z& f3 q3 H' p2 N* D Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date j# v% o; v5 b, \+ _/ R' Y to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used / R; w6 Y0 F) f6 T0 ?. R; mto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses) M9 y% H' O+ h/ E% N( p: m6 h$ p support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically * d4 B" [8 U" H' |- Y1 |9 Uunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 8 }4 R: g/ q/ _6 o" `& Q$ J1 F8 Llive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,+ ~- t# f3 y& T0 G7 ]3 ~ hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the+ l9 g* |* w7 o balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the k) b' y) m0 V/ p project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 6 v. a% `0 f2 `" O4 c1 e- F2 l& arenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 0 l3 }* [4 b, `( cMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how$ n5 H$ Z* Z* ~; w people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be / o( d2 j+ T" M storn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished0 h3 V" {! d$ T* Z5 E$ ~0 I1 Q memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".' T7 v7 ~: Y9 ]2 O: U _# F6 x' Z! _ Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are; Q1 C) y& L$ p* E aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 9 T1 m y7 ?. S8 g! Knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 6 A9 a2 G7 L$ M$ _ {# Zof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these2 I" N3 \" q' {+ L' z1 O Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those4 a" J8 O# ^( i5 ~& c/ N people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they / j) e5 j. h+ _( a `. o3 Y; Rmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some / |7 M. j) h9 T X' s: _+ V& Nof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before " Y$ R: T1 q2 D" f"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all/ w2 p- \: P; t3 \/ q1 b* c- U" d/ J people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise* M( G) ~# j @: i( y" X" l8 ?6 c8 F apartments are the way to go? No. 0 `$ J0 U# z: N8 y+ V' D9 ^ 5 E% r* X, S: g3 |2 l & [5 E, k9 w# j7 L& ?

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the # T5 Z e, w5 |situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this9 G$ P/ \5 e. q9 b0 B. ^ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make Z4 Y7 {0 E; m7 L5 i0 m4 d3 fno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so( ?+ F5 L. S" |! L2 O# m0 z8 A fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant' Z& ~ M: _4 E7 E' E resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless& [( q' Q# r9 F. g0 _- z' f( c Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ; d: S/ ~& u4 T2 n5 ~& t" w2 d) dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-22 13:53 , Processed in 0.115569 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部