|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6146|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its , R* V% t' t. N/ K) earchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider : b' | ]( S( n2 O+ L/ PBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 h$ y y4 [! z city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. $ c# q8 |8 j. F$ k3 N8 mAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ' J1 f* P0 K5 Q y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ! h( {8 m$ q2 r: p) Z+ b: IManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within. l5 {3 `5 T) A D+ G( K& o hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among* O" c7 K P/ u* A7 c- v each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera4 [% r' ]# A5 M: H+ _8 W and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ! W+ K2 `/ t9 dharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are, M8 U, g; @0 s descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and$ u$ U# e5 d) f forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I+ M) R V; G8 d! c was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great $ r* ^6 [0 v) m, @8 z* O1 ]! i: mimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, " m3 S# K' x. D0 O. s+ Yand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 6 i7 M7 _* X7 T: w) A# J. Ohas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment & @) f, N3 A8 g- A& A6 `) `( rof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that7 W3 T: e. W' G no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 6 y8 I& C3 s8 konly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ) S" h$ B6 @2 ]/ ]- Fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ; d; M( a |, v6 I; U" owant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move + t6 G3 m' E; F V1 }; [0 z Wto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is , h" B- G+ Y/ g! x- ?- i: `* ?' {"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 9 f7 ^# j1 C6 s" ~9 vthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are & f$ F4 o2 {% ^8 [) ~: B" p2 t4 j% rstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ! }4 _: Z q6 {5 l"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& \1 Y; y/ O( o7 H" u9 C# ?% { money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 9 B- V& P' x. ?7 m6 ra beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a# w' T0 X+ V% N/ ?; Y$ E5 q/ L parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across$ }( O( ^8 x7 j) u the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 9 m6 d% m5 X" |( Z1 v/ Gimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; P8 l! L$ @4 U0 x0 t development.

Hutongs1 ^3 \# _9 `/ M0 u in the old days were residential area where people actually lived S/ G8 l a$ m1 T$ Z& [) n3 } there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 ]! s0 x6 G! Y* @2 j in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not5 u" A' j8 @: U8 T6 ^- M P7 w! x. o have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you' G# G7 }+ H* w; e will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. + W1 u# c z `: P( J FFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ; Y' y* q/ u P8 Jto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used7 B+ X; i; y, R6 l/ |6 n& e% h1 F6 Z to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 P3 t5 V* \5 D, @2 ~( G* C support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; t" w2 F `+ N1 X' W% s unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to , V9 l1 S8 u8 w' D$ vlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,4 ]8 w- W* k2 o& {% H' G hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the ! C' y, u2 J: `& i+ lbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 8 ?. v! r8 Y9 Z0 @) Gproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be0 {& G& ~$ S3 f" Y renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 2 ~! M8 ^0 w8 aMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how( q, ~: R! S2 b# x9 W' v. _# x people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 7 R! U* o" X+ {" M% i2 ~7 {! [) Ftorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished " M) A: w) W- C7 _memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". / @4 m2 I9 c( y$ VNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are $ o7 h$ _' G: t- l8 Baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially & {% Y3 s: y$ o2 X2 a5 }non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image; b% H% ^9 m, W2 n# e of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 2 P3 l2 `- Z: U% _4 V" M7 P' vHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those3 t$ V! k3 J! s( L+ G people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they $ K( x$ R( J. H/ e/ rmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 1 G7 ~9 r: }1 k% S0 |, _of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before; k. w6 I$ V/ W2 L "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ! E: j8 b' E' q2 p( wpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise % l7 r) e+ | T; G/ p$ b- Napartments are the way to go? No. 4 ^9 ^ x- r! M; o9 H2 q ; k. n- r {, v, j * E$ l; j7 j R5 {9 ?' Z' X

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the % \6 D! B s" x, fsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& F0 h' d' b. E' {/ T 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make/ q( K2 [2 ^/ n: f e" ~; {. h7 D; r no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so, r0 _) P! l9 b" ~/ M fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant * i/ A( J% e0 ~; X4 `9 v) Mresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless2 |5 d! _6 _5 {' j6 x) [ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is; b8 o0 g% [+ L5 Q8 I unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-10-5 17:01 , Processed in 1.144481 second(s), 5 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部