UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
; ?! V/ k' C Farchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider8 r/ t2 ^4 F$ g' P
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" t7 n3 H# J z5 {7 L; T4 B" G" M
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.% o0 m1 F) p) m# ]; U
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,* H5 F4 I7 t4 K& q3 H C
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of5 P) H2 M7 L# y0 w9 @& q) ]+ j7 e
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
6 \: ?- i8 N0 N4 u3 phutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among4 u5 N1 d L5 u9 r, q3 Q
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera3 P# y9 ^5 D( {$ e
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
+ g1 F2 |5 |# q7 j c+ l8 b ~harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
/ y; W' K( n& U5 g6 z* l) gdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
1 S6 f; Y8 D, G+ ~. Dforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I6 S. p3 d$ h- e# g; z: ~* F
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
& L: u; A S$ V) E+ zimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
9 |. k8 i3 s0 Jand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
) k/ C0 s: d3 Vhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment/ x/ S) g) ]* ~ \8 t# p
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
* K9 b' Q7 M4 s* Q4 Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
w% y( x3 a" U4 J& Xonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
: M" e/ h9 H2 v( _! a0 N% esort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government& r6 W' X/ W2 c% n# n6 i. G
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move" V+ M d- y i
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is$ p- C- M* j% V/ ]
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,6 l; n% a: U7 H' |
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
' x" c' H# R" o6 vstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
5 l" d" G% U, o; k, }0 P9 U; M9 Q"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make6 V4 d" t7 \% z
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
0 a/ I$ H# i+ U$ J1 Ia beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a/ h% ]+ j& |& l0 ^- {
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& W, ^: `6 m# s7 ^
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
5 }4 n, L* R' A7 r3 Rimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 a$ R' Y6 }' R# U2 K+ b
development.
Hutongs
) F' I* g) w5 D9 W+ K: b" b2 c9 u4 Hin the old days were residential area where people actually lived0 h+ t( d. p' l" E. I9 w4 V2 Y1 U2 F
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions* ?( t! B$ q* K9 q* }
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not; G! l/ Z6 f, ~/ W3 H' |8 ~ K. S
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
7 Y4 x, \- L. }( wwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
5 _; Q/ ~2 `$ |8 h! v q$ ~Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
$ }# @2 v9 W* dto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used, S; i* q2 t% `& {
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses5 p I9 v7 e; n, Q6 `2 F' G
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
0 \* ]. I: l1 `unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to' e. M: a( }# f) c# S
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,* R, v* v( Z+ B* |- W1 c
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
# e0 E u* _: z+ ]3 }, B, ]balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
' X, V- n( c( ^) M- r* Hproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be! J! M; V* n z( y4 p
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
: V3 K5 z' t# K) j0 Y5 cMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how+ c m* X }' q6 H
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be' w# C& E; M: @3 I* R8 j: y
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
9 A3 J" t) z: | S0 w: d8 Q) s) tmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
7 o& K/ U9 S+ z6 w! e3 y& k3 ]Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are0 i9 D% h: S! Q
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
B. c2 h. ^/ @7 inon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image9 L- m$ C0 q" E2 k# f
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
" N) l3 U p# u. B h: H. ^* vHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
, h/ T4 F5 Z' V* y: p" Gpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they3 H( v, E9 m" E7 X, L. I: {
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
2 s5 }) i5 j& O9 y. Oof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
J m, ^+ I, J"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
~# r2 V$ I: g( fpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
0 V8 t6 F! }% E1 t% }' B$ }apartments are the way to go? No.
: u# Y5 z7 m. _' _8 |# K6 I; P: `
. ?' K( |+ ?' H2 N* O
1 E% M, \. Q6 U- q* x, _
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
0 |: K7 e' ~( e* m. ysituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
* u6 x2 S2 K+ \- a' w'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make# B3 D" I* P7 h/ d- _
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so8 f9 M3 g$ o( S6 q
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
4 E5 N! `' x' L X" Sresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless, c5 p! X8 n1 G. s6 S$ i+ i
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
7 J+ o& _! w6 l" u8 Bunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|