UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its V3 W2 n1 b! _ Y2 j8 C) u I- f
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
) C# I9 N" }3 MBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
+ ?$ l% H, z/ x) @1 o* dcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.# H+ T9 L! y; L5 Z1 l
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
+ K2 A, j/ ^- y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of! X) w' l8 Z) G+ e
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
6 j& R# r) h5 b3 }8 a0 khutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among+ [ o/ Y% _* V( _+ D6 K
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
# Y1 W: i3 z( R% S1 a) L. v* cand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is# G9 Q8 C+ d3 g* l0 R
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
! ? e2 p- L6 f) Bdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and6 I9 j: N" T$ W
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I' d+ t9 U. W l, h3 m% m9 l+ k8 H
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
! e4 H: V+ F1 v ?% ~9 d* Himpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,& G9 q9 p" C" g, q
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
W6 m+ U E) d+ \has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment O9 O& M# T& \7 L# `1 @
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
5 Y" k. W9 _5 r7 yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
5 p/ d1 k1 F% S/ K D% w) ]7 aonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a% y% X0 Q! T4 d) B1 q( H
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
0 O5 R9 V" l1 xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move, z2 ]! s, E7 I9 a% q& L
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
' P$ f3 R6 o' `$ R- w3 F"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,- Z# D- L& g9 n0 d
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are/ a& O1 n+ R* L* m
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to6 _5 f; @( h6 d: d& v2 J
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make9 i, s$ O, e7 c3 R
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was; T. [0 s' Q6 `+ a! e; I4 @
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
- b2 P" I1 _& S$ _ K; rparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& k$ d* q2 s0 u1 _+ V6 p
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ]- w& |+ b3 f' i" L1 ~
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for$ b2 x4 Q& K- m* Y/ A* g* @
development.
Hutongs
9 ^( X5 W9 [* S4 m4 T( tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived& c0 d" Z8 E) e% B. S% M
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 k; |! |, V# f! Q4 ]8 G9 h
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
8 W2 Y4 P5 f- x2 y! F9 q! ` fhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
9 H$ T% a s) v8 r4 _# r% swill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
8 l; E' p; g! {, }2 C$ y$ e Y5 ]Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ] r# o. h, R% B# ~& ~
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used# A/ u) \0 z% H, e
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ l6 _7 _ I! h. ^/ Q
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
% p$ I- W ^1 J7 \unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to, f% B! r6 K: |
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose," o: v& f* I4 S1 \0 ~6 b
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
5 P0 z6 H1 X% r5 Q: d1 H! e5 abalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
: M% y7 X8 U% L3 X0 O: Uproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
- u2 i! _) y; w' s: P7 Jrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
* v" B* Q' f5 l1 A6 mMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
8 ]% U( L" j! l: Z: C" L$ Npeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
! {* z3 o; Q& {( _& J9 Qtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
' ], A: y* a: y( K' I3 ?memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".7 x9 g5 R/ Z1 T4 m
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
7 w+ l2 A; F: Z+ p! f; M5 a# caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
8 w$ j/ L. k& U, d X4 C9 knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
9 ^( T9 s0 k1 f0 E- eof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these4 z8 S6 e& y3 n* ]+ P
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
2 D1 z- P; g* e2 j' m! w, Speople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
2 u; `' r4 U [" v4 Tmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
o! K' m+ ]5 z: o2 B1 f& Gof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
0 R {! C3 @8 }"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all+ s3 m1 n. U+ {
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
. ]9 W) S4 w8 ~7 K9 f# Lapartments are the way to go? No.
9 m3 I. D8 j" [/ v
- k7 ^- q k. H % c' Z% C, d' S
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the/ s0 j. u6 r) J0 o; A. O |" h, M
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
( ]5 ~9 N+ p. q# J$ n'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
4 g* c* F7 x, s! ~/ {- Lno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ^) i0 E# J6 P3 v1 {+ B
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
0 n- y% |+ k: E; q4 _resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless: v+ h7 C) j$ W" p' \
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
- d/ C3 A, P3 u8 V+ Q% L: ~; u! Yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|