|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6048|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its4 o5 V3 k+ T0 T+ m$ p! y; q4 r architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ; N) L- f; s- IBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 6 k& A, `6 s _/ Z8 lcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 j" i& C5 _8 k b According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, * H) v* L# r n; q. r/ T3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 0 C+ f0 [5 x& j @5 |- NManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within b8 e# A4 t2 h4 L4 E8 }( J2 Ahutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among8 F% k9 a; d, H4 e, S each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera/ N0 g1 _5 a# q' C and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is) I% A6 k, j, _! Q& [, d3 T- o5 y harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are : G2 \% | G, j, l/ Jdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and + e2 {0 p7 }; G% _- T8 {( oforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I % B$ U1 z l5 O& Hwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great % Y. [6 l6 O5 \, \9 ? Z- T3 Rimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 2 s {/ Q1 q) E+ h/ d9 Z0 K8 Gand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong3 R+ w2 x3 R. x has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment " j( O/ ^, x( ?! E8 w: H+ }2 Lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that7 Z2 ^! u' a9 \3 q* B no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are% f1 A. L0 ?5 ^, d: B5 o0 S! e only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a+ q8 v* c2 S( \9 k- a: U4 O sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ! G0 h f9 f3 V m% D$ n' f* u, Iwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move( B& I5 z% w% R- E( h( G0 y: o to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is , w& j9 x( i4 D* F" S/ f1 [% i' S"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,/ r# X8 U) ~( N5 B7 \, r* G% N this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 4 k& P0 o: e: N& `6 n4 O5 S4 a* Sstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to) Q' H6 f& y' l4 X3 a "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make $ O: f8 j$ D+ x7 K/ {money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was& t( w; C. o8 ^, v# w' I a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a - ~3 b2 q" i: B' v, ^parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across : s( H. r6 Q4 h5 ?* ]; W$ ithe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural . M3 J% x' ], ~2 simportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for* A* V- G' m2 ~! a5 N development.

Hutongs ! q: D2 h6 p- t4 Fin the old days were residential area where people actually lived0 U8 p! m+ h5 k6 H1 ^ there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ; Z4 V# ^& x8 m7 \in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not Z& Q; h" X6 [( c* T0 Xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ; b- T8 j t+ j( H( Z, O6 Hwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 0 f( i/ ~8 ]3 a2 {3 Y( O( T( BFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ) E% L/ ?8 d$ P$ V0 ato support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 3 M4 Q7 v1 z/ b. R1 wto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 m1 z6 z! |; [) `4 { support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 0 O Y' h2 O/ r& bunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to & g/ [, F; [7 b- q2 V; E5 ~; k6 Tlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,, O7 g+ A4 F @ hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the1 |+ g. K2 ?% |# |( \% b6 i balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 1 y$ ^, _$ M( }0 _# A5 a8 Gproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 6 s0 C1 D2 q4 Y. mrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong, t% b- [( R }) s" i Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 6 B7 w/ O6 _' L( {people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 6 Z& f7 ?6 D: Z- P# W+ r% ctorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished$ v4 j, B6 [+ h7 b# e: | memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".$ H, u) M. V( U9 @/ l# ` Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 3 V8 t8 i! R" x# i; f2 p }7 daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 1 J0 B$ S9 X. F9 y3 Y7 }non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 2 |; w2 P% `2 R9 O3 |9 pof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these & P- O$ B9 S: j0 x' [, DHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 6 E: J' h/ {7 W& `6 b: p! K: gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 9 i* G& ?5 [. M9 B* V- rmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some2 u$ I* m) F3 z- C9 N of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before1 F% C: K' O% S8 o7 D "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ' G$ @) q7 g3 lpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- v0 d0 Z1 D6 h" E2 V9 n- E apartments are the way to go? No. ( Z' J" E" S$ r' l! P& I% G $ {, w9 O# s: O! ]/ Q" g' ^ ) t: Q) ], R7 r& h

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the1 u- I' Y' Z$ e4 k$ y5 p6 H situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; ]5 D- _# K' o6 h8 G- m 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( ^: d2 f0 D. w" a" z no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so : a# G& m& O4 X5 g9 z/ Hfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant- |( i3 t& K) Z+ P3 ~ resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless+ h8 O% K4 @# k$ l; r Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- }+ N8 p0 F- Y! H2 T unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-8-22 20:09 , Processed in 1.129226 second(s), 6 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部