|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6043|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ' E" D# r' Y7 M1 E$ `0 m* Tarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider$ ^& o& A) B! U! q# q% j+ |: m. g( ? Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" + g$ f( B6 {6 C6 E$ ?' t vcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.3 f1 ?: A0 {, X* {/ [ k9 u" i9 b According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 8 x: Z7 [$ e# n) Q3 g3 ?3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of4 l1 p5 A# J+ d3 E9 f) s Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within$ R; i; | N3 Z( D" P, ]' D( y hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( I, M) S+ h, [0 C7 n each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 9 O) \) G0 k7 |- S/ band Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is7 y. b! [% o4 O( f+ L4 v harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are l7 g8 J' b7 d. v: B! S$ l3 B descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and% ^+ Q( Z! f$ a. J4 K) H, k forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I( j# ?: F+ M: X x- d1 {9 Q was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 2 O2 L6 N: W5 {* t% V% a" wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, h a# a" u# N% M8 h, q and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 6 o* N0 ]+ f1 ^; H; Z" N1 Zhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 0 E8 v5 t9 r8 {6 dof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that( M- Y' k3 @# R$ Z; m+ U4 X no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are1 f ^9 X3 t$ i. v only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a/ F6 p6 `& G! \; E8 B% ?1 q sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government$ N4 _4 Q [" H; z2 Z want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move+ e0 g3 \/ b' r/ r9 p+ i to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is( s; h% [ E, L0 h "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, # u1 Z. i) a; ?+ y) P5 i! Y xthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ! A# m' D" q3 r7 l. estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to' n: Y3 S$ y% p1 n3 m+ S "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make" O- [9 p0 {3 |, C money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, W) |' F+ m3 | a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a6 P; M& s; }: e parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across/ p* N+ v9 T& M+ A t- ~ the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural4 _' J4 X/ W, Q* [! ^/ L( i importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for R" T& s; d! P" W: v2 _ development.

Hutongs- n. h9 E2 Y3 P; r. g4 \ in the old days were residential area where people actually lived / m) ?! L4 [6 sthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions0 P2 C9 V1 m0 j6 j' w in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not! h5 |; N* z- U. J have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ) p, [. `9 i" }$ k7 w. g5 \2 M7 pwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. . X- P6 n/ U0 @- K; VFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date0 C1 a0 f M4 w! U to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 6 p2 s3 t5 o( J0 q% j; L" sto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 ^% p. p8 [% Q9 X, }9 w. u$ _ support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically / {% M" r% O& Dunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 6 o* F: y% J8 P/ qlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ' Y# Y: T9 G' ]* q! Khutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the : }, Z% b0 B1 i+ l+ [balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the + a! ^9 R' ]3 u- y8 _project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 0 x9 g; c$ Q3 F. [5 b" Srenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong , ^- M( F0 Q: m) o; `7 S2 P$ u2 ZMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how + H9 l& `! a* y. j, j6 bpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be : k, q0 M5 y) S% ctorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished: A9 _9 W: r6 ] memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".6 i2 q$ B" g9 `; ?* [ Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are , C$ X! Z9 P4 r2 B9 c+ baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially. L. H$ h+ e7 f+ V/ b' q5 Z non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image7 F0 W5 j( o) r6 q- D of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ; J7 P5 M2 W. \0 H" W5 s: qHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 0 R0 N* _% b- p5 D4 N9 |& l5 \people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they7 k1 Y. a6 i0 a may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some * u+ _, E [$ j5 N4 c! Yof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ; ?$ ^# Z0 j6 X5 E: t"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 7 l/ }6 D: g4 V) ^" ^people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . S9 A& q) Q- |apartments are the way to go? No. & e( T7 g, F- M; n* v" l* @ f( T" r$ a. L7 f* Y Q 1 J8 e$ r5 o. g3 C) v5 r- B

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the % ~; N, ?2 O0 X* F* ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ! C% I( d$ Y6 b# j* X5 Q6 A+ X( {'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 3 _5 |" r8 J; \( H; N4 h6 h* yno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 0 o# I- B$ W2 x( O' efast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, P# @- ]: W; d# K0 c resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 2 H; [6 I- R, g# mBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is + @- V6 K; ]& Iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-8-21 09:04 , Processed in 1.142105 second(s), 6 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部