UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its4 o5 V3 k+ T0 T+ m$ p! y; q4 r
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
; N) L- f; s- IBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
6 k& A, `6 s _/ Z8 lcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 j" i& C5 _8 k b
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
* H) v* L# r n; q. r/ T3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
0 C+ f0 [5 x& j @5 |- NManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
b8 e# A4 t2 h4 L4 E8 }( J2 Ahutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among8 F% k9 a; d, H4 e, S
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera/ N0 g1 _5 a# q' C
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is) I% A6 k, j, _! Q& [, d3 T- o5 y
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
: G2 \% | G, j, l/ Jdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
+ e2 {0 p7 }; G% _- T8 {( oforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
% B$ U1 z l5 O& Hwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
% Y. [6 l6 O5 \, \9 ? Z- T3 Rimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
2 s {/ Q1 q) E+ h/ d9 Z0 K8 Gand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong3 R+ w2 x3 R. x
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
" j( O/ ^, x( ?! E8 w: H+ }2 Lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that7 Z2 ^! u' a9 \3 q* B
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are% f1 A. L0 ?5 ^, d: B5 o0 S! e
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a+ q8 v* c2 S( \9 k- a: U4 O
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
! G0 h f9 f3 V m% D$ n' f* u, Iwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move( B& I5 z% w% R- E( h( G0 y: o
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
, w& j9 x( i4 D* F" S/ f1 [% i' S"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,/ r# X8 U) ~( N5 B7 \, r* G% N
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
4 k& P0 o: e: N& `6 n4 O5 S4 a* Sstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to) Q' H6 f& y' l4 X3 a
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
$ O: f8 j$ D+ x7 K/ {money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was& t( w; C. o8 ^, v# w' I
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
- ~3 b2 q" i: B' v, ^parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
: s( H. r6 Q4 h5 ?* ]; W$ ithe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
. M3 J% x' ], ~2 simportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for* A* V- G' m2 ~! a5 N
development.
Hutongs
! q: D2 h6 p- t4 Fin the old days were residential area where people actually lived0 U8 p! m+ h5 k6 H1 ^
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
; Z4 V# ^& x8 m7 \in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
Z& Q; h" X6 [( c* T0 Xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
; b- T8 j t+ j( H( Z, O6 Hwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
0 f( i/ ~8 ]3 a2 {3 Y( O( T( BFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
) E% L/ ?8 d$ P$ V0 ato support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
3 M4 Q7 v1 z/ b. R1 wto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 m1 z6 z! |; [) `4 {
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
0 O Y' h2 O/ r& bunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
& g/ [, F; [7 b- q2 V; E5 ~; k6 Tlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,, O7 g+ A4 F @
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the1 |+ g. K2 ?% |# |( \% b6 i
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
1 y$ ^, _$ M( }0 _# A5 a8 Gproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
6 s0 C1 D2 q4 Y. mrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong, t% b- [( R }) s" i
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
6 B7 w/ O6 _' L( {people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
6 Z& f7 ?6 D: Z- P# W+ r% ctorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished$ v4 j, B6 [+ h7 b# e: |
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".$ H, u) M. V( U9 @/ l# `
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
3 V8 t8 i! R" x# i; f2 p }7 daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
1 J0 B$ S9 X. F9 y3 Y7 }non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
2 |; w2 P% `2 R9 O3 |9 pof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
& P- O$ B9 S: j0 x' [, DHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
6 E: J' h/ {7 W& `6 b: p! K: gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
9 i* G& ?5 [. M9 B* V- rmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some2 u$ I* m) F3 z- C9 N
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before1 F% C: K' O% S8 o7 D
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
' G$ @) q7 g3 lpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- v0 d0 Z1 D6 h" E2 V9 n- E
apartments are the way to go? No.
( Z' J" E" S$ r' l! P& I% G
$ {, w9 O# s: O! ]/ Q" g' ^
) t: Q) ], R7 r& h
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the1 u- I' Y' Z$ e4 k$ y5 p6 H
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; ]5 D- _# K' o6 h8 G- m
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( ^: d2 f0 D. w" a" z
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
: a# G& m& O4 X5 g9 z/ Hfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant- |( i3 t& K) Z+ P3 ~
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless+ h8 O% K4 @# k$ l; r
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- }+ N8 p0 F- Y! H2 T
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|