|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6044|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its' m! F( X+ W% e9 }+ U architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider : Y, U6 Y0 G7 ]) A XBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 0 ^2 r" k3 Y& C9 i' z1 m% ncity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. , F, `3 r1 E4 f; fAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, - B* n9 a$ N2 N) Y) V( m# @/ B7 C3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 4 K7 E- K0 Q: Z+ T3 q, UManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within- n% {) z5 x+ S+ O: A L& V hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 6 h5 S; L7 `8 ~% c3 {* k5 c! O! jeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ! P, q. o6 Q. k! U; p$ Z/ n' Band Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 5 q5 D9 O4 z% Iharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are( ?1 X) c7 l) X# K7 r descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and . q$ E% B/ {3 w% ?forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I% x; q. |( x7 K& G3 R was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 0 p8 S9 i7 n( J. ~ iimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,# e0 f/ @' T) h5 [/ O, q9 t and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong + x, x" R& I1 D, \1 w, Q& Ohas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 3 z6 R2 b. t. h* q) }8 F; r3 _- hof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that : f1 G5 g, V5 ] X( G( qno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ; e/ V0 Y3 N& F' Gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a Z9 o" r t$ H sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government" v3 S B0 E2 t& A9 R want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move6 c& q' u/ n B( r* w! d to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is9 O# s3 N8 D" Q! f) q) ` "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 5 w* _& V! t! T: Ithis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are8 D8 K& _& \0 Z# ?7 l0 _" y) D. N# _ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; h9 v6 a3 m0 f" u! t" D8 E5 }. y "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 2 `; F; _) z7 H5 ]money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was * X$ T$ T0 B: y0 n% la beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: W3 l6 A O) a parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 u' ?% @# C j6 c the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 9 n5 @$ b5 ~$ e1 w+ dimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for& o+ [! Z" _9 _6 I; d! m development.

Hutongs/ Y# Y8 I* t6 \! i6 q3 P0 X in the old days were residential area where people actually lived . Q+ Z7 r7 O/ x; L+ T/ y/ k; l+ Dthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions1 |3 W& z( f! {# P in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not6 r. K% {- W O' `( P6 R& n7 {# d0 C have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 8 d) P) q$ a6 Z& J2 o/ Y' Nwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. + h* I9 q7 H- _& G- l/ NFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date% P) G2 F4 G9 {/ q to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 1 C6 Y8 ?, s" r. m/ ~! yto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses % o1 P. l( R% G T' Isupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically& U9 z1 \" p s# [- t. [ unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to " ^+ b, ?$ t8 t1 z( C8 elive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 3 ^; E e( J! P$ a, b- bhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the & o$ {8 D- T3 e! |/ |4 B7 }balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 8 k& h5 b. [& R4 _! P bproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be' U4 _, L: ?% k renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong9 K9 h$ l6 K. l+ l5 K) d, K1 O Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 4 ^, |; s5 H0 `: |# w5 wpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be# n/ u6 J- z, N8 L7 { torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished + p( Z" r8 v( {2 Ememories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".1 p1 j- h) d& g, w' T Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 8 ~0 p! q& w; H6 u% {2 b& ~aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially7 J( N5 O, e+ V' ]7 X: p/ `, S. h5 ~ non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image - m( U% a1 Y6 h. N7 |of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these- X9 E; Z" H' ]% T Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those) x4 T z: Q6 K B' z people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 7 ]& o' \% T; ?! r* {$ i, y/ ymay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some # o3 D6 }+ C+ X+ Jof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before & ^2 ?, [4 K7 b- h( V"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all - i- e+ u5 F- P% _6 R9 p9 c1 l6 s. Gpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise; g& b- r. l& T, }! t4 E4 y5 {$ h) O apartments are the way to go? No./ h1 r* v; K5 L5 a( G 4 i+ M, o8 J/ J8 f- g 9 L6 L* B8 a4 }0 R

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the* _3 g( A8 E. v1 ^* Y situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this8 A& Y; P$ F# f: ]' N5 g 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make & y- K7 i R: m3 }" B" vno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 8 h5 }5 [1 B$ n. A7 F( ^4 A9 _fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant) U/ k+ K" a0 N+ E5 q% x resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless; @% a- p6 ]2 O5 g) E4 A( c Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is2 s9 b5 C6 \- r! }- L unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-8-21 13:41 , Processed in 1.129489 second(s), 5 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部