UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; ?7 n( m: t' O
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
2 ?! V( P! ?7 }! j X! ZBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
* u8 S" {) K, O) ]city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.; Q, O- ?' J/ _( y0 c) T% ]3 P1 N' M2 `1 z
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,# H2 ~: p) I. i# D/ U4 @
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of8 N) l6 X" {8 T% p$ V. G( A* A3 m
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
; P3 P x1 F9 `' A5 C% P$ ~hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among5 r4 l/ x3 A7 R' o
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
) Z* W7 L3 g0 K1 H3 Yand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is+ t! f( N/ `* B
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
9 z% e" d! W1 W' g0 Q$ R8 idescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
6 W+ D, L* h6 z) M) ~4 hforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
1 U- ]9 M) Y; i) x6 zwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
5 N6 h4 y1 k2 Y# M6 f1 \2 r' pimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
; ?. O7 U s j/ I; s; uand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
& M/ O6 f8 _' p% E4 Q3 ^has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
) U0 u# b$ F% X V/ t: @of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! {# o4 m! l! o9 w! K/ J/ F; B
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
( e/ w8 L+ O9 N' }only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
+ C% s" o ^: X% F8 q8 O m+ Fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
( }' _4 ]' v% G2 Mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move" o+ T" |8 T. m8 f
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is7 H2 `1 J3 A, \9 V4 Q
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
" M' x; b4 u* I7 M( ethis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are5 R% `1 n4 c1 o1 c: i b
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
# r. o) G5 N0 q ^( \"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
8 c; Z3 g- H" F, o# b; i, q3 G7 Bmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
; f8 t/ S6 z' D- k7 z, la beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
1 i9 z- F6 u L* ^9 O v& ?parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
% F" {; [% x7 u9 B; Dthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural1 F( L0 A; }( D2 C
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for. [1 d! D) ?% D1 T, r$ r! K
development.
Hutongs
. @( f2 B9 J" E# F: bin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
7 a; ~- O4 D$ K& d+ G- G7 ithere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
6 p- K6 `4 r, ?2 _, {" xin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
! \1 p [. f7 o! o- W7 fhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
% K6 v: U x$ e0 B: P6 @& P2 ^will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
, P% Y% Y6 u8 T8 k% A+ JFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date C3 G# _4 b0 o$ Y
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
% @4 N. d) v2 d4 }! B3 {to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
$ h( I! X2 c* w; o& `# z* asupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically! W) F4 w5 j; O/ s7 ]- y( c) x+ q
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 Z/ o4 c) u4 n) z
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' z( W9 E* S- }8 F
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the7 a ~1 w- E' O2 A. v
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
5 z( |* p# i% h+ ?' kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
* w* l; V" I# z; I. I# S- J3 Lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
% Z- k- z. [( D' XMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how" L" U0 P" y3 R, a' h0 p
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
( [9 \5 M/ U0 ~: P: Otorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
0 F8 M8 C6 L. L7 m- ]+ v7 c7 T" ~memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
x, c( g9 m! G4 INothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
; o u* h0 U( g3 l6 U, `! y% [aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
3 Y/ H6 I- a4 \1 n# Jnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
- H, _7 X! {0 e' }# d) Cof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
1 ~" a0 |: R A. M8 N' [7 g- jHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those& v }/ _/ G. |' N
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they5 C& K% i: T/ G! `% F3 c, g
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" b; |- u$ O0 R0 Z6 p% E5 ]9 Q$ V
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
% ]) I! H8 a2 ?$ q3 q! O) H- R"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
/ @3 b! m7 |+ G `" r4 Rpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise" N" N& R" ^& m }* C
apartments are the way to go? No.
! g. F7 C# K9 H+ Y/ r) A 2 b G2 S5 H) q
- o( P% s% s, z% T" F `
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the6 e6 B) l/ o: y2 O) }0 V2 F( }( V, a
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
/ c: w. Z2 {/ W V, t" |( K'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
S# U! E) n9 L( c. T" a/ k/ o: r/ Ino money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so% }; _2 t) n o. B R' U7 `
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant. Q; v- u2 L$ b# V- l
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
7 ]7 V; i' @' h/ X' UBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
8 Y0 c* d$ o" M7 y5 Vunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|