UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; R' Y) q; W: G) G# V
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider" S" K6 ^. S& [/ i
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
5 T+ V+ e1 I7 A/ ^- bcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
% Q) @* u% J: r) z; z! F( uAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
5 z( I$ J$ H/ ]" b' i1 ?3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of3 Y; e9 G6 s) | ]0 p0 U
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
. e1 I( c% o' E, Y& S% d( Mhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among$ z. T y. u9 W9 d
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
2 z, k* ]' a& Wand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
. I# }: I3 u3 s2 mharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are) Q1 F6 T6 Q6 O3 J ^
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and- y5 ^/ D' o% {3 [6 F5 ?
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
: Z+ |) D# H d3 vwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
# O" `" t3 x! u9 U& c0 fimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,& c W- g2 z( y2 J
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong1 x2 J1 b: K/ q `6 H
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
6 j; b6 S# @4 Wof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that+ J9 ^9 x) ], w" N
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are) X6 W+ d% u( K' H6 W8 ^
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
# |: v/ S; A, x6 psort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
+ V" n& ^9 V2 ^0 K/ h \1 Q mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move9 C/ v% _3 a. m+ s& H
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is9 X$ ]1 i! Z+ @, Q
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
6 j; [1 c4 u# |" ]6 H% qthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
3 e8 V! |! J1 a) S* {, z3 H4 k& Astill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to: i& X; U t) b
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make q! z0 D* Z& V4 v5 S: `6 e9 e
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was/ H* Z' E# t# J! w* K8 \2 y
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a5 ]- F7 A% ] o
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across- o( x4 X! s |; q7 s
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
: D$ z7 q% G$ l8 m8 f5 ]' gimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for# O( a; q$ O% ]. ^4 Z
development.
Hutongs
1 E1 L) t& \8 tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
* }* o# d9 ~& ]5 y: mthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
' _ `) m+ |% Bin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( s$ j& \% S4 o! N; G" G5 y! P7 \/ p+ G
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
8 O; Y3 I7 l9 J4 r9 jwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.8 \' s3 Q% U8 n- v
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date( g( ^( f8 j4 E( n4 p
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
I4 a: B2 x# g4 {- E; s! @6 j' Ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
9 p) N1 B) l( x' K( O% Dsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
& Y) M9 I. f* z" \# kunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
- c, [+ W3 s& w" alive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. g4 v; F9 O8 n2 e0 E/ `
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the4 Y+ G) i$ D L+ Y6 f
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
5 G# R- ?6 }$ h) |, D, G3 p% q" T zproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be# w5 A$ M8 R* R1 p2 }, V4 h! o
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
. d# ?! s% i$ AMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
( }% R7 h P$ Y. c! b A% N# Vpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be$ k- Z) y' ^6 g7 K, }9 |
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished$ f+ h" u4 E! T4 [( f: @
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
& \$ C# |: R$ \; _1 J5 t( v% Z: }Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are$ A X0 s0 c6 X+ I# B) a
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 |: H" | q" ~$ L
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image9 X& m8 `3 t: w4 G2 U) _
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
: z' Z- u M! p3 e( L& THutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those$ c/ z% A5 d; v3 V" Y
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they3 K: X( a# P* m' G! _, E
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
7 h/ n# k; {& a" [, gof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
. G$ p& y: x1 l% }1 F! \"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all1 G j, {1 x$ @
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
0 t; y- b& J, o" ]6 D5 w; J. `apartments are the way to go? No.8 t4 b* d) A0 S7 B- x" Y
7 {0 t. [: {! j& A( A
, w k. C- x# m4 E
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
$ \& o' N0 s( C5 d" g* M# _situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this* V8 M, U6 ]4 [
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make$ Y* i3 {( V* }9 m: Z) T* @; X) r
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
: W2 G& _4 K1 w2 }( sfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant0 F/ K# P; s. g; ~: X% M* ]
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless, c; ]# A4 p& m! {% j; Q6 u; x
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is0 t* o, Y6 W+ m6 u
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|