|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6154|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its V3 W2 n1 b! _ Y2 j8 C) u I- f architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ) C# I9 N" }3 MBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" + ?$ l% H, z/ x) @1 o* dcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.# H+ T9 L! y; L5 Z1 l According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, + K2 A, j/ ^- y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of! X) w' l8 Z) G+ e Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 6 j& R# r) h5 b3 }8 a0 khutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among+ [ o/ Y% _* V( _+ D6 K each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera # Y1 W: i3 z( R% S1 a) L. v* cand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is# G9 Q8 C+ d3 g* l0 R harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ! ? e2 p- L6 f) Bdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and6 I9 j: N" T$ W forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I' d+ t9 U. W l, h3 m% m9 l+ k8 H was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ! e4 H: V+ F1 v ?% ~9 d* Himpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,& G9 q9 p" C" g, q and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong W6 m+ U E) d+ \has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment O9 O& M# T& \7 L# `1 @ of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 5 Y" k. W9 _5 r7 yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 5 p/ d1 k1 F% S/ K D% w) ]7 aonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a% y% X0 Q! T4 d) B1 q( H sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 0 O5 R9 V" l1 xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move, z2 ]! s, E7 I9 a% q& L to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ' P$ f3 R6 o' `$ R- w3 F"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,- Z# D- L& g9 n0 d this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are/ a& O1 n+ R* L* m still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to6 _5 f; @( h6 d: d& v2 J "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make9 i, s$ O, e7 c3 R money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was; T. [0 s' Q6 `+ a! e; I4 @ a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a - b2 P" I1 _& S$ _ K; rparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& k$ d* q2 s0 u1 _+ V6 p the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ]- w& |+ b3 f' i" L1 ~ importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for$ b2 x4 Q& K- m* Y/ A* g* @ development.

Hutongs 9 ^( X5 W9 [* S4 m4 T( tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived& c0 d" Z8 E) e% B. S% M there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 k; |! |, V# f! Q4 ]8 G9 h in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 8 W2 Y4 P5 f- x2 y! F9 q! ` fhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 9 H$ T% a s) v8 r4 _# r% swill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 8 l; E' p; g! {, }2 C$ y$ e Y5 ]Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ] r# o. h, R% B# ~& ~ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used# A/ u) \0 z% H, e to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ l6 _7 _ I! h. ^/ Q support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically % p$ I- W ^1 J7 \unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to, f% B! r6 K: | live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose," o: v& f* I4 S1 \0 ~6 b hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 5 P0 z6 H1 X% r5 Q: d1 H! e5 abalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the : M% y7 X8 U% L3 X0 O: Uproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be - u2 i! _) y; w' s: P7 Jrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong * v" B* Q' f5 l1 A6 mMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 8 ]% U( L" j! l: Z: C" L$ Npeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ! {* z3 o; Q& {( _& J9 Qtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ' ], A: y* a: y( K' I3 ?memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".7 x9 g5 R/ Z1 T4 m Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 7 w+ l2 A; F: Z+ p! f; M5 a# caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 8 w$ j/ L. k& U, d X4 C9 knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 9 ^( T9 s0 k1 f0 E- eof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these4 z8 S6 e& y3 n* ]+ P Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 2 D1 z- P; g* e2 j' m! w, Speople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 2 u; `' r4 U [" v4 Tmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some o! K' m+ ]5 z: o2 B1 f& Gof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 0 R {! C3 @8 }"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all+ s3 m1 n. U+ { people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . ]9 W) S4 w8 ~7 K9 f# Lapartments are the way to go? No. 9 m3 I. D8 j" [/ v - k7 ^- q k. H % c' Z% C, d' S

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the/ s0 j. u6 r) J0 o; A. O |" h, M situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( ]5 ~9 N+ p. q# J$ n'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 4 g* c* F7 x, s! ~/ {- Lno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ^) i0 E# J6 P3 v1 {+ B fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 0 n- y% |+ k: E; q4 _resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless: v+ h7 C) j$ W" p' \ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is - d/ C3 A, P3 u8 V+ Q% L: ~; u! Yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-10-9 14:58 , Processed in 1.144466 second(s), 6 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部