服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6298|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; ?7 n( m: t' O architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 2 ?! V( P! ?7 }! j X! ZBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" * u8 S" {) K, O) ]city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.; Q, O- ?' J/ _( y0 c) T% ]3 P1 N' M2 `1 z According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,# H2 ~: p) I. i# D/ U4 @ 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of8 N) l6 X" {8 T% p$ V. G( A* A3 m Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ; P3 P x1 F9 `' A5 C% P$ ~hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among5 r4 l/ x3 A7 R' o each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ) Z* W7 L3 g0 K1 H3 Yand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is+ t! f( N/ `* B harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 9 z% e" d! W1 W' g0 Q$ R8 idescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 6 W+ D, L* h6 z) M) ~4 hforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 1 U- ]9 M) Y; i) x6 zwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 5 N6 h4 y1 k2 Y# M6 f1 \2 r' pimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ; ?. O7 U s j/ I; s; uand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong & M/ O6 f8 _' p% E4 Q3 ^has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ) U0 u# b$ F% X V/ t: @of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! {# o4 m! l! o9 w! K/ J/ F; B no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ( e/ w8 L+ O9 N' }only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a + C% s" o ^: X% F8 q8 O m+ Fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ( }' _4 ]' v% G2 Mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move" o+ T" |8 T. m8 f to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is7 H2 `1 J3 A, \9 V4 Q "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, " M' x; b4 u* I7 M( ethis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are5 R% `1 n4 c1 o1 c: i b still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to # r. o) G5 N0 q ^( \"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 8 c; Z3 g- H" F, o# b; i, q3 G7 Bmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ; f8 t/ S6 z' D- k7 z, la beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 1 i9 z- F6 u L* ^9 O v& ?parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across % F" {; [% x7 u9 B; Dthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural1 F( L0 A; }( D2 C importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for. [1 d! D) ?% D1 T, r$ r! K development.

Hutongs . @( f2 B9 J" E# F: bin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 7 a; ~- O4 D$ K& d+ G- G7 ithere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 6 p- K6 `4 r, ?2 _, {" xin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ! \1 p [. f7 o! o- W7 fhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you % K6 v: U x$ e0 B: P6 @& P2 ^will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. , P% Y% Y6 u8 T8 k% A+ JFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date C3 G# _4 b0 o$ Y to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used % @4 N. d) v2 d4 }! B3 {to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses $ h( I! X2 c* w; o& `# z* asupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically! W) F4 w5 j; O/ s7 ]- y( c) x+ q unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 Z/ o4 c) u4 n) z live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' z( W9 E* S- }8 F hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the7 a ~1 w- E' O2 A. v balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 5 z( |* p# i% h+ ?' kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be * w* l; V" I# z; I. I# S- J3 Lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong % Z- k- z. [( D' XMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how" L" U0 P" y3 R, a' h0 p people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ( [9 \5 M/ U0 ~: P: Otorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 0 F8 M8 C6 L. L7 m- ]+ v7 c7 T" ~memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". x, c( g9 m! G4 INothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ; o u* h0 U( g3 l6 U, `! y% [aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 3 Y/ H6 I- a4 \1 n# Jnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image - H, _7 X! {0 e' }# d) Cof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 1 ~" a0 |: R A. M8 N' [7 g- jHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those& v }/ _/ G. |' N people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they5 C& K% i: T/ G! `% F3 c, g may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" b; |- u$ O0 R0 Z6 p% E5 ]9 Q$ V of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before % ]) I! H8 a2 ?$ q3 q! O) H- R"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all / @3 b! m7 |+ G `" r4 Rpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise" N" N& R" ^& m }* C apartments are the way to go? No. ! g. F7 C# K9 H+ Y/ r) A 2 b G2 S5 H) q - o( P% s% s, z% T" F `

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the6 e6 B) l/ o: y2 O) }0 V2 F( }( V, a situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this / c: w. Z2 {/ W V, t" |( K'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make S# U! E) n9 L( c. T" a/ k/ o: r/ Ino money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so% }; _2 t) n o. B R' U7 ` fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant. Q; v- u2 L$ b# V- l resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 7 ]7 V; i' @' h/ X' UBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 8 Y0 c* d$ o" M7 y5 Vunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-17 06:49 , Processed in 0.136470 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部