UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
' E" D# r' Y7 M1 E$ `0 m* Tarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider$ ^& o& A) B! U! q# q% j+ |: m. g( ?
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
+ g$ f( B6 {6 C6 E$ ?' t vcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.3 f1 ?: A0 {, X* {/ [ k9 u" i9 b
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
8 x: Z7 [$ e# n) Q3 g3 ?3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of4 l1 p5 A# J+ d3 E9 f) s
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within$ R; i; | N3 Z( D" P, ]' D( y
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( I, M) S+ h, [0 C7 n
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
9 O) \) G0 k7 |- S/ band Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is7 y. b! [% o4 O( f+ L4 v
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are l7 g8 J' b7 d. v: B! S$ l3 B
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and% ^+ Q( Z! f$ a. J4 K) H, k
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I( j# ?: F+ M: X x- d1 {9 Q
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
2 O2 L6 N: W5 {* t% V% a" wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, h a# a" u# N% M8 h, q
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
6 o* N0 ]+ f1 ^; H; Z" N1 Zhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
0 E8 v5 t9 r8 {6 dof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that( M- Y' k3 @# R$ Z; m+ U4 X
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are1 f ^9 X3 t$ i. v
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a/ F6 p6 `& G! \; E8 B% ?1 q
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government$ N4 _4 Q [" H; z2 Z
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move+ e0 g3 \/ b' r/ r9 p+ i
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is( s; h% [ E, L0 h
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
# u1 Z. i) a; ?+ y) P5 i! Y xthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
! A# m' D" q3 r7 l. estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to' n: Y3 S$ y% p1 n3 m+ S
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make" O- [9 p0 {3 |, C
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, W) |' F+ m3 |
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a6 P; M& s; }: e
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across/ p* N+ v9 T& M+ A t- ~
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural4 _' J4 X/ W, Q* [! ^/ L( i
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for R" T& s; d! P" W: v2 _
development.
Hutongs- n. h9 E2 Y3 P; r. g4 \
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
/ m) ?! L4 [6 sthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions0 P2 C9 V1 m0 j6 j' w
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not! h5 |; N* z- U. J
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
) p, [. `9 i" }$ k7 w. g5 \2 M7 pwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
. X- P6 n/ U0 @- K; VFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date0 C1 a0 f M4 w! U
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
6 p2 s3 t5 o( J0 q% j; L" sto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 ^% p. p8 [% Q9 X, }9 w. u$ _
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
/ {% M" r% O& Dunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
6 o* F: y% J8 P/ qlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
' Y# Y: T9 G' ]* q! Khutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
: }, Z% b0 B1 i+ l+ [balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
+ a! ^9 R' ]3 u- y8 _project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
0 x9 g; c$ Q3 F. [5 b" Srenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
, ^- M( F0 Q: m) o; `7 S2 P$ u2 ZMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
+ H9 l& `! a* y. j, j6 bpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
: k, q0 M5 y) S% ctorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished: A9 _9 W: r6 ]
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".6 i2 q$ B" g9 `; ?* [
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
, C$ X! Z9 P4 r2 B9 c+ baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially. L. H$ h+ e7 f+ V/ b' q5 Z
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image7 F0 W5 j( o) r6 q- D
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
; J7 P5 M2 W. \0 H" W5 s: qHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
0 R0 N* _% b- p5 D4 N9 |& l5 \people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they7 k1 Y. a6 i0 a
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
* u+ _, E [$ j5 N4 c! Yof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
; ?$ ^# Z0 j6 X5 E: t"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
7 l/ }6 D: g4 V) ^" ^people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
. S9 A& q) Q- |apartments are the way to go? No.
& e( T7 g, F- M; n* v" l* @ f( T" r$ a. L7 f* Y Q
1 J8 e$ r5 o. g3 C) v5 r- B
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
% ~; N, ?2 O0 X* F* ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
! C% I( d$ Y6 b# j* X5 Q6 A+ X( {'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
3 _5 |" r8 J; \( H; N4 h6 h* yno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
0 o# I- B$ W2 x( O' efast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, P# @- ]: W; d# K0 c
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
2 H; [6 I- R, g# mBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
+ @- V6 K; ]& Iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|