UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
1 v% z' \! f8 d0 |2 `" ^$ yarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
7 Y" q4 q: {6 w, |' pBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian": Z2 ~; o8 B. x* h1 {. E" [
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
" r/ E/ `3 t# O: @6 A$ t) F8 I. k7 ZAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,% m- a& x7 p) W$ Y- a
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of$ S, ]% R c' X$ n
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within+ m2 P- s" f J2 S e4 Z
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
, T7 h. X, |1 s1 aeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
& z2 h; q& M. oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is: M* T4 X0 t+ n7 l; C
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are$ t; l9 V* c- E! U' w: P: @8 u
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
7 e" ]; H4 P, }& G- iforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
/ } U5 J9 |1 }6 F/ u9 Awas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great! r5 N7 N' d9 X' g2 x
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
# s8 q! f) a5 o* T$ U* Wand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
7 I3 t% W {. _2 Q; T' Bhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
( O, B/ K( ]1 Fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
4 K9 H4 y( s( H( ]no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
! c( `, N* }6 l; e) b7 c+ ]# s/ l- gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
! Q6 |& ~, g* X# }sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
2 ?1 p, H: X2 a. M1 Q" Q, L- Z; z, w7 Mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- y. p0 a; C! @
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
9 d+ r7 d0 v: o6 {"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
, E4 S7 E1 Q( |) Zthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are9 T7 h5 k/ i" c5 ?- E. J' k
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to8 l- x' |4 \$ A9 b
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make) f: K5 y5 N9 E5 T2 a
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was0 [$ T @# I& D- m% G
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a" w; V2 l- b# l
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
: X& a5 l \9 |" n, k9 gthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural o9 q. q8 x* }- Q2 e( G( P
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 y' P4 Y( L7 F; x
development.
Hutongs
6 A( ]- X) G& F% @- s& |in the old days were residential area where people actually lived6 x7 n$ z( ?; s: u O( S
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
2 ^. o" H8 }! q, Y: R7 T9 din hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
. \4 \5 R! O2 f3 Jhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ~. O% v- u" L1 x/ r- }7 Y" m
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.# N) R: c7 r2 R' X! q3 l! h
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 J- c* z( c* F0 W) [ H
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
' G& L$ _5 t2 o* c0 @to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
$ w& h! s1 H1 @8 T: E) ^4 lsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically6 W: L; e- V" H* \7 N7 X- N
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to1 Q) q0 c" D9 h% s; e; ^( n
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
. W& y1 |' L. ~9 o5 }& r* Ihutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the/ f/ W$ j+ p+ o+ u+ R
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the# x! L; c2 f W$ R1 C
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be3 p" m* @ ^* L: @
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong g" \3 D5 ~7 p; l) V
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how; k( ]/ A: T8 B, X* u' p3 E
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be2 ~2 u; B6 y6 e$ Q
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished" U! r: _6 F& a' l
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".) H& g; q" g* Z7 ^# E
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
l8 K, Y, B1 H; z, @aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
% w! e% X: a% Q7 x1 \: Q5 Znon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
5 E& t+ y; F* O2 J$ kof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
( o: B4 k$ W& @% t8 K& CHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those) q; P1 o' e% O5 {
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they8 B2 S, _ [5 U
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some; B; B0 y- V- l3 E5 e) @1 O* d
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before* v- b" L. ~2 m( c, A) p: ~5 `2 u
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
( ~, |* x: N7 \, s! Vpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise: a3 H8 q$ G& s) x
apartments are the way to go? No.9 T3 D0 p s% x3 v E2 ^' E
! X9 t: _% X3 F) v- [' ?& ?
! R5 x3 v1 Q% b
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the! Q8 I2 ^" p- u6 V; K
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
) b R: Y- {8 U2 T. y3 S9 q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make4 u4 K: f! \) q }; D8 H1 d, h" s0 k
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so4 _7 d4 A! m- s+ t6 B* Z: Q' m& x6 P
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
: |! c' F! l* w1 \resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 u% x7 E. t( S1 N) |% s
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
5 w5 P x% w) g6 X% x' ]1 Munlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|